FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2012088576> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2012088576 endingPage "106" @default.
• W2012088576 startingPage "99" @default.
• W2012088576 abstract "Background Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) reduces the risk of stroke in selected patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid disease, but its beneficial influence on cognitive performance in the elderly remains debatable. This prospective study sought to determine early and long-term neurocognitive outcomes after CEA for severe unilateral carotid artery stenosis. Methods From July 2006 to December 2008, 75 symptomatic (group A) and 70 asymptomatic patients (group B) aged 65 years and older underwent CEA under general anesthesia. Sixty-eight age- and sex-matched individuals who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy during the same period at our institution served as a control group (group H). Patients with contralateral severe carotid stenosis or occlusion and those with dementia, depression, or a history of major stroke were excluded. Cognitive function was assessed using 2 neuropsychological tests (the Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA]) performed preoperatively (T0) and then 3 (T1) and 12 months (T2) after operation. A change of at least 2 points between the scores at T0 and T2 was arbitrarily considered as clinically significant. Results At T0, group A revealed significant cognitive impairments in both mean test scores by comparison with group H (P = .005 and P < .01, respectively), whereas there were no significant differences between groups A and B, or between groups B and H. Postoperatively, symptomatic patients had significant improvements in their mean cognitive performance scores in both tests (P < .01 and P < .01, respectively), whereas there were no changes in the asymptomatic and control patients’ scores. No significant differences emerged for the MMSE scores in the 3 groups, whereas there was a marginally significant difference in the MoCA scores between groups A and H (P = .08), but not for A versus B or B versus H when clinically significant scores were considered. Conclusion Our study showed that only elderly symptomatic patients with severe carotid lesions had a significant improvement in cognitive performance scores after CEA, although the benefit was considered clinically not significant. This suggests that CEA does not diminish neurocognitive functions, but it might provide some protection against cognitive decline in the elderly. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) reduces the risk of stroke in selected patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid disease, but its beneficial influence on cognitive performance in the elderly remains debatable. This prospective study sought to determine early and long-term neurocognitive outcomes after CEA for severe unilateral carotid artery stenosis. From July 2006 to December 2008, 75 symptomatic (group A) and 70 asymptomatic patients (group B) aged 65 years and older underwent CEA under general anesthesia. Sixty-eight age- and sex-matched individuals who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy during the same period at our institution served as a control group (group H). Patients with contralateral severe carotid stenosis or occlusion and those with dementia, depression, or a history of major stroke were excluded. Cognitive function was assessed using 2 neuropsychological tests (the Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA]) performed preoperatively (T0) and then 3 (T1) and 12 months (T2) after operation. A change of at least 2 points between the scores at T0 and T2 was arbitrarily considered as clinically significant. At T0, group A revealed significant cognitive impairments in both mean test scores by comparison with group H (P = .005 and P < .01, respectively), whereas there were no significant differences between groups A and B, or between groups B and H. Postoperatively, symptomatic patients had significant improvements in their mean cognitive performance scores in both tests (P < .01 and P < .01, respectively), whereas there were no changes in the asymptomatic and control patients’ scores. No significant differences emerged for the MMSE scores in the 3 groups, whereas there was a marginally significant difference in the MoCA scores between groups A and H (P = .08), but not for A versus B or B versus H when clinically significant scores were considered. Our study showed that only elderly symptomatic patients with severe carotid lesions had a significant improvement in cognitive performance scores after CEA, although the benefit was considered clinically not significant. This suggests that CEA does not diminish neurocognitive functions, but it might provide some protection against cognitive decline in the elderly." @default.
• W2012088576 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2012088576 creator A5016204645 @default.
• W2012088576 creator A5030696476 @default.
• W2012088576 creator A5047678826 @default.
• W2012088576 creator A5050434779 @default.
• W2012088576 creator A5065320780 @default.
• W2012088576 creator A5075880186 @default.
• W2012088576 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W2012088576 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2012088576 title "Carotid endarterectomy protects elderly patients from cognitive decline: A prospective study" @default.
• W2012088576 cites W1495823895 @default.
• W2012088576 cites W1684804860 @default.
• W2012088576 cites W1740376762 @default.
• W2012088576 cites W1847168837 @default.
• W2012088576 cites W1963928599 @default.
• W2012088576 cites W1969661146 @default.
• W2012088576 cites W1989396727 @default.
• W2012088576 cites W2000718233 @default.
• W2012088576 cites W2005800376 @default.
• W2012088576 cites W2009482473 @default.
• W2012088576 cites W2010797126 @default.
• W2012088576 cites W2016792238 @default.
• W2012088576 cites W2020203283 @default.
• W2012088576 cites W2036397809 @default.
• W2012088576 cites W2039310691 @default.
• W2012088576 cites W2040665411 @default.
• W2012088576 cites W2050912942 @default.
• W2012088576 cites W2063671303 @default.
• W2012088576 cites W2074752813 @default.
• W2012088576 cites W2090652960 @default.
• W2012088576 cites W2093594858 @default.
• W2012088576 cites W2107936205 @default.
• W2012088576 cites W2108165309 @default.
• W2012088576 cites W2108429535 @default.
• W2012088576 cites W2113345165 @default.
• W2012088576 cites W2143371987 @default.
• W2012088576 cites W2145969586 @default.
• W2012088576 cites W2154820918 @default.
• W2012088576 cites W2157402064 @default.
• W2012088576 cites W2165758561 @default.
• W2012088576 cites W2767911074 @default.
• W2012088576 cites W4252352521 @default.
• W2012088576 cites W4324264875 @default.
• W2012088576 cites W4376848366 @default.
• W2012088576 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2011.06.031" @default.
• W2012088576 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21943640" @default.
• W2012088576 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2012088576 type Work @default.
• W2012088576 sameAs 2012088576 @default.
• W2012088576 citedByCount "47" @default.
• W2012088576 countsByYear W20120885762012 @default.
• W2012088576 countsByYear W20120885762013 @default.
• W2012088576 countsByYear W20120885762014 @default.
• W2012088576 countsByYear W20120885762015 @default.
• W2012088576 countsByYear W20120885762016 @default.
• W2012088576 countsByYear W20120885762017 @default.
• W2012088576 countsByYear W20120885762018 @default.
• W2012088576 countsByYear W20120885762019 @default.
• W2012088576 countsByYear W20120885762020 @default.
• W2012088576 countsByYear W20120885762021 @default.
• W2012088576 countsByYear W20120885762022 @default.
• W2012088576 countsByYear W20120885762023 @default.
• W2012088576 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2012088576 hasAuthorship W2012088576A5016204645 @default.
• W2012088576 hasAuthorship W2012088576A5030696476 @default.
• W2012088576 hasAuthorship W2012088576A5047678826 @default.
• W2012088576 hasAuthorship W2012088576A5050434779 @default.
• W2012088576 hasAuthorship W2012088576A5065320780 @default.
• W2012088576 hasAuthorship W2012088576A5075880186 @default.
• W2012088576 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2012088576 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2012088576 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2012088576 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W2012088576 hasConcept C2776632958 @default.
• W2012088576 hasConcept C2777910003 @default.
• W2012088576 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W2012088576 hasConcept C2779483572 @default.
• W2012088576 hasConcept C2779745121 @default.
• W2012088576 hasConcept C2780007028 @default.
• W2012088576 hasConcept C2780645631 @default.
• W2012088576 hasConcept C2781068581 @default.
• W2012088576 hasConcept C2984863031 @default.
• W2012088576 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2012088576 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2012088576 hasConceptScore W2012088576C126322002 @default.
• W2012088576 hasConceptScore W2012088576C127413603 @default.
• W2012088576 hasConceptScore W2012088576C141071460 @default.
• W2012088576 hasConceptScore W2012088576C188816634 @default.
• W2012088576 hasConceptScore W2012088576C2776632958 @default.
• W2012088576 hasConceptScore W2012088576C2777910003 @default.
• W2012088576 hasConceptScore W2012088576C2779134260 @default.
• W2012088576 hasConceptScore W2012088576C2779483572 @default.
• W2012088576 hasConceptScore W2012088576C2779745121 @default.
• W2012088576 hasConceptScore W2012088576C2780007028 @default.
• W2012088576 hasConceptScore W2012088576C2780645631 @default.
• W2012088576 hasConceptScore W2012088576C2781068581 @default.
• W2012088576 hasConceptScore W2012088576C2984863031 @default.

• next