FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2010429148> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2010429148 endingPage "106" @default.
• W2010429148 startingPage "104" @default.
• W2010429148 abstract "104 SHOFAR Winter 1995 Vol. 13, No.2 substantial, thoughtful essay that comments on current scholariytrends and places each collection of essays in a larger context. Harry Zohn Department ofGermanic and Slavic Languages Brandeis University Christian Theology Mter the Shoah, by James F. Moore. Studies in the Sboab, Volume VII. Lanham: University Press of America, 1993. 189 pp. .$44.50. JamesF. Moore, a Lutheran theologian from Valparaiso University, has been an important contributor to the contemporary reformulation of Christianity's theological approach to Judaism and the Jewish People for the past decade. He has especially emphasized the centrality of the Sboab to this effort. Picking up the challenge to Christian theology laid down by the noted German Catholic scholar Johannes Metz, who has argued that all theology today must integrate the reality of the Sboab into its deliberations and formulations in a foundational way, Moo're attempts a reconstruction not only of the content of doing theology, but also of the metbod. It is in the latter area that his book shows the most creativity whether one agrees or not with some of its basic conclusions. It is in the methodological area that Moore in fact feels most previous efforts at a post-Sboab Christian theology have fallen short despite much admirable development in terms of content. Moore has opted for Midrasb as his basic interpretive tool in constructing a post-Sboab Christian theology and, in particular, for incorporating central New Testament texts into such a theology. Such Midrashic interpretation has a history in Christianity, having been employed by many of the Church Fathers such as Justin, Ignatius, and Irenaeus. Its roots ultimately lie in the Pharisaic/rabbinic notion of Oral Torah. If there is an incompleteness about Moore's analysis at this point, it is due to his failure to link his methodology to the Catholic/Orthodox sense of tradition as a source of biblical re-interpretation. This may reflect his Protestant heritage. In his application of the Midrashic method to traditional Christian teaching Moore elects to focus on the Passion Narratives (particularly the image of Jews that they convey) because of the central role these texts ha~e played historically in shaping the classical Christian theology and the Book Reviews 105 Jewish People as well as Christian identity itself. Focusing on the Jesus of the Last Supper narratives, the Jesus of the Trial sequence, and the accounts of Jesus on the Cross, Moore tries to show how the Midrashic method helps us see the basic story of Holy Week as one in which the Jewish Jesus remains to the end very much integral to the community of Israel. Moore also subjects the most distinctive of Christian biblical textsthose which proclaim Jesus' resurrection-to the Midrashic methodology. For him this results in an understanding of the resurrected Jesus as the supreme example for Christians of the post-Shoah obligation for rescue. Jesus, Moore insists, should not be viewed within the context of a postShoah Christology primarily through the lens of victimhood, allied with the Jewish and other victims of the Nazis. Rather the stress should be given to Jesus as rescuer. Establishing any direct linkage between the sufferings of Jesus and the victims of the Shoah Moore regards as not merely insensitive but downright obscene. This is certainly an exciting and compelling vision presented by Moore in terms of textual analysis. While I think interpreting the central texts of the Christian biblical tradition only in terms of rescue is too limited, he has nonetheless added a potentially enriching dimension to a fully developed post-Shoah Christology that can truly acknowledge the continuing validity and meaning of the Jewish covenant. If his perspective is to gain support outside the potentially sympathetic core of Christian scholars already committed to the dialogue with Jews, he will need to relate his choice of the Midrashic method to the wider discussion of method currently underway within biblical and theological circles, offering some sound arguments why this particular method in the end ought to be preferred over presently existing options. At one point in his argumentation Moore makes mention of my own interpretation of Christology, largely rooted in the Incarnation. In his perspective a focus..." @default.
• W2010429148 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2010429148 creator A5059227675 @default.
• W2010429148 date "1995-01-01" @default.
• W2010429148 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2010429148 title "<i>Christian Theology After the Shoah</i> (review)" @default.
• W2010429148 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/sho.1995.0023" @default.
• W2010429148 hasPublicationYear "1995" @default.
• W2010429148 type Work @default.
• W2010429148 sameAs 2010429148 @default.
• W2010429148 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2010429148 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2010429148 hasAuthorship W2010429148A5059227675 @default.
• W2010429148 hasConcept C110361221 @default.
• W2010429148 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2010429148 hasConcept C150152722 @default.
• W2010429148 hasConcept C150608813 @default.
• W2010429148 hasConcept C154775046 @default.
• W2010429148 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2010429148 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2010429148 hasConcept C199176802 @default.
• W2010429148 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2010429148 hasConcept C24667770 @default.
• W2010429148 hasConcept C27206212 @default.
• W2010429148 hasConcept C2778061430 @default.
• W2010429148 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2010429148 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2010429148 hasConcept C527412718 @default.
• W2010429148 hasConcept C551968917 @default.
• W2010429148 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2010429148 hasConceptScore W2010429148C110361221 @default.
• W2010429148 hasConceptScore W2010429148C138885662 @default.
• W2010429148 hasConceptScore W2010429148C150152722 @default.
• W2010429148 hasConceptScore W2010429148C150608813 @default.
• W2010429148 hasConceptScore W2010429148C154775046 @default.
• W2010429148 hasConceptScore W2010429148C166957645 @default.
• W2010429148 hasConceptScore W2010429148C17744445 @default.
• W2010429148 hasConceptScore W2010429148C199176802 @default.
• W2010429148 hasConceptScore W2010429148C199539241 @default.
• W2010429148 hasConceptScore W2010429148C24667770 @default.
• W2010429148 hasConceptScore W2010429148C27206212 @default.
• W2010429148 hasConceptScore W2010429148C2778061430 @default.
• W2010429148 hasConceptScore W2010429148C2779343474 @default.
• W2010429148 hasConceptScore W2010429148C41895202 @default.
• W2010429148 hasConceptScore W2010429148C527412718 @default.
• W2010429148 hasConceptScore W2010429148C551968917 @default.
• W2010429148 hasConceptScore W2010429148C95457728 @default.
• W2010429148 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2010429148 hasLocation W20104291481 @default.
• W2010429148 hasOpenAccess W2010429148 @default.
• W2010429148 hasPrimaryLocation W20104291481 @default.
• W2010429148 hasRelatedWork W2010905003 @default.
• W2010429148 hasRelatedWork W2046828610 @default.
• W2010429148 hasRelatedWork W2138539177 @default.
• W2010429148 hasRelatedWork W2274339522 @default.
• W2010429148 hasRelatedWork W2463671922 @default.
• W2010429148 hasRelatedWork W2485504126 @default.
• W2010429148 hasRelatedWork W2509370837 @default.
• W2010429148 hasRelatedWork W2900814641 @default.
• W2010429148 hasRelatedWork W611549862 @default.
• W2010429148 hasRelatedWork W637176129 @default.
• W2010429148 hasVolume "13" @default.
• W2010429148 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2010429148 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2010429148 magId "2010429148" @default.
• W2010429148 workType "article" @default.