FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2012153479> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2012153479 endingPage "1136" @default.
• W2012153479 startingPage "1128" @default.
• W2012153479 abstract "Objective To assess in randomized prospective format sensitivity, laparotomy rate, and cost-effectiveness of using diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) in a complementary role with computed tomography (CT) in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma. Methods Blunt trauma patients greater than 18 years of age were eligible for entry in the study. The study period was from February 1999 to July 2000 at an urban Level I trauma center. All patients were hemodynamically stable upon study entry and had abdominal tenderness with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores > 13 or GCS < 14. Patients were randomized to a DPL arm (DPL-CT) versus a CT arm. If randomized to the CT arm, patients underwent abdominal/pelvis CT. If CT was positive for solid organ injury, patients were observed. If free fluid was identified on CT without solid organ injury, patients were explored. If randomized to DPL-CT, patients underwent closed infraumbilical DPL, except pelvic fractures that were done with the open supraumbilical technique. If the DPL result was > 20,000 RBCs/mm3, patients underwent abdominal/pelvis CT. If the CT following DPL was consistent with solid organ injury, patients were observed. If the CT following DPL identified free fluid without solid organ injury and DPL was > 100,000 RBCs/mm3, patients were explored. Results Two hundred fifty-two patients were entered; 127 patients were randomized to DPL-CT and 125 to CT. Of the 125 patients randomized to CT, 102 (82%) CT scans were negative, 19 (15%) were positive for solid organ injury, and 3 (2%) had free fluid. Three (2%) of the initial negative CT scan patients underwent delayed laparotomy for missed injuries. Of the 127 patients randomized to DPL-CT, 26 (20%) required CT scan, of which 13 (10%) were positive for solid organ injury and 13 (10%) for free fluid. Positive DPL results that were indications for CT ranged from 21,000 to 1 million RBCs/mm3. Eight of the 13 DPL-CT patients with free fluid on CT had DPL results less than 100,000 RBCs/mm3 and did not require laparotomy. There were no known missed injuries in the DPL-CT arm. Seven (6%) laparotomies were performed in the DPL-CT arm and 10 (8%) in the CT arm. The average cost to the patient for abdominal evaluation in the CT arm was $1611 and $650 in the DPL-CT arm. Conclusion Screening DPL with complementary CT has a low nontherapeutic laparotomy rate and is a sensitive and cost-effective method for the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma." @default.
• W2012153479 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2012153479 creator A5026307015 @default.
• W2012153479 creator A5045458698 @default.
• W2012153479 creator A5082364214 @default.
• W2012153479 date "2001-12-01" @default.
• W2012153479 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2012153479 title "Complementary Roles of Diagnostic Peritoneal Lavage and Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Blunt Abdominal Trauma" @default.
• W2012153479 cites W194192767 @default.
• W2012153479 cites W1967699774 @default.
• W2012153479 cites W1991231746 @default.
• W2012153479 cites W1992313646 @default.
• W2012153479 cites W1995087667 @default.
• W2012153479 cites W2003215910 @default.
• W2012153479 cites W2006800287 @default.
• W2012153479 cites W2009802732 @default.
• W2012153479 cites W2010030859 @default.
• W2012153479 cites W2017584596 @default.
• W2012153479 cites W2029187303 @default.
• W2012153479 cites W2030870643 @default.
• W2012153479 cites W2041249589 @default.
• W2012153479 cites W2042346568 @default.
• W2012153479 cites W2055401302 @default.
• W2012153479 cites W2062034972 @default.
• W2012153479 cites W2076718243 @default.
• W2012153479 cites W2087056280 @default.
• W2012153479 cites W2090493943 @default.
• W2012153479 cites W2090540067 @default.
• W2012153479 cites W2092529164 @default.
• W2012153479 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-200112000-00019" @default.
• W2012153479 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11740265" @default.
• W2012153479 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
• W2012153479 type Work @default.
• W2012153479 sameAs 2012153479 @default.
• W2012153479 citedByCount "39" @default.
• W2012153479 countsByYear W20121534792012 @default.
• W2012153479 countsByYear W20121534792014 @default.
• W2012153479 countsByYear W20121534792015 @default.
• W2012153479 countsByYear W20121534792016 @default.
• W2012153479 countsByYear W20121534792018 @default.
• W2012153479 countsByYear W20121534792019 @default.
• W2012153479 countsByYear W20121534792021 @default.
• W2012153479 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2012153479 hasAuthorship W2012153479A5026307015 @default.
• W2012153479 hasAuthorship W2012153479A5045458698 @default.
• W2012153479 hasAuthorship W2012153479A5082364214 @default.
• W2012153479 hasConcept C105698618 @default.
• W2012153479 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2012153479 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2012153479 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2012153479 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2012153479 hasConcept C17624336 @default.
• W2012153479 hasConcept C2777379000 @default.
• W2012153479 hasConcept C2777521253 @default.
• W2012153479 hasConcept C2778357063 @default.
• W2012153479 hasConcept C2779983558 @default.
• W2012153479 hasConcept C2780110798 @default.
• W2012153479 hasConcept C2780778865 @default.
• W2012153479 hasConcept C2781339890 @default.
• W2012153479 hasConcept C544519230 @default.
• W2012153479 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2012153479 hasConceptScore W2012153479C105698618 @default.
• W2012153479 hasConceptScore W2012153479C126838900 @default.
• W2012153479 hasConceptScore W2012153479C141071460 @default.
• W2012153479 hasConceptScore W2012153479C167135981 @default.
• W2012153479 hasConceptScore W2012153479C168563851 @default.
• W2012153479 hasConceptScore W2012153479C17624336 @default.
• W2012153479 hasConceptScore W2012153479C2777379000 @default.
• W2012153479 hasConceptScore W2012153479C2777521253 @default.
• W2012153479 hasConceptScore W2012153479C2778357063 @default.
• W2012153479 hasConceptScore W2012153479C2779983558 @default.
• W2012153479 hasConceptScore W2012153479C2780110798 @default.
• W2012153479 hasConceptScore W2012153479C2780778865 @default.
• W2012153479 hasConceptScore W2012153479C2781339890 @default.
• W2012153479 hasConceptScore W2012153479C544519230 @default.
• W2012153479 hasConceptScore W2012153479C71924100 @default.
• W2012153479 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2012153479 hasLocation W20121534791 @default.
• W2012153479 hasLocation W20121534792 @default.
• W2012153479 hasOpenAccess W2012153479 @default.
• W2012153479 hasPrimaryLocation W20121534791 @default.
• W2012153479 hasRelatedWork W1681006999 @default.
• W2012153479 hasRelatedWork W1968306044 @default.
• W2012153479 hasRelatedWork W1977504369 @default.
• W2012153479 hasRelatedWork W2009802732 @default.
• W2012153479 hasRelatedWork W2047500067 @default.
• W2012153479 hasRelatedWork W2131577122 @default.
• W2012153479 hasRelatedWork W2640055445 @default.
• W2012153479 hasRelatedWork W3118775966 @default.
• W2012153479 hasRelatedWork W35784254 @default.
• W2012153479 hasRelatedWork W4241754243 @default.
• W2012153479 hasVolume "51" @default.
• W2012153479 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2012153479 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2012153479 magId "2012153479" @default.
• W2012153479 workType "article" @default.