FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2011121298> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2011121298 endingPage "307" @default.
• W2011121298 startingPage "295" @default.
• W2011121298 abstract "All research domains are based upon epistemological assumptions. Periodic reassessment of these assumptions is crucial because they influence how we interpret experimental outcomes. Perhaps nowhere is this reassessment needed more than in the study of prayer and intention experiments. For if positive results from this field of research are sustained, the reality of nonlocal consciousness must be confronted. This paper explores the current status of healing and intention research, citing a number of major studies and using the “Study of the Therapeutic Effects of Intercessory Prayer (STEP) in Cardiac Bypass Surgery Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Uncertainty and Certainty of Receiving Intercessory Prayer” as a case study of this line of research. The paper argues that the dose-dependent model typical of drug trials, and adopted for use in the STEP and other studies, is not the optimal model for intention-healing research, and critiques this approach in detail, citing apposite research from which we draw our recommendations and conclusions. The paper suggests that the usual assumptions concerning blindness and randomization that prevail in studies using the pharmacological model must be reappraised. Experimental data suggest that a nonlocal relationship exists among the various individuals participating in a study, one which needs to be understood and taken seriously. We argue that it is important to account for and understand the role of both local and nonlocal observer effects, since both can significantly affect outcome. Research is presented from an array of disciplines to support why the authors feel these issues of linkage, belief, and intention are so important to a successful, accurate, and meaningful study outcome. Finally, the paper offers suggestions for new lines of research and new protocol designs that address these observer-effect issues, particularly the nonlocal aspects. The paper finally suggests that if these effects occur in intention studies, they must necessarily exist in all studies, although in pharmacological studies they are often overshadowed by the power of chemical and biological agents." @default.
• W2011121298 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2011121298 creator A5006519300 @default.
• W2011121298 creator A5069823739 @default.
• W2011121298 date "2010-09-01" @default.
• W2011121298 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2011121298 title "Nonlocality, Intention, and Observer Effects in Healing Studies: Laying a Foundation for the Future" @default.
• W2011121298 cites W1965459365 @default.
• W2011121298 cites W1981756711 @default.
• W2011121298 cites W1987712315 @default.
• W2011121298 cites W2007866884 @default.
• W2011121298 cites W2011953456 @default.
• W2011121298 cites W2017514236 @default.
• W2011121298 cites W2043294139 @default.
• W2011121298 cites W2045352737 @default.
• W2011121298 cites W2057752024 @default.
• W2011121298 cites W2073189683 @default.
• W2011121298 cites W2078275603 @default.
• W2011121298 cites W2086658920 @default.
• W2011121298 cites W2087886840 @default.
• W2011121298 cites W2095661129 @default.
• W2011121298 cites W2097193960 @default.
• W2011121298 cites W2103314652 @default.
• W2011121298 cites W2104146277 @default.
• W2011121298 cites W2104260386 @default.
• W2011121298 cites W2126714430 @default.
• W2011121298 cites W2145595162 @default.
• W2011121298 cites W2149010311 @default.
• W2011121298 cites W2162152186 @default.
• W2011121298 cites W2169572847 @default.
• W2011121298 cites W2410160400 @default.
• W2011121298 cites W4241250208 @default.
• W2011121298 cites W4376849719 @default.
• W2011121298 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2010.06.011" @default.
• W2011121298 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20832762" @default.
• W2011121298 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2011121298 type Work @default.
• W2011121298 sameAs 2011121298 @default.
• W2011121298 citedByCount "35" @default.
• W2011121298 countsByYear W20111212982012 @default.
• W2011121298 countsByYear W20111212982013 @default.
• W2011121298 countsByYear W20111212982014 @default.
• W2011121298 countsByYear W20111212982015 @default.
• W2011121298 countsByYear W20111212982016 @default.
• W2011121298 countsByYear W20111212982017 @default.
• W2011121298 countsByYear W20111212982018 @default.
• W2011121298 countsByYear W20111212982019 @default.
• W2011121298 countsByYear W20111212982020 @default.
• W2011121298 countsByYear W20111212982021 @default.
• W2011121298 countsByYear W20111212982022 @default.
• W2011121298 countsByYear W20111212982023 @default.
• W2011121298 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2011121298 hasAuthorship W2011121298A5006519300 @default.
• W2011121298 hasAuthorship W2011121298A5069823739 @default.
• W2011121298 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2011121298 hasConcept C118084267 @default.
• W2011121298 hasConcept C119767625 @default.
• W2011121298 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2011121298 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2011121298 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2011121298 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2011121298 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2011121298 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2011121298 hasConcept C24667770 @default.
• W2011121298 hasConcept C2777477151 @default.
• W2011121298 hasConcept C2780929884 @default.
• W2011121298 hasConcept C2780966255 @default.
• W2011121298 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
• W2011121298 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2011121298 hasConcept C7493553 @default.
• W2011121298 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2011121298 hasConceptScore W2011121298C111472728 @default.
• W2011121298 hasConceptScore W2011121298C118084267 @default.
• W2011121298 hasConceptScore W2011121298C119767625 @default.
• W2011121298 hasConceptScore W2011121298C138885662 @default.
• W2011121298 hasConceptScore W2011121298C15744967 @default.
• W2011121298 hasConceptScore W2011121298C162324750 @default.
• W2011121298 hasConceptScore W2011121298C17744445 @default.
• W2011121298 hasConceptScore W2011121298C180747234 @default.
• W2011121298 hasConceptScore W2011121298C199539241 @default.
• W2011121298 hasConceptScore W2011121298C24667770 @default.
• W2011121298 hasConceptScore W2011121298C2777477151 @default.
• W2011121298 hasConceptScore W2011121298C2780929884 @default.
• W2011121298 hasConceptScore W2011121298C2780966255 @default.
• W2011121298 hasConceptScore W2011121298C542102704 @default.
• W2011121298 hasConceptScore W2011121298C71924100 @default.
• W2011121298 hasConceptScore W2011121298C7493553 @default.
• W2011121298 hasConceptScore W2011121298C77805123 @default.
• W2011121298 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2011121298 hasLocation W20111212981 @default.
• W2011121298 hasLocation W20111212982 @default.
• W2011121298 hasOpenAccess W2011121298 @default.
• W2011121298 hasPrimaryLocation W20111212981 @default.
• W2011121298 hasRelatedWork W1497171668 @default.
• W2011121298 hasRelatedWork W1964206980 @default.
• W2011121298 hasRelatedWork W2010073985 @default.
• W2011121298 hasRelatedWork W2031899745 @default.
• W2011121298 hasRelatedWork W2131788636 @default.

• next