FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2011636986> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2011636986 abstract "Admiration, Enmity, and Cooperation: U.S. Navalism and the British and German Empires before the Great War Dirk Bönker I If we believe German naval officers, the United States was the exemplary navalist power by the turn of the twentieth century. U.S. leaders had recognized that they needed to turn their country into a premier imperial military power to secure its needs as an “export industrial state (Exportindustriestaat).” 1 Admiral Otto von Diederichs, the chief of the German Admiralty Staff, wrote admiringly in 1900 that “quietly” the United States had built so powerful a navy that it was now “well-entitled” to “have a powerful say in matters of world politics (Weltpolitik).” 2 The German secretary of the navy, Admiral Alfred von Tirpitz, noted two years later that America would “move forward in enormous strides (namely: politically);” it would manage to keep abreast of the overall “development towards a few global empires (Riesenreiche).” 3 From their distinct perspective, these German observers responded to the U.S. pursuit of imperial opportunity and maritime force before 1914. Like Imperial Germany, the United States had set out to acquire maritime military resources on an unprecedented level to make itself successful in new global spaces of economic rivalry, political conflict, and military competition among the major industrial nations. Like Germany, the United States had redefined the parameters of great power status and warfare through the practice of new forms of the wartime mobilization of peoples, ideologies, and industries by an integral nation state during the 1860s. Turning continental hegemony and superior industrial production into global power in the face of the “consolidation of global circuits of money, markets, knowledge, and force,” the United States had begun “to fuse the capacities of the national state for mobilization with the logistical capabilities of maritime power.” By the late 1900s, the United States had emerged as one of the world’s leading naval powers. By the end of the next decade, the United States had successfully staked out its claims to become the world’s first super power in the twentieth century. 4 This paper seeks to situate the U.S. navalist (and thus imperial) experience at the turn of the twentieth century within a larger transatlantic setting. The focus is on U.S. naval officers as makers and guardians of empire. These officers had promoted an oceanic “commercialist vision” of imperial expansion for most of the nineteenth century. 5 At its close, they fashioned navalism, which provided the discursive context for the making of the United States as a premier imperial power. The navy’s new collective ideology served as one important language of empire building by providing a set of terms and ideas about the interrelationship of sea power, economics, international politics, and expansion. 6 As champions of a new imperial war state, U.S. naval officers were firmly placed inside the developing industrial and organizational society in post-Civil War America. Naval professionals were part and parcel of an “emergent intelligentsia” of U.S. state builders in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries that was “rooted in a revitalized professional sector and a burgeoning university sector.” 7 In general, they considered themselves a political and social elite with a strong sense of a shared collective identity, forged through their naval service and underscored by a distinct lifestyle. Socially, this group was composed predominantly of the scions of the white and Protestant professional, commercial, and manufacturing elites of U.S. society. 8 The paper explores some of the ways in which U.S. naval officers frequently looked across the Atlantic toward Britain and Germany as they strove to devise naval policy and strategy and build an imperial war state for their own country as a new “world power,” to use their own term. 9 In doing so, the following exploration attempts to insert the United States into a transoceanic world of arms competition and empire building. The making of American sea power under navalist auspices was part and parcel of the broader, truly transnational militarization of the Western world before 1914. The pursuit of U.S. strategy took place in an Atlantic-wide (and transpacific) arena of military politics and great power..." @default.
• W2011636986 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2011636986 creator A5080642515 @default.
• W2011636986 date "2001-01-01" @default.
• W2011636986 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2011636986 title "Admiration, Enmity, and Cooperation: U.S. Navalism and the British and German Empires before the Great War" @default.
• W2011636986 cites W1500751478 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W1517702415 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W1537936541 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W1540843988 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W1590457203 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W1950704489 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W1969788129 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W1970547195 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W1972815446 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W1972899486 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W1976997229 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W1989872517 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W1989939996 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W1990849248 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2000572317 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2003949412 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2007406066 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2007416949 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2018732200 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2018990572 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2021001392 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2021487490 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2025686268 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2026694803 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2026750352 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2028342896 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2029181784 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2030799311 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2033695589 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2035675056 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2036457422 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2039104894 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2041563848 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2043048217 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2046572500 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2051913628 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2071308957 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2079588538 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2080187751 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2083255804 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2088664381 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2096517430 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2098970725 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2101807938 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2105250815 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2109064059 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2117026282 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2131612061 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2143628556 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2150341352 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2156757845 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2171160556 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2314590887 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2316627864 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2317205488 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2327392498 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2331915073 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2335429203 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2461662035 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2481923663 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2575671974 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2793444538 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2795383880 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2801306186 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2801789063 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2886910155 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2951733057 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2953272368 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2954816326 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W2991255366 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W579887686 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W608490255 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W614127680 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W619947019 @default.
• W2011636986 cites W657588882 @default.
• W2011636986 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/cch.2001.0002" @default.
• W2011636986 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
• W2011636986 type Work @default.
• W2011636986 sameAs 2011636986 @default.
• W2011636986 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2011636986 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2011636986 hasAuthorship W2011636986A5080642515 @default.
• W2011636986 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W2011636986 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2011636986 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W2011636986 hasConcept C137355542 @default.
• W2011636986 hasConcept C139719470 @default.
• W2011636986 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2011636986 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2011636986 hasConcept C154775046 @default.
• W2011636986 hasConcept C158071213 @default.
• W2011636986 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2011636986 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W2011636986 hasConcept C166957645 @default.

• next