FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2011302533> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2011302533 endingPage "544.e7" @default.
• W2011302533 startingPage "544.e1" @default.
• W2011302533 abstract "Objective The guided outcomes in learned efficiency (GOLE) model emphasizes the use of evidence-based resources to understand the diagnosis, treatment, follow-up, and prevention of disease. We seek to determine whether presentations created using the GOLE model are superior to an unstructured approach in achieving Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Core Competencies. Study Design Consenting medical students were randomized to GOLE or control groups to individually research a self-selected clinical topic. A validated survey instrument was used prepresentation and postpresentation to assess perceived improvement in knowledge. Subjects completed self-evaluations at enrollment and after presentation of their chosen clinical topic. Other students, residents, and a faculty member also completed evaluations after each student presentation. Standard statistical methods (analysis of variance, 2-tailed t test) were used to determine if a statistically significant difference existed between intervention and control groups. Results Self-assessments were similar in the GOLE and control groups. Externally perceived presentation scores were greater in the GOLE group (ACGME global P < .0001, presentation global P = .07), which demonstrated a significant improvement in 5 core competencies. Time spent preparing the presentation and resources utilized did not differ between groups. Conclusion The presentations prepared using the GOLE model were rated higher by observers than those prepared using traditional techniques. The guided outcomes in learned efficiency (GOLE) model emphasizes the use of evidence-based resources to understand the diagnosis, treatment, follow-up, and prevention of disease. We seek to determine whether presentations created using the GOLE model are superior to an unstructured approach in achieving Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Core Competencies. Consenting medical students were randomized to GOLE or control groups to individually research a self-selected clinical topic. A validated survey instrument was used prepresentation and postpresentation to assess perceived improvement in knowledge. Subjects completed self-evaluations at enrollment and after presentation of their chosen clinical topic. Other students, residents, and a faculty member also completed evaluations after each student presentation. Standard statistical methods (analysis of variance, 2-tailed t test) were used to determine if a statistically significant difference existed between intervention and control groups. Self-assessments were similar in the GOLE and control groups. Externally perceived presentation scores were greater in the GOLE group (ACGME global P < .0001, presentation global P = .07), which demonstrated a significant improvement in 5 core competencies. Time spent preparing the presentation and resources utilized did not differ between groups. The presentations prepared using the GOLE model were rated higher by observers than those prepared using traditional techniques." @default.
• W2011302533 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2011302533 creator A5026060508 @default.
• W2011302533 creator A5028634420 @default.
• W2011302533 creator A5043065014 @default.
• W2011302533 creator A5047106954 @default.
• W2011302533 creator A5047561044 @default.
• W2011302533 creator A5073331548 @default.
• W2011302533 creator A5088284647 @default.
• W2011302533 date "2014-11-01" @default.
• W2011302533 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2011302533 title "Guided outcomes in learned efficiency model in clinical medical education: a randomized controlled trial of self-regulated learning" @default.
• W2011302533 cites W1594368670 @default.
• W2011302533 cites W1977362803 @default.
• W2011302533 cites W1985424046 @default.
• W2011302533 cites W2007076918 @default.
• W2011302533 cites W2009624591 @default.
• W2011302533 cites W2016306293 @default.
• W2011302533 cites W2020199012 @default.
• W2011302533 cites W2039667345 @default.
• W2011302533 cites W2071370611 @default.
• W2011302533 cites W2075498876 @default.
• W2011302533 cites W2081834971 @default.
• W2011302533 cites W2084057771 @default.
• W2011302533 cites W2146344970 @default.
• W2011302533 cites W2167214374 @default.
• W2011302533 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.05.048" @default.
• W2011302533 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24907703" @default.
• W2011302533 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2011302533 type Work @default.
• W2011302533 sameAs 2011302533 @default.
• W2011302533 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2011302533 countsByYear W20113025332016 @default.
• W2011302533 countsByYear W20113025332023 @default.
• W2011302533 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2011302533 hasAuthorship W2011302533A5026060508 @default.
• W2011302533 hasAuthorship W2011302533A5028634420 @default.
• W2011302533 hasAuthorship W2011302533A5043065014 @default.
• W2011302533 hasAuthorship W2011302533A5047106954 @default.
• W2011302533 hasAuthorship W2011302533A5047561044 @default.
• W2011302533 hasAuthorship W2011302533A5073331548 @default.
• W2011302533 hasAuthorship W2011302533A5088284647 @default.
• W2011302533 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2011302533 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2011302533 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2011302533 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2011302533 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2011302533 hasConcept C164065428 @default.
• W2011302533 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2011302533 hasConcept C2777601897 @default.
• W2011302533 hasConcept C2779767262 @default.
• W2011302533 hasConcept C2780665704 @default.
• W2011302533 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2011302533 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2011302533 hasConcept C61521584 @default.
• W2011302533 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2011302533 hasConceptScore W2011302533C126322002 @default.
• W2011302533 hasConceptScore W2011302533C141071460 @default.
• W2011302533 hasConceptScore W2011302533C144133560 @default.
• W2011302533 hasConceptScore W2011302533C159110408 @default.
• W2011302533 hasConceptScore W2011302533C162853370 @default.
• W2011302533 hasConceptScore W2011302533C164065428 @default.
• W2011302533 hasConceptScore W2011302533C168563851 @default.
• W2011302533 hasConceptScore W2011302533C2777601897 @default.
• W2011302533 hasConceptScore W2011302533C2779767262 @default.
• W2011302533 hasConceptScore W2011302533C2780665704 @default.
• W2011302533 hasConceptScore W2011302533C509550671 @default.
• W2011302533 hasConceptScore W2011302533C512399662 @default.
• W2011302533 hasConceptScore W2011302533C61521584 @default.
• W2011302533 hasConceptScore W2011302533C71924100 @default.
• W2011302533 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2011302533 hasLocation W20113025331 @default.
• W2011302533 hasLocation W20113025332 @default.
• W2011302533 hasOpenAccess W2011302533 @default.
• W2011302533 hasPrimaryLocation W20113025331 @default.
• W2011302533 hasRelatedWork W1510526097 @default.
• W2011302533 hasRelatedWork W2061932680 @default.
• W2011302533 hasRelatedWork W2063433155 @default.
• W2011302533 hasRelatedWork W2085042462 @default.
• W2011302533 hasRelatedWork W2086411908 @default.
• W2011302533 hasRelatedWork W2158101438 @default.
• W2011302533 hasRelatedWork W2166771479 @default.
• W2011302533 hasRelatedWork W2172289563 @default.
• W2011302533 hasRelatedWork W2313462721 @default.
• W2011302533 hasRelatedWork W2519250953 @default.
• W2011302533 hasVolume "211" @default.
• W2011302533 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2011302533 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2011302533 magId "2011302533" @default.
• W2011302533 workType "article" @default.