FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2010960535> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2010960535 endingPage "459" @default.
• W2010960535 startingPage "451" @default.
• W2010960535 abstract "•Cone-beam computed tomography images are accurate for evaluating adenoid size compared with nasoendoscopy (ICC, 0.80; 95% CI, ± 0.15). •Cone-beam computed tomography evaluations are reliable between repeated evaluations from 1 person (intraobserver ICC, 0.85; 95% CI, ± 0.08) and among several observers (interobserver ICC, 0.836; 95% CI, ± 0.084). •Cone-beam computed tomography can accurately identify clinically relevant adenoid hypertrophy with 88% sensitivity and 93% specificity. •In the hands of orthodontists trained to look at adenoid size in relation to postnasal space, cone-beam computed tomography approaches the accuracy and reliability of nasoendoscopy. Introduction The goals of this study were to evaluate (1) the reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for assessing adenoid size compared with nasoendoscopy and (2) the influence of clinical experience on CBCT diagnosis. Methods Adenoid size was graded on a 4-point scale for CBCT and nasoendoscopy by a pediatric otolaryngologist. Reliability was assessed with intraobserver and interobserver agreement. Accuracy was assessed with agreement between CBCT and nasoendoscopy, plus sensitivity and specificity analyses. The CBCT assessments were completed by a team of 4 evaluators: an oral and maxillofacial radiologist, an airway orthodontist who participates in the multidisciplinary team, an academic orthodontist whose primary research is in 3-dimensional imaging, and a highly experienced private practice orthodontist comfortable with CBCT imaging. Each evaluator was specifically chosen to represent a unique set of clinical and radiographic experiences. All evaluators were blinded to the subject's identity and clinical history, and they evaluated the images in a unique random order and evaluated each image 3 times separated by a minimum of 7 days. The same computer hardware and software were used. Results Thirty-nine consecutively assessed, nonsyndromic subjects (ages, 11.5 ± 2.8 years) were evaluated. The CBCT demonstrated excellent sensitivity (88%) and specificity (93%), strong accuracy (ICC, 0.80; 95% CI, ± 0.15), and good reliability, both within observers (ICC, 0.85; 95% CI, ± 0.08) and between observers (ICC, 0.84; 95% CI, ± 0.08). The clinical experience of the CBCT evaluator did not have a statistically significant effect. Conclusions CBCT is a reliable and accurate tool for identifying adenoid hypertrophy." @default.
• W2010960535 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2010960535 creator A5008858362 @default.
• W2010960535 creator A5032861651 @default.
• W2010960535 creator A5085720790 @default.
• W2010960535 creator A5086007362 @default.
• W2010960535 creator A5087583381 @default.
• W2010960535 date "2014-10-01" @default.
• W2010960535 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W2010960535 title "Agreement between cone-beam computed tomography and nasoendoscopy evaluations of adenoid hypertrophy" @default.
• W2010960535 cites W124849090 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W1535943284 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W1774217388 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W1965445784 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W1969994838 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W1974246118 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W1983505186 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W2004068300 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W2014347113 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W2020712660 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W2028271729 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W2032081375 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W2042113963 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W2042449440 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W2047572051 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W2054417035 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W2057339965 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W2060176797 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W2064030793 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W2078202430 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W2078328884 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W2080198269 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W2083470662 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W2087225497 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W2091087005 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W2091487827 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W2091813913 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W2096010498 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W2097475078 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W2101645693 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W2102787926 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W2103373997 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W2106512780 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W2114776577 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W2122474819 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W2125180090 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W2141254943 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W2143047626 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W2145148836 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W2147504878 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W2164684674 @default.
• W2010960535 cites W4243260104 @default.
• W2010960535 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.06.013" @default.
• W2010960535 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25263148" @default.
• W2010960535 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2010960535 type Work @default.
• W2010960535 sameAs 2010960535 @default.
• W2010960535 citedByCount "22" @default.
• W2010960535 countsByYear W20109605352015 @default.
• W2010960535 countsByYear W20109605352016 @default.
• W2010960535 countsByYear W20109605352017 @default.
• W2010960535 countsByYear W20109605352018 @default.
• W2010960535 countsByYear W20109605352019 @default.
• W2010960535 countsByYear W20109605352020 @default.
• W2010960535 countsByYear W20109605352021 @default.
• W2010960535 countsByYear W20109605352022 @default.
• W2010960535 countsByYear W20109605352023 @default.
• W2010960535 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2010960535 hasAuthorship W2010960535A5008858362 @default.
• W2010960535 hasAuthorship W2010960535A5032861651 @default.
• W2010960535 hasAuthorship W2010960535A5085720790 @default.
• W2010960535 hasAuthorship W2010960535A5086007362 @default.
• W2010960535 hasAuthorship W2010960535A5087583381 @default.
• W2010960535 hasConcept C108516343 @default.
• W2010960535 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2010960535 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2010960535 hasConcept C2776008533 @default.
• W2010960535 hasConcept C2777346780 @default.
• W2010960535 hasConcept C2779073326 @default.
• W2010960535 hasConcept C2779813781 @default.
• W2010960535 hasConcept C2781163425 @default.
• W2010960535 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2010960535 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2010960535 hasConcept C544519230 @default.
• W2010960535 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2010960535 hasConceptScore W2010960535C108516343 @default.
• W2010960535 hasConceptScore W2010960535C126838900 @default.
• W2010960535 hasConceptScore W2010960535C141071460 @default.
• W2010960535 hasConceptScore W2010960535C2776008533 @default.
• W2010960535 hasConceptScore W2010960535C2777346780 @default.
• W2010960535 hasConceptScore W2010960535C2779073326 @default.
• W2010960535 hasConceptScore W2010960535C2779813781 @default.
• W2010960535 hasConceptScore W2010960535C2781163425 @default.
• W2010960535 hasConceptScore W2010960535C29694066 @default.
• W2010960535 hasConceptScore W2010960535C2989005 @default.
• W2010960535 hasConceptScore W2010960535C544519230 @default.
• W2010960535 hasConceptScore W2010960535C71924100 @default.
• W2010960535 hasIssue "4" @default.

• next