FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2010639658> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2010639658 endingPage "95" @default.
• W2010639658 startingPage "90" @default.
• W2010639658 abstract "ObjectiveAcute venous thromboembolism and chronic venous diseases are common conditions that affect a large proportion of the United States population. The diagnosis of venous disease has improved, and the treatment options have rapidly evolved over the past decade. To date, it is unclear to what extent vascular surgeons have become involved in the modern management of venous disorders. This survey was undertaken to explore the current interest and practice of vascular surgeons in the contemporary care of venous disease.MethodsA survey was administered via a web-based platform to active and candidate members of the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS). The survey included 30 questions investigating the characteristics of venous surgeons and scope of venous practice. Open-ended questions were also included for commentary.ResultsA total of 1879 surveys were sent to SVS members nationwide, and 385 members participated (response rate of 20.5%). The participants were mostly men (89.6%) with 37.7% practicing in an academic setting and 59.2% in private practice. The respondents treated superficial veins (92.9%) and deep veins (85.8%) in clinical practice, with 89.9% having their own vascular laboratory. A wide spectrum of interventions for superficial (91.9%), deep (85.8%), and perforator veins (52.7% endovenous, 19.4% subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery) are being performed by respondents. Only 26.2% had learned endovenous thermal ablation in their training program; however, over 96% of those performing venous interventions utilized this technique. Overall, the majority (85.5%) devoted 50% or less of practice to venous disorders. Respondents indicated that limitations to expansion of vein practices mainly involved challenges with third party payers, local competition, and existing large volumes of arterial interventions needing to be performed. Despite the widespread incorporation of venous disease into current vascular practices, 66.1% are not members of the American Venous Forum (AVF) or other venous society. Many believe there is still a lack of standardization of care and guidelines for venous disease.ConclusionsThe care of patients with venous disease has become more widespread among SVS members, with most offering both deep and superficial venous interventions as well as incorporation of minimally invasive techniques into their treatment armamentarium. Dissemination and incorporation of protocols and guidelines into clinical practice as well as postgraduate courses in venous disease may be areas in which the SVS could facilitate members' involvement in the care of patients with venous disease. Acute venous thromboembolism and chronic venous diseases are common conditions that affect a large proportion of the United States population. The diagnosis of venous disease has improved, and the treatment options have rapidly evolved over the past decade. To date, it is unclear to what extent vascular surgeons have become involved in the modern management of venous disorders. This survey was undertaken to explore the current interest and practice of vascular surgeons in the contemporary care of venous disease. A survey was administered via a web-based platform to active and candidate members of the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS). The survey included 30 questions investigating the characteristics of venous surgeons and scope of venous practice. Open-ended questions were also included for commentary. A total of 1879 surveys were sent to SVS members nationwide, and 385 members participated (response rate of 20.5%). The participants were mostly men (89.6%) with 37.7% practicing in an academic setting and 59.2% in private practice. The respondents treated superficial veins (92.9%) and deep veins (85.8%) in clinical practice, with 89.9% having their own vascular laboratory. A wide spectrum of interventions for superficial (91.9%), deep (85.8%), and perforator veins (52.7% endovenous, 19.4% subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery) are being performed by respondents. Only 26.2% had learned endovenous thermal ablation in their training program; however, over 96% of those performing venous interventions utilized this technique. Overall, the majority (85.5%) devoted 50% or less of practice to venous disorders. Respondents indicated that limitations to expansion of vein practices mainly involved challenges with third party payers, local competition, and existing large volumes of arterial interventions needing to be performed. Despite the widespread incorporation of venous disease into current vascular practices, 66.1% are not members of the American Venous Forum (AVF) or other venous society. Many believe there is still a lack of standardization of care and guidelines for venous disease. The care of patients with venous disease has become more widespread among SVS members, with most offering both deep and superficial venous interventions as well as incorporation of minimally invasive techniques into their treatment armamentarium. Dissemination and incorporation of protocols and guidelines into clinical practice as well as postgraduate courses in venous disease may be areas in which the SVS could facilitate members' involvement in the care of patients with venous disease." @default.
• W2010639658 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2010639658 creator A5002868180 @default.
• W2010639658 creator A5055044637 @default.
• W2010639658 date "2013-01-01" @default.
• W2010639658 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W2010639658 title "A survey of current practice of vascular surgeons in venous disease management" @default.
• W2010639658 cites W1862054033 @default.
• W2010639658 cites W1964270874 @default.
• W2010639658 cites W1970077583 @default.
• W2010639658 cites W1971018109 @default.
• W2010639658 cites W1983845869 @default.
• W2010639658 cites W2022932023 @default.
• W2010639658 cites W2095294819 @default.
• W2010639658 cites W2103909362 @default.
• W2010639658 cites W2136139586 @default.
• W2010639658 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2012.10.004" @default.
• W2010639658 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26993902" @default.
• W2010639658 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2010639658 type Work @default.
• W2010639658 sameAs 2010639658 @default.
• W2010639658 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2010639658 countsByYear W20106396582014 @default.
• W2010639658 countsByYear W20106396582017 @default.
• W2010639658 countsByYear W20106396582018 @default.
• W2010639658 countsByYear W20106396582023 @default.
• W2010639658 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2010639658 hasAuthorship W2010639658A5002868180 @default.
• W2010639658 hasAuthorship W2010639658A5055044637 @default.
• W2010639658 hasBestOaLocation W20106396581 @default.
• W2010639658 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2010639658 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2010639658 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2010639658 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2010639658 hasConcept C2776106345 @default.
• W2010639658 hasConcept C2777202286 @default.
• W2010639658 hasConcept C2779974597 @default.
• W2010639658 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2010639658 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2010639658 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2010639658 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2010639658 hasConceptScore W2010639658C141071460 @default.
• W2010639658 hasConceptScore W2010639658C159110408 @default.
• W2010639658 hasConceptScore W2010639658C1862650 @default.
• W2010639658 hasConceptScore W2010639658C27415008 @default.
• W2010639658 hasConceptScore W2010639658C2776106345 @default.
• W2010639658 hasConceptScore W2010639658C2777202286 @default.
• W2010639658 hasConceptScore W2010639658C2779974597 @default.
• W2010639658 hasConceptScore W2010639658C2908647359 @default.
• W2010639658 hasConceptScore W2010639658C61434518 @default.
• W2010639658 hasConceptScore W2010639658C71924100 @default.
• W2010639658 hasConceptScore W2010639658C99454951 @default.
• W2010639658 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2010639658 hasLocation W20106396581 @default.
• W2010639658 hasLocation W20106396582 @default.
• W2010639658 hasOpenAccess W2010639658 @default.
• W2010639658 hasPrimaryLocation W20106396581 @default.
• W2010639658 hasRelatedWork W2000117684 @default.
• W2010639658 hasRelatedWork W2081814204 @default.
• W2010639658 hasRelatedWork W2350610078 @default.
• W2010639658 hasRelatedWork W2358492318 @default.
• W2010639658 hasRelatedWork W2358568816 @default.
• W2010639658 hasRelatedWork W2413090889 @default.
• W2010639658 hasRelatedWork W2414366497 @default.
• W2010639658 hasRelatedWork W2418773300 @default.
• W2010639658 hasRelatedWork W2916553901 @default.
• W2010639658 hasRelatedWork W899595869 @default.
• W2010639658 hasVolume "1" @default.
• W2010639658 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2010639658 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2010639658 magId "2010639658" @default.
• W2010639658 workType "article" @default.