Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2011091504> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 70 of
70
with 100 items per page.
- W2011091504 endingPage "194" @default.
- W2011091504 startingPage "183" @default.
- W2011091504 abstract "An in-home lamb study evaluated ratings from lamb consumers as influenced by cut (blade chop, rib chop, loin chop or leg chop), preparation method (indoor/outdoor grill, broil/oven roasted, pan-broil/pan-fry or other), and degree of doneness (medium rare or less, medium, medium well or more). Consumers in Dallas and Houston, Texas (n = 60 households) evaluated each cut for Overall-like (OLIKE), Tenderness (TEND), Juiciness (JUIC), Flavor Intensity (IFLAV), and Flavor Desirability (DFLAV) using 10-point scales (10 = extreme like, extremely tender, extremely juicy, extremely intense, and extremely desirable; 1 = extreme dislike, extremely tough, extremely dry, extremely bland, and extremely undesirable). No two-way or three-way interactions were observed between cut, preparation method and degree of doneness. Type of cut influenced (P < 0.05) palatability as consumers gave rib and loin chops higher ratings than chops from the blade or leg for OLIKE, TEND, JUIC, and DFLAV. Preparation method tended (P = 0.0565) to influence IFLAV with pan-broiled/pan-fried chops receiving higher ratings than grilled chops or chops cooked using “other” methods. Degree of doneness affected (P < 0.05) JUIC and tended (P = 0.0639) to affect TEND with chops that were cooked to lower degrees of doneness rated higher. Correlation data showed that OLIKE was highly correlated with TEND (r = 0.82), DFLAV (r = 0.82), and JUIC (r = 0.76), but did not have a strong relationship with IFLAV (r = 0.25). This information provides some insight into factors driving consumer evaluations of lamb." @default.
- W2011091504 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2011091504 creator A5024454005 @default.
- W2011091504 creator A5040495948 @default.
- W2011091504 creator A5044766373 @default.
- W2011091504 date "2004-09-01" @default.
- W2011091504 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W2011091504 title "IN-HOME CONSUMER EVALUATIONS OF FOUR LAMB RETAIL CUTS" @default.
- W2011091504 cites W1595262077 @default.
- W2011091504 cites W1987093496 @default.
- W2011091504 cites W2068865816 @default.
- W2011091504 cites W2106697968 @default.
- W2011091504 cites W4246075095 @default.
- W2011091504 cites W4253302385 @default.
- W2011091504 cites W87116856 @default.
- W2011091504 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4573.2004.tb00683.x" @default.
- W2011091504 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
- W2011091504 type Work @default.
- W2011091504 sameAs 2011091504 @default.
- W2011091504 citedByCount "1" @default.
- W2011091504 countsByYear W20110915042020 @default.
- W2011091504 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2011091504 hasAuthorship W2011091504A5024454005 @default.
- W2011091504 hasAuthorship W2011091504A5040495948 @default.
- W2011091504 hasAuthorship W2011091504A5044766373 @default.
- W2011091504 hasConcept C140793950 @default.
- W2011091504 hasConcept C158617107 @default.
- W2011091504 hasConcept C172873279 @default.
- W2011091504 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
- W2011091504 hasConcept C2777449483 @default.
- W2011091504 hasConcept C2779725641 @default.
- W2011091504 hasConcept C2780003869 @default.
- W2011091504 hasConcept C2780719635 @default.
- W2011091504 hasConcept C31903555 @default.
- W2011091504 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W2011091504 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
- W2011091504 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2011091504 hasConceptScore W2011091504C140793950 @default.
- W2011091504 hasConceptScore W2011091504C158617107 @default.
- W2011091504 hasConceptScore W2011091504C172873279 @default.
- W2011091504 hasConceptScore W2011091504C185592680 @default.
- W2011091504 hasConceptScore W2011091504C2777449483 @default.
- W2011091504 hasConceptScore W2011091504C2779725641 @default.
- W2011091504 hasConceptScore W2011091504C2780003869 @default.
- W2011091504 hasConceptScore W2011091504C2780719635 @default.
- W2011091504 hasConceptScore W2011091504C31903555 @default.
- W2011091504 hasConceptScore W2011091504C33923547 @default.
- W2011091504 hasConceptScore W2011091504C55493867 @default.
- W2011091504 hasConceptScore W2011091504C86803240 @default.
- W2011091504 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2011091504 hasLocation W20110915041 @default.
- W2011091504 hasOpenAccess W2011091504 @default.
- W2011091504 hasPrimaryLocation W20110915041 @default.
- W2011091504 hasRelatedWork W2092161897 @default.
- W2011091504 hasRelatedWork W2139056296 @default.
- W2011091504 hasRelatedWork W2147199321 @default.
- W2011091504 hasRelatedWork W262749743 @default.
- W2011091504 hasRelatedWork W2953851094 @default.
- W2011091504 hasRelatedWork W2987672822 @default.
- W2011091504 hasRelatedWork W3013236869 @default.
- W2011091504 hasRelatedWork W3093311769 @default.
- W2011091504 hasRelatedWork W349363198 @default.
- W2011091504 hasRelatedWork W4252425156 @default.
- W2011091504 hasVolume "15" @default.
- W2011091504 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2011091504 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2011091504 magId "2011091504" @default.
- W2011091504 workType "article" @default.