FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2012160929> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2012160929 endingPage "116" @default.
• W2012160929 startingPage "114" @default.
• W2012160929 abstract "In the first issue of Volume 63, we focused our editorial on the need to improve research in teacher education by increasing the rigor and relevance of studies in the field. We referred to individual studies as in a structure that would serve as a knowledge base for researchers, practitioners, and policy makers (Knight, Lloyd, Arbaugh, Edmondson, Nolan, & Whitney, 2012). As researchers, we need to attend to both the quality of individual bricks and the positioning of those bricks within the framework. In other words, by situating our findings within the theoretical frameworks and prior research that undergird the knowledge base, we can advance the field. Research submitted to Journal of Teacher Education (JTE) is steadily improving. Although much of our own evidence as editors of JTE is anecdotal, coming from the hundreds of articles we encounter each year, evidence for improvement is emerging from other sources as well. Our acceptance rate has steadily increased while we have maintained the same high standards for publication. Although not the sole indicator of quality, the change in the impact of the journal may also signal a perceived increase in quality by readers of the journal. In a previous editorial (JTE 63:1), we cited our rank of 18 out of 177 education and education research journals and an impact factor of 1.891 as evidence of our standing in the field. Since that time, thanks to the efforts of previous editors and what we see as the improvement of research in teacher education leading to more citations, JTE has moved to number 10 of 203 journals and has increased the impact factor to 2.292 (Thompson Reuters, 2012). Nevertheless, we still have more to do. As editors, we spend a great deal of time articulating what makes some manuscripts publishable and others not. Manuscripts are often subjected to editorial team review prior to being sent out for peer scrutiny and always before their final acceptance. As we discuss the characteristics of various manuscripts, the complexity of defining research quality in a field with such diverse methods and topics becomes apparent. Others have explored the topic for education research in general (see, for example, National Research Council, 2002). However, as we continue this discussion, we find we are slowly acquiring a set of criteria which can be applied to diverse studies specifically in teacher education. Although these criteria are still emerging, we would like to expand the discussion to the JTE readership by sharing our thoughts on some of the criteria we have formulated to date. Criteria for Quality In judging manuscripts, we consider a number of questions related to criteria for quality. Some questions are dictated by criteria for appropriateness for JTE, but others revolve around more generic issues of quality. As editors of a journal with such a diverse readership, we find that to make the range of studies and topics accessible to proponents of different philosophies, research paradigms, and interests, authors need to be very explicit in their rationale and report of the research and how they have incorporated the criteria for quality in their studies. The following questions may help guide authors in this process. Appropriateness for JTE The first question we ask of any manuscript that comes across our desk is whether the study actually focuses on teacher education, and if so, would it be of interest to readers of the journal. Is the manuscript appropriate for JTE? Two types of manuscripts typically receive a negative response to this question. Studies that focus on teaching or teachers or students in elementary and secondary schools, without making an explicit connection to teacher education, constitute the first category. Merely mentioning the applicability of the findings for teacher education in the implications is not enough. The connection to teacher education should appear in the theoretical framework and the rationale for the study, as well as in the discussion and implications. …" @default.
• W2012160929 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2012160929 creator A5001069911 @default.
• W2012160929 creator A5019519468 @default.
• W2012160929 creator A5035125823 @default.
• W2012160929 creator A5047315930 @default.
• W2012160929 creator A5083122656 @default.
• W2012160929 creator A5089474976 @default.
• W2012160929 date "2013-02-14" @default.
• W2012160929 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
• W2012160929 title "Quality Teacher Education Research" @default.
• W2012160929 cites W2013568657 @default.
• W2012160929 cites W2082106833 @default.
• W2012160929 cites W2154566503 @default.
• W2012160929 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112469941" @default.
• W2012160929 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2012160929 type Work @default.
• W2012160929 sameAs 2012160929 @default.
• W2012160929 citedByCount "19" @default.
• W2012160929 countsByYear W20121609292013 @default.
• W2012160929 countsByYear W20121609292014 @default.
• W2012160929 countsByYear W20121609292015 @default.
• W2012160929 countsByYear W20121609292018 @default.
• W2012160929 countsByYear W20121609292019 @default.
• W2012160929 countsByYear W20121609292020 @default.
• W2012160929 countsByYear W20121609292021 @default.
• W2012160929 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2012160929 hasAuthorship W2012160929A5001069911 @default.
• W2012160929 hasAuthorship W2012160929A5019519468 @default.
• W2012160929 hasAuthorship W2012160929A5035125823 @default.
• W2012160929 hasAuthorship W2012160929A5047315930 @default.
• W2012160929 hasAuthorship W2012160929A5083122656 @default.
• W2012160929 hasAuthorship W2012160929A5089474976 @default.
• W2012160929 hasBestOaLocation W20121609291 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConcept C120912362 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConcept C176217482 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConcept C2776905826 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConcept C2780805685 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConcept C36727532 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConceptScore W2012160929C111472728 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConceptScore W2012160929C120912362 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConceptScore W2012160929C138885662 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConceptScore W2012160929C144024400 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConceptScore W2012160929C144133560 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConceptScore W2012160929C145420912 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConceptScore W2012160929C15744967 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConceptScore W2012160929C162853370 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConceptScore W2012160929C176217482 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConceptScore W2012160929C17744445 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConceptScore W2012160929C19417346 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConceptScore W2012160929C199539241 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConceptScore W2012160929C2776905826 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConceptScore W2012160929C2779530757 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConceptScore W2012160929C2780805685 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConceptScore W2012160929C36727532 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConceptScore W2012160929C509550671 @default.
• W2012160929 hasConceptScore W2012160929C71924100 @default.
• W2012160929 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2012160929 hasLocation W20121609291 @default.
• W2012160929 hasOpenAccess W2012160929 @default.
• W2012160929 hasPrimaryLocation W20121609291 @default.
• W2012160929 hasRelatedWork W1877765863 @default.
• W2012160929 hasRelatedWork W1973444203 @default.
• W2012160929 hasRelatedWork W2360625217 @default.
• W2012160929 hasRelatedWork W2376936665 @default.
• W2012160929 hasRelatedWork W2379286615 @default.
• W2012160929 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2012160929 hasRelatedWork W3152611417 @default.
• W2012160929 hasRelatedWork W4286614742 @default.
• W2012160929 hasRelatedWork W54633764 @default.
• W2012160929 hasRelatedWork W2187161397 @default.
• W2012160929 hasVolume "64" @default.
• W2012160929 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2012160929 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2012160929 magId "2012160929" @default.
• W2012160929 workType "article" @default.