FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2011960350> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2011960350 endingPage "2164" @default.
• W2011960350 startingPage "2156" @default.
• W2011960350 abstract "This in vitro study was performed to determine the appropriate power output setting for an erbium, chromium-doped:yttrium, scandium, gallium, and garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser used in periodontal pocket irradiation by examining the morphologic alterations of the root surfaces and the efficiency of calculus removal.Sixty-five non-carious extracted human teeth were used in this study. For morphologic analysis of the root surface, the clean, single roots of 22 teeth were separated into 91 pieces, and these pieces were immersed in acrylic resin. The specimens with root-surface exposure were prepared and divided randomly into three groups: a control group (N=8), an irradiation without water group (no water [NW] group; N=39), and an irradiation in water to simulate the conditions in a periodontal pocket group (in water [IW] group; N=44). The power output settings for laser irradiation were 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 W for each group. The roughness (Ra), depth (Z), and width (X) of the disk specimens were determined after laser irradiation. Eight other single-rooted teeth were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) after laser irradiation under the same conditions. Thirty-five single- or multirooted teeth with heavy subgingival calculus were used to test the efficiency of laser scaling. The efficiency of calculus removal was quantified by measuring the time needed to remove the calculus completely using the laser.The mean Ra and Z values in the IW group were significantly higher than in the NW group with the same power output. In addition, these values with 0.5- and 1.0-W power output settings were significantly lower than with 1.5- and 2.0-W settings in the NW and IW groups. No obvious morphologic differences could be found between the 0.5- and 1.0-W power output specimens under SEM. Additionally, thermal alterations, i.e., carbonization or melting, were completely absent in the IW group. Regarding the efficiency of calculus removal, the 0.5-W setting (0.11+/-0.036 mm2/second) was significantly inferior to the 1.0-W setting (0.27+/-0.043 mm2/second). However, there was no significant difference between 1.0- and 1.5-W (0.36+/-0.11 mm2/second). The 2.0-W setting (0.63+/-0.272 mm2/second) was much more efficient but resulted in significant morphologic alterations.Based on these findings, it is appropriate to use a 1.0-W power output setting with an Er,Cr:YSGG laser for root scaling. This may be done without any conspicuous morphologic alterations to the root surface and with acceptably efficient removal of calculus." @default.
• W2011960350 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2011960350 creator A5031351145 @default.
• W2011960350 creator A5032157507 @default.
• W2011960350 creator A5038735209 @default.
• W2011960350 creator A5042842452 @default.
• W2011960350 creator A5048159286 @default.
• W2011960350 creator A5049160775 @default.
• W2011960350 date "2007-11-01" @default.
• W2011960350 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2011960350 title "Effects of Er,Cr:YSGG Laser Irradiation on the Root Surface: Morphologic Analysis and Efficiency of Calculus Removal" @default.
• W2011960350 cites W1588480874 @default.
• W2011960350 cites W1615088753 @default.
• W2011960350 cites W1967679324 @default.
• W2011960350 cites W1972922738 @default.
• W2011960350 cites W1976411523 @default.
• W2011960350 cites W1978941719 @default.
• W2011960350 cites W1984180446 @default.
• W2011960350 cites W1995327415 @default.
• W2011960350 cites W2010037159 @default.
• W2011960350 cites W2030280861 @default.
• W2011960350 cites W2031669616 @default.
• W2011960350 cites W2059314855 @default.
• W2011960350 cites W2061584874 @default.
• W2011960350 cites W2081036788 @default.
• W2011960350 cites W2083278718 @default.
• W2011960350 cites W2084926425 @default.
• W2011960350 cites W2086037473 @default.
• W2011960350 cites W2097763425 @default.
• W2011960350 cites W2098934298 @default.
• W2011960350 cites W2101810752 @default.
• W2011960350 cites W2113254231 @default.
• W2011960350 cites W2116003583 @default.
• W2011960350 cites W2120282532 @default.
• W2011960350 cites W2122739715 @default.
• W2011960350 cites W2131933574 @default.
• W2011960350 cites W2134197804 @default.
• W2011960350 cites W2140034679 @default.
• W2011960350 cites W2145225014 @default.
• W2011960350 cites W2146915121 @default.
• W2011960350 cites W2160266859 @default.
• W2011960350 cites W2170918738 @default.
• W2011960350 cites W2324617566 @default.
• W2011960350 cites W2418094248 @default.
• W2011960350 cites W2945452680 @default.
• W2011960350 doi "https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2007.070160" @default.
• W2011960350 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17970683" @default.
• W2011960350 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2011960350 type Work @default.
• W2011960350 sameAs 2011960350 @default.
• W2011960350 citedByCount "73" @default.
• W2011960350 countsByYear W20119603502012 @default.
• W2011960350 countsByYear W20119603502013 @default.
• W2011960350 countsByYear W20119603502014 @default.
• W2011960350 countsByYear W20119603502015 @default.
• W2011960350 countsByYear W20119603502016 @default.
• W2011960350 countsByYear W20119603502017 @default.
• W2011960350 countsByYear W20119603502018 @default.
• W2011960350 countsByYear W20119603502019 @default.
• W2011960350 countsByYear W20119603502020 @default.
• W2011960350 countsByYear W20119603502021 @default.
• W2011960350 countsByYear W20119603502022 @default.
• W2011960350 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2011960350 hasAuthorship W2011960350A5031351145 @default.
• W2011960350 hasAuthorship W2011960350A5032157507 @default.
• W2011960350 hasAuthorship W2011960350A5038735209 @default.
• W2011960350 hasAuthorship W2011960350A5042842452 @default.
• W2011960350 hasAuthorship W2011960350A5048159286 @default.
• W2011960350 hasAuthorship W2011960350A5049160775 @default.
• W2011960350 hasConcept C111337013 @default.
• W2011960350 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2011960350 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2011960350 hasConcept C185544564 @default.
• W2011960350 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2011960350 hasConcept C191897082 @default.
• W2011960350 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2011960350 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2011960350 hasConcept C2777686260 @default.
• W2011960350 hasConcept C2779337755 @default.
• W2011960350 hasConcept C2779416262 @default.
• W2011960350 hasConcept C2779851234 @default.
• W2011960350 hasConcept C2780385504 @default.
• W2011960350 hasConcept C511782168 @default.
• W2011960350 hasConcept C520434653 @default.
• W2011960350 hasConcept C531131001 @default.
• W2011960350 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2011960350 hasConceptScore W2011960350C111337013 @default.
• W2011960350 hasConceptScore W2011960350C120665830 @default.
• W2011960350 hasConceptScore W2011960350C121332964 @default.
• W2011960350 hasConceptScore W2011960350C185544564 @default.
• W2011960350 hasConceptScore W2011960350C185592680 @default.
• W2011960350 hasConceptScore W2011960350C191897082 @default.
• W2011960350 hasConceptScore W2011960350C192562407 @default.
• W2011960350 hasConceptScore W2011960350C199343813 @default.
• W2011960350 hasConceptScore W2011960350C2777686260 @default.
• W2011960350 hasConceptScore W2011960350C2779337755 @default.
• W2011960350 hasConceptScore W2011960350C2779416262 @default.
• W2011960350 hasConceptScore W2011960350C2779851234 @default.

• next