FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2011920674> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2011920674 endingPage "159" @default.
• W2011920674 startingPage "159" @default.
• W2011920674 abstract "Are There Different Types of Homeless Families? A Typology of Homeless Families Based On Cluster Analysis* Evangeline R. Danseco and E. Wayne Holden** Cluster analysis was conducted using data from 180 families and 348 children participating in a comprehensive health care program for children in homeless families. Three empirically derived groups of homeless families were identified, with clusters primarily differentiated on previous history of homelessness, parenting stress, and major life stressors. One group displayed higher rates of parenting stress and major life concerns. Children in this group consistently exhibited greater behavior problems, compared with children in the other clusters, and showed a trend suggesting poorer cognitive, academic, and adaptive behavior outcomes. Children in the cluster of homeless families whose parents reported low parenting stress and low major life concerns exhibited better outcomes. Results are discussed within the context of developing more sophisticated multivariate models for specifying the effects of variations in homelessness and poverty in general on children and families. Key Words: child development, homelessness, parenting, poverty, resilience. Research on the effects of homelessness on children's educational, developmental. and mental health status has yielded inconsistent results. While some investigations have reported serious detrimental effects among the majority of children in homeless families (e.g., Bassuk & Rosenberg, 1990; Zima, Wells, & Freeman, 1994), others have reported more conservative estimates consistent with outcomes typically reported for children in impoverished, housed families (e.g., Masten, Miliotis, Graham-Berman, Ramirez, & Neeman, 1993; Rescorla, Parker, & Stolley, 1991). In a recent review of studies on the mental health of homeless children, Holden, Horton, and Danseco (1995) noted that such inconsistencies reflect conceptual and methodological limitations of research in this area. Recommendations were made for avoiding specific methodological pitfalls and utilizing existing frameworks in developmental psychopathology as conceptual bases for guiding research in this area. The lack of conceptual frameworks to guide research efforts in this area is one of the more serious limitations hindering our understanding of the effects of homelessness on children. Homelessness is often assumed to be a unitary phenomenon, with research methodologies and data analyses attempting to examine the main effects of homelessness on children's functioning. While this approach presents information that can be critical in highlighting the plight of homeless children, compared with poor but housed children, this approach does not assist in identifying aspects of family homelessness that may differentially affect children's mental health status. This paper presents an exploratory analysis to identify different types of homeless families through an empirical method and, second, to examine variations in children's outcomes among these types of homeless families. The development of a typology for homeless families aids our understanding of the mechanisms by which homelessness affects children in response to calls for research to focus on the processes by which poverty and other risk factors affect children (e.g., Bronfenbrenner, 1993; Garmezy, 1993; Huston, McLoyd, & Garcia Coll, 1994; Rutter, 1993). Moreover, obtaining empirically-derived categories of homeless families can verify descriptions of various types of homeless families often advanced in the literature. For example, the Institute of Medicine report (1988) described three patterns of homeless families based solely on descriptions of service providers and review of the literature. Similarly, Koegel and Burnam (1987) presented profiles of traditional and nontraditional homeless alcoholic adults. These types of homeless families were not empirically driven nor subjected to further analysis. …" @default.
• W2011920674 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2011920674 creator A5001535800 @default.
• W2011920674 creator A5037260207 @default.
• W2011920674 date "1998-04-01" @default.
• W2011920674 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2011920674 title "Are There Different Types of Homeless Families? A Typology of Homeless Families Based On Cluster Analysis" @default.
• W2011920674 cites W1489310010 @default.
• W2011920674 cites W1491342028 @default.
• W2011920674 cites W1572968795 @default.
• W2011920674 cites W1576556304 @default.
• W2011920674 cites W1978743055 @default.
• W2011920674 cites W1986762259 @default.
• W2011920674 cites W1989835920 @default.
• W2011920674 cites W1995334871 @default.
• W2011920674 cites W1996716987 @default.
• W2011920674 cites W2007360373 @default.
• W2011920674 cites W2024549350 @default.
• W2011920674 cites W2031552039 @default.
• W2011920674 cites W2043314808 @default.
• W2011920674 cites W2088387179 @default.
• W2011920674 cites W2103066851 @default.
• W2011920674 cites W2106486633 @default.
• W2011920674 cites W2149209542 @default.
• W2011920674 cites W2154084822 @default.
• W2011920674 cites W2417837440 @default.
• W2011920674 cites W2621368675 @default.
• W2011920674 cites W2782781084 @default.
• W2011920674 cites W2912242037 @default.
• W2011920674 cites W2927623529 @default.
• W2011920674 cites W3005297052 @default.
• W2011920674 doi "https://doi.org/10.2307/585620" @default.
• W2011920674 hasPublicationYear "1998" @default.
• W2011920674 type Work @default.
• W2011920674 sameAs 2011920674 @default.
• W2011920674 citedByCount "52" @default.
• W2011920674 countsByYear W20119206742012 @default.
• W2011920674 countsByYear W20119206742013 @default.
• W2011920674 countsByYear W20119206742014 @default.
• W2011920674 countsByYear W20119206742015 @default.
• W2011920674 countsByYear W20119206742016 @default.
• W2011920674 countsByYear W20119206742017 @default.
• W2011920674 countsByYear W20119206742019 @default.
• W2011920674 countsByYear W20119206742020 @default.
• W2011920674 countsByYear W20119206742021 @default.
• W2011920674 countsByYear W20119206742023 @default.
• W2011920674 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2011920674 hasAuthorship W2011920674A5001535800 @default.
• W2011920674 hasAuthorship W2011920674A5037260207 @default.
• W2011920674 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2011920674 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2011920674 hasConcept C164866538 @default.
• W2011920674 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W2011920674 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2011920674 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2011920674 hasConcept C75795011 @default.
• W2011920674 hasConceptScore W2011920674C144024400 @default.
• W2011920674 hasConceptScore W2011920674C15744967 @default.
• W2011920674 hasConceptScore W2011920674C164866538 @default.
• W2011920674 hasConceptScore W2011920674C19165224 @default.
• W2011920674 hasConceptScore W2011920674C199360897 @default.
• W2011920674 hasConceptScore W2011920674C41008148 @default.
• W2011920674 hasConceptScore W2011920674C75795011 @default.
• W2011920674 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2011920674 hasLocation W20119206741 @default.
• W2011920674 hasOpenAccess W2011920674 @default.
• W2011920674 hasPrimaryLocation W20119206741 @default.
• W2011920674 hasRelatedWork W1965164967 @default.
• W2011920674 hasRelatedWork W2014416321 @default.
• W2011920674 hasRelatedWork W2031024199 @default.
• W2011920674 hasRelatedWork W2056697236 @default.
• W2011920674 hasRelatedWork W2166726853 @default.
• W2011920674 hasRelatedWork W2324635848 @default.
• W2011920674 hasRelatedWork W2610866548 @default.
• W2011920674 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2011920674 hasRelatedWork W2927555317 @default.
• W2011920674 hasRelatedWork W3027751302 @default.
• W2011920674 hasVolume "47" @default.
• W2011920674 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2011920674 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2011920674 magId "2011920674" @default.
• W2011920674 workType "article" @default.