FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2012152783> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2012152783 endingPage "845" @default.
• W2012152783 startingPage "837" @default.
• W2012152783 abstract "Summary 1. Smooth bark on trees and shrubs was historically hypothesized to be an anatomical defence against epiphytic vegetation and phytophagous insects. This hypothesis has fallen from favour, yet no clear tests of bark texture as a defence against insects have been published. 2. We tested the smooth bark defence hypothesis using bark beetles specialized in attacking pine trees as model insects, and Pinus flexilis (limber pine) – a widespread tree that can have both smooth and rough bark surfaces on the same stem – as the model tree. We investigated the effects of bark texture on the locations of bark beetle attacks on trees with a combination of field surveys and experiments in the Colorado Rocky Mountains, USA. 3. Bark beetle attacks were overwhelmingly located on rough bark surfaces and virtually absent from smooth bark. Increasing proportional coverage by smooth bark was negatively related to bark beetle attacks per square metre of bark surface. Experimental tests of bark beetles’ ability to grip smooth versus rough bark revealed that bark beetles have difficulty gripping and quickly fell from smooth bark but not from rough bark. 4. Smooth bark was negatively related to increasing tree size, but our models indicated that even partial coverage by smooth bark on a tree’s trunk can significantly reduce total bark beetle attacks – this reduction likely improves tree fitness as bark beetles must aggregate to overcome tree defences. 5. Synthesis. Our results indicate that smooth bark on trees can act as an anatomical defence against insects by reducing their ability to grip a tree’s surface – even for insects specialized in attacking tree stems. Similar to other forms of anti-insect defence (i.e. secondary chemistry, leaf toughness), smooth bark appears to be influenced by plant ontogeny whereby younger trees have greater defences than older trees. Understanding the adaptive significance of bark texture will require continued field and genetic study. Nevertheless, our results revealed that smooth bark texture increases tree resistance to phytophagous insects calling for the resurrection and vetting of the smooth bark defence hypothesis." @default.
• W2012152783 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2012152783 creator A5040459247 @default.
• W2012152783 creator A5053857464 @default.
• W2012152783 date "2014-02-03" @default.
• W2012152783 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2012152783 title "Smooth bark surfaces can defend trees against insect attack: resurrecting a ‘slippery’ hypothesis" @default.
• W2012152783 cites W1505650241 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W1518546884 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W1763779503 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W1930701598 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W1968712941 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W1970388631 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W1985698932 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W1991931757 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W1997042833 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2002794919 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2011735098 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2013805643 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2015678546 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2017138523 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2029796932 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2035478239 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2049049960 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2055451617 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2057715439 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2060751119 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2062374893 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2064669609 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2069939819 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2072712813 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2076037383 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2082829060 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2085130525 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2094506967 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2104608037 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2110004090 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2112603340 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2117634757 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2117734540 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2120325234 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2129817646 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2133738475 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2137123997 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2138820226 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2142638044 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2160912831 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2169725077 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2170735622 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2172012101 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2312243840 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2317621900 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W2795558443 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W4241338553 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W4250477080 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W4250649742 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W4253829162 @default.
• W2012152783 cites W4292997028 @default.
• W2012152783 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12228" @default.
• W2012152783 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2012152783 type Work @default.
• W2012152783 sameAs 2012152783 @default.
• W2012152783 citedByCount "57" @default.
• W2012152783 countsByYear W20121527832014 @default.
• W2012152783 countsByYear W20121527832015 @default.
• W2012152783 countsByYear W20121527832016 @default.
• W2012152783 countsByYear W20121527832017 @default.
• W2012152783 countsByYear W20121527832018 @default.
• W2012152783 countsByYear W20121527832019 @default.
• W2012152783 countsByYear W20121527832020 @default.
• W2012152783 countsByYear W20121527832021 @default.
• W2012152783 countsByYear W20121527832022 @default.
• W2012152783 countsByYear W20121527832023 @default.
• W2012152783 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2012152783 hasAuthorship W2012152783A5040459247 @default.
• W2012152783 hasAuthorship W2012152783A5053857464 @default.
• W2012152783 hasConcept C133446333 @default.
• W2012152783 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2012152783 hasConcept C2777612826 @default.
• W2012152783 hasConcept C2779751432 @default.
• W2012152783 hasConcept C59822182 @default.
• W2012152783 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2012152783 hasConceptScore W2012152783C133446333 @default.
• W2012152783 hasConceptScore W2012152783C18903297 @default.
• W2012152783 hasConceptScore W2012152783C2777612826 @default.
• W2012152783 hasConceptScore W2012152783C2779751432 @default.
• W2012152783 hasConceptScore W2012152783C59822182 @default.
• W2012152783 hasConceptScore W2012152783C86803240 @default.
• W2012152783 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2012152783 hasLocation W20121527831 @default.
• W2012152783 hasOpenAccess W2012152783 @default.
• W2012152783 hasPrimaryLocation W20121527831 @default.
• W2012152783 hasRelatedWork W1975948217 @default.
• W2012152783 hasRelatedWork W1990359202 @default.
• W2012152783 hasRelatedWork W1994132873 @default.
• W2012152783 hasRelatedWork W1999949720 @default.
• W2012152783 hasRelatedWork W2027322580 @default.
• W2012152783 hasRelatedWork W2032119983 @default.

• next