FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2010991985> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2010991985 endingPage "1556" @default.
• W2010991985 startingPage "1556" @default.
• W2010991985 abstract "<h3>Abstract</h3> <b>Objectives:</b> To compare the quality of clinical care in walk-in centres with that provided in general practice and by NHS Direct. <b>Design:</b> Observational study involving assessment of clinicians by standardised patients. <b>Setting:</b> 20 walk-in centres, 20 general practices, and 11 NHS Direct sites. <b>Participants:</b> 297 consultations with standardised patients, 99 in each setting, carried out by professional role players trained to play five clinical scenarios (postcoital contraception, chest pain, sinusitis, headache, and asthma). <b>Main outcome measures:</b> Primary outcomes were mean scores on consensus derived checklists of essential items for the management of the clinical scenarios. Data were also collected on access to and referral by walk-in centres, general practices, and NHS Direct. <b>Results:</b> Walk-in centres achieved a significantly greater mean score for all scenarios combined than general practices (difference between groups 8.2, 95% confidence interval 1.7 to 14.6) and NHS Direct (10.8, 5.5 to 16.1). There was considerable between scenario variation, with walk-in centres performing particularly well on postcoital contraception and asthma scenarios. In contrast to general practices, walk-in centres and NHS Direct referred a higher proportion of patients (26% and 82%, respectively). <b>Conclusion:</b> Walk-in centres perform adequately and safely compared with general practices and NHS Direct for the range of conditions under study, but the impact of referrals on workload of other healthcare providers requires further research. <h3>What is already known on this topic</h3> Assessment of the quality of care provided by walk-in centres is an important part of their overall evaluation The one previous study to assess quality in this setting reported negative findings but was methodologically flawed Standardised patients are a valid and reliable method of assessment of quality of clinical care <h3>What this study adds</h3> Walk-in centres perform adequately and safely compared to general practice and NHS Direct for the range of conditions under study" @default.
• W2010991985 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2010991985 creator A5024642607 @default.
• W2010991985 creator A5057227631 @default.
• W2010991985 creator A5061146026 @default.
• W2010991985 creator A5079124087 @default.
• W2010991985 date "2002-06-29" @default.
• W2010991985 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2010991985 title "An observational study comparing quality of care in walk-in centres with general practice and NHS Direct using standardised patients" @default.
• W2010991985 cites W1823361870 @default.
• W2010991985 cites W188652462 @default.
• W2010991985 cites W1914425800 @default.
• W2010991985 cites W1964112202 @default.
• W2010991985 cites W1993902198 @default.
• W2010991985 cites W1998788840 @default.
• W2010991985 cites W2026910580 @default.
• W2010991985 cites W2046761388 @default.
• W2010991985 cites W2048077883 @default.
• W2010991985 cites W2050533250 @default.
• W2010991985 cites W2072162015 @default.
• W2010991985 cites W2085627088 @default.
• W2010991985 cites W2104029906 @default.
• W2010991985 cites W2111511279 @default.
• W2010991985 cites W2192816303 @default.
• W2010991985 cites W2316347474 @default.
• W2010991985 cites W2417107674 @default.
• W2010991985 cites W2417268739 @default.
• W2010991985 cites W2467089363 @default.
• W2010991985 cites W4290360344 @default.
• W2010991985 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7353.1556" @default.
• W2010991985 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/116613" @default.
• W2010991985 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12089094" @default.
• W2010991985 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W2010991985 type Work @default.
• W2010991985 sameAs 2010991985 @default.
• W2010991985 citedByCount "53" @default.
• W2010991985 countsByYear W20109919852012 @default.
• W2010991985 countsByYear W20109919852013 @default.
• W2010991985 countsByYear W20109919852014 @default.
• W2010991985 countsByYear W20109919852015 @default.
• W2010991985 countsByYear W20109919852016 @default.
• W2010991985 countsByYear W20109919852017 @default.
• W2010991985 countsByYear W20109919852019 @default.
• W2010991985 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2010991985 hasAuthorship W2010991985A5024642607 @default.
• W2010991985 hasAuthorship W2010991985A5057227631 @default.
• W2010991985 hasAuthorship W2010991985A5061146026 @default.
• W2010991985 hasAuthorship W2010991985A5079124087 @default.
• W2010991985 hasBestOaLocation W20109919851 @default.
• W2010991985 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2010991985 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2010991985 hasConcept C187212893 @default.
• W2010991985 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
• W2010991985 hasConcept C2776135927 @default.
• W2010991985 hasConcept C2778476105 @default.
• W2010991985 hasConcept C2781318095 @default.
• W2010991985 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2010991985 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2010991985 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2010991985 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2010991985 hasConceptScore W2010991985C111919701 @default.
• W2010991985 hasConceptScore W2010991985C126322002 @default.
• W2010991985 hasConceptScore W2010991985C187212893 @default.
• W2010991985 hasConceptScore W2010991985C23131810 @default.
• W2010991985 hasConceptScore W2010991985C2776135927 @default.
• W2010991985 hasConceptScore W2010991985C2778476105 @default.
• W2010991985 hasConceptScore W2010991985C2781318095 @default.
• W2010991985 hasConceptScore W2010991985C41008148 @default.
• W2010991985 hasConceptScore W2010991985C44249647 @default.
• W2010991985 hasConceptScore W2010991985C512399662 @default.
• W2010991985 hasConceptScore W2010991985C71924100 @default.
• W2010991985 hasIssue "7353" @default.
• W2010991985 hasLocation W20109919851 @default.
• W2010991985 hasLocation W20109919852 @default.
• W2010991985 hasLocation W20109919853 @default.
• W2010991985 hasLocation W20109919854 @default.
• W2010991985 hasOpenAccess W2010991985 @default.
• W2010991985 hasPrimaryLocation W20109919851 @default.
• W2010991985 hasRelatedWork W1918514426 @default.
• W2010991985 hasRelatedWork W1921509041 @default.
• W2010991985 hasRelatedWork W1992945148 @default.
• W2010991985 hasRelatedWork W2067289106 @default.
• W2010991985 hasRelatedWork W2135164634 @default.
• W2010991985 hasRelatedWork W2151754970 @default.
• W2010991985 hasRelatedWork W2402354881 @default.
• W2010991985 hasRelatedWork W2418114908 @default.
• W2010991985 hasRelatedWork W2599603829 @default.
• W2010991985 hasRelatedWork W993343848 @default.
• W2010991985 hasVolume "324" @default.
• W2010991985 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2010991985 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2010991985 magId "2010991985" @default.
• W2010991985 workType "article" @default.