FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2012103299> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2012103299 endingPage "156" @default.
• W2012103299 startingPage "146" @default.
• W2012103299 abstract "Present cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) provide not all information necessary for decision-making. One of the factors that hamper decision-making is the difficulty in reallocating resources to new technologies. In a CEA, the incremental costs and incremental benefits of a new technology are calculated. In this article we focus on the incremental cost side. The underlying assumption in socio-economic evaluation is that resources from the substituted alternatives can be used to finance the new technology. In practice, however, not all resources are becoming available to introduce the alternative. The budgets in health care are rather fixed and shifting from one alternative to another or from one sector to another is often impossible. Even within a budget, the personnel and material resources are usually not entirely usable for the new technology, and sometimes not at all. Therefore, the present CEA outcomes might overestimate the cost-effectiveness in practice, which might influence implementation of a new technology.To optimise the usefulness of economic evaluation for health care decision-making by correcting the incremental costs of a new technology for the possible limitations in reallocating resources and adjusting budgets in health care.Case Research. Literature, data from two completed CEAs and interviews with decision makers in the hospital setting.Case 1: The combined outpatient and home-treatment of psoriasis--In a CEA it was calculated that the new technology lead to much lower cost, given the same effects. The direct costs of this technology comprise personnel, material and capacity costs. Personnel and capacity are inflexible with regard to reallocation, at least in the short term. Considering these reallocative restrictions results show that the cost-savings of the combined treatment are in the short run significantly smaller than in the long run: 694 versus 6.058, respectively. Therefore, the anticipated savings, estimated are not realistic for decision makers with a short time horizon. The short-term savings amount to only 11% of the anticipated savings in the long run. Nevertheless, the combined treatment remains a cost-effective treatment. Analysing the budgetary constraints resulted in the finding that the substitution of the in-hospital treatment by the combined treatment has taken place without negative financial consequences for the hospital. Case 2: The ground bound mobile medical team--Economic arguments to implement the ground bound mobile medical team (MMT) are undecided. With respect to the budgetary constraints we find that the budget for the trauma centre is conditional upon the deployment of the ground bound MMT. Moreover, the cost of the ground bound MMT is a relatively small part of the budget for the trauma centre and therefore no hurdle to implement.On the basis of these findings we conclude that limitations in reallocating resources and adjusting budgets in health care may hamper the usefulness of economic evaluation for decision-making. Researching the extent of these limitations provides, together with the CEA, better information on which the decision whether a new technology should be implemented and what the expected welfare gains from such an implementation might be can be made. For this a set of checklists is developed." @default.
• W2012103299 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2012103299 creator A5033676105 @default.
• W2012103299 creator A5035137508 @default.
• W2012103299 creator A5041623077 @default.
• W2012103299 creator A5063064800 @default.
• W2012103299 date "2005-10-01" @default.
• W2012103299 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2012103299 title "Cost-effectiveness analysis in relation to budgetary constraints and reallocative restrictions" @default.
• W2012103299 cites W2015110915 @default.
• W2012103299 cites W2023821056 @default.
• W2012103299 cites W2045200703 @default.
• W2012103299 cites W2060320897 @default.
• W2012103299 cites W2067433117 @default.
• W2012103299 cites W2071999091 @default.
• W2012103299 cites W2162787972 @default.
• W2012103299 cites W2568163616 @default.
• W2012103299 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.12.015" @default.
• W2012103299 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16153475" @default.
• W2012103299 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2012103299 type Work @default.
• W2012103299 sameAs 2012103299 @default.
• W2012103299 citedByCount "32" @default.
• W2012103299 countsByYear W20121032992012 @default.
• W2012103299 countsByYear W20121032992013 @default.
• W2012103299 countsByYear W20121032992014 @default.
• W2012103299 countsByYear W20121032992015 @default.
• W2012103299 countsByYear W20121032992017 @default.
• W2012103299 countsByYear W20121032992019 @default.
• W2012103299 countsByYear W20121032992020 @default.
• W2012103299 countsByYear W20121032992021 @default.
• W2012103299 countsByYear W20121032992022 @default.
• W2012103299 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2012103299 hasAuthorship W2012103299A5033676105 @default.
• W2012103299 hasAuthorship W2012103299A5035137508 @default.
• W2012103299 hasAuthorship W2012103299A5041623077 @default.
• W2012103299 hasAuthorship W2012103299A5063064800 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConcept C127454912 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConcept C134560507 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConcept C175444787 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConcept C21333345 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConcept C21547014 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConcept C2776125615 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConcept C2780615836 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConcept C42475967 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConcept C539667460 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConceptScore W2012103299C112930515 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConceptScore W2012103299C127413603 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConceptScore W2012103299C127454912 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConceptScore W2012103299C134560507 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConceptScore W2012103299C136764020 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConceptScore W2012103299C144133560 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConceptScore W2012103299C160735492 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConceptScore W2012103299C162324750 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConceptScore W2012103299C175444787 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConceptScore W2012103299C18903297 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConceptScore W2012103299C21333345 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConceptScore W2012103299C21547014 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConceptScore W2012103299C2776125615 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConceptScore W2012103299C2780615836 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConceptScore W2012103299C41008148 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConceptScore W2012103299C42475967 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConceptScore W2012103299C50522688 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConceptScore W2012103299C539667460 @default.
• W2012103299 hasConceptScore W2012103299C86803240 @default.
• W2012103299 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2012103299 hasLocation W20121032991 @default.
• W2012103299 hasLocation W20121032992 @default.
• W2012103299 hasOpenAccess W2012103299 @default.
• W2012103299 hasPrimaryLocation W20121032991 @default.
• W2012103299 hasRelatedWork W157937689 @default.
• W2012103299 hasRelatedWork W1984735973 @default.
• W2012103299 hasRelatedWork W2038945177 @default.
• W2012103299 hasRelatedWork W2069974960 @default.
• W2012103299 hasRelatedWork W2277353457 @default.
• W2012103299 hasRelatedWork W2519014288 @default.
• W2012103299 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2012103299 hasRelatedWork W2974297147 @default.
• W2012103299 hasRelatedWork W3121638891 @default.
• W2012103299 hasRelatedWork W4285420766 @default.
• W2012103299 hasVolume "74" @default.
• W2012103299 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2012103299 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2012103299 magId "2012103299" @default.
• W2012103299 workType "article" @default.