FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2010677060> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2010677060 abstract "Geographical interest in forms of social deviance is of comparatively recent origin, despite the fact that the relevance of spatial qualities has long been recognized. The concept of delinquency area remains a viable part of the literature and deserves closer attention by social geographers. Although analyses at the aggregate scale, based upon published statistics, remain valid and have considerable potential, there is a need to form new research strategies which both conduct analyses at the individual scale and improve the quality of data. Such a research strategy has been developed in a study of Cardiff and a set of research hypotheses relating to area differences, primarily in terms of attitudes and forms of behaviour, are tested. Results suggest that area differences exist and that the social geographical perspective is highly relevant to research in this field. A RESEARCH interest by professional geographers in the field of deviance studies is of comparatively recent origin,1 despite the fact that other disciplines have often recognized the relevance of spatial factors. Definitions of social deviance refer to normative rules for behaviour which in some ways have been infringed.2 Whilst social deviance is a generic term and there is little case for ignoring its typologies, there are grounds for recognizing broad bases of similarity and the fact that specific forms of deviance are subsets of the whole to which common methodologies and conceptual frameworks may apply. Juvenile delinquency is a particular form of social deviance which involves the transgression of societal laws by young offenders;3 it is itself capable of further differentiation by parameters such as degree of seriousness of the offence. Most analyses of crime and delinquency rest upon official sources of data, the reliability and comprehensiveness of which have been the subject of considerable debate.4 Whatever their merits, these data sets provide the only sources of statistics and have to form the bases of much research. A recent research project in Cardiff has considered the spatial qualities of delinquent behaviour on several fronts.s Access to data from several official sources allowed the calculation of delinquency rates for small areas of the city and these have formed a basis for study of areal and ecological characteristics. The emphasis in this particular paper is upon that part of the overall project in which an attempt was made to advance beyond the established strategies of quantitative analyses of aggregate statistics in order to demonstrate how attitudes and forms of behaviour could be studied in the context of social geographical research. This has involved the establishment of an area sampling framework from which survey areas were selected for detailed investigation.6 Whilst the procedure is not novel and is soundly based in geographical literature,7 its application in this context has innovative qualities. The paper considers the ecological tradition in crimihology, discusses the possibilities of a behavioural approach, develops the particular research strategy employed with the related research hypotheses, and evaluates the results from the survey of selected areas in Cardiff. THE ECOLOGICAL TRADITION IN CRIMINOLOGY The fact that crime and delinquency display marked areal and ecological characteristics, in common with many other forms of social deviance, has been recognized for some considerable" @default.
• W2010677060 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2010677060 creator A5029562865 @default.
• W2010677060 date "1976-01-01" @default.
• W2010677060 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2010677060 title "The Study of Delinquency Areas: A Social Geographical Approach" @default.
• W2010677060 cites W1523585979 @default.
• W2010677060 cites W1984181734 @default.
• W2010677060 cites W2007176077 @default.
• W2010677060 cites W2020508482 @default.
• W2010677060 cites W2034301512 @default.
• W2010677060 cites W2051821701 @default.
• W2010677060 cites W2070035956 @default.
• W2010677060 cites W2078598686 @default.
• W2010677060 cites W2098735287 @default.
• W2010677060 cites W2136746535 @default.
• W2010677060 cites W2314304816 @default.
• W2010677060 cites W2317036787 @default.
• W2010677060 cites W2332260509 @default.
• W2010677060 cites W2333576701 @default.
• W2010677060 cites W2334686948 @default.
• W2010677060 cites W2342006331 @default.
• W2010677060 cites W2461872558 @default.
• W2010677060 cites W2588784553 @default.
• W2010677060 cites W2795690649 @default.
• W2010677060 cites W2796638160 @default.
• W2010677060 cites W590647593 @default.
• W2010677060 doi "https://doi.org/10.2307/621904" @default.
• W2010677060 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12157839" @default.
• W2010677060 hasPublicationYear "1976" @default.
• W2010677060 type Work @default.
• W2010677060 sameAs 2010677060 @default.
• W2010677060 citedByCount "20" @default.
• W2010677060 countsByYear W20106770602012 @default.
• W2010677060 countsByYear W20106770602015 @default.
• W2010677060 countsByYear W20106770602018 @default.
• W2010677060 countsByYear W20106770602019 @default.
• W2010677060 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2010677060 hasAuthorship W2010677060A5029562865 @default.
• W2010677060 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W2010677060 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2010677060 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2010677060 hasConcept C158154518 @default.
• W2010677060 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2010677060 hasConcept C177599991 @default.
• W2010677060 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2010677060 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2010677060 hasConcept C44725695 @default.
• W2010677060 hasConcept C71376074 @default.
• W2010677060 hasConcept C73484699 @default.
• W2010677060 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2010677060 hasConceptScore W2010677060C119857082 @default.
• W2010677060 hasConceptScore W2010677060C144024400 @default.
• W2010677060 hasConceptScore W2010677060C15744967 @default.
• W2010677060 hasConceptScore W2010677060C158154518 @default.
• W2010677060 hasConceptScore W2010677060C17744445 @default.
• W2010677060 hasConceptScore W2010677060C177599991 @default.
• W2010677060 hasConceptScore W2010677060C199539241 @default.
• W2010677060 hasConceptScore W2010677060C41008148 @default.
• W2010677060 hasConceptScore W2010677060C44725695 @default.
• W2010677060 hasConceptScore W2010677060C71376074 @default.
• W2010677060 hasConceptScore W2010677060C73484699 @default.
• W2010677060 hasConceptScore W2010677060C77805123 @default.
• W2010677060 hasLocation W20106770601 @default.
• W2010677060 hasLocation W20106770602 @default.
• W2010677060 hasOpenAccess W2010677060 @default.
• W2010677060 hasPrimaryLocation W20106770601 @default.
• W2010677060 hasRelatedWork W2014654701 @default.
• W2010677060 hasRelatedWork W2046440778 @default.
• W2010677060 hasRelatedWork W2058689332 @default.
• W2010677060 hasRelatedWork W2198638331 @default.
• W2010677060 hasRelatedWork W2204829180 @default.
• W2010677060 hasRelatedWork W2218492882 @default.
• W2010677060 hasRelatedWork W2219559492 @default.
• W2010677060 hasRelatedWork W2276920220 @default.
• W2010677060 hasRelatedWork W2278562392 @default.
• W2010677060 hasRelatedWork W2279100175 @default.
• W2010677060 hasRelatedWork W2280052582 @default.
• W2010677060 hasRelatedWork W2305235590 @default.
• W2010677060 hasRelatedWork W2331900882 @default.
• W2010677060 hasRelatedWork W2216860605 @default.
• W2010677060 hasRelatedWork W2216870820 @default.
• W2010677060 hasRelatedWork W2217075455 @default.
• W2010677060 hasRelatedWork W2610117204 @default.
• W2010677060 hasRelatedWork W2621385962 @default.
• W2010677060 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2010677060 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2010677060 magId "2010677060" @default.
• W2010677060 workType "article" @default.