FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2012175592> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2012175592 endingPage "200" @default.
• W2012175592 startingPage "181" @default.
• W2012175592 abstract "In an era when new technology and media increasingly infiltrate all facets of our lives, and progress on gender, racial, and other forms of equity appears excruciatingly slow, now seems a critical time to examine new and their potential value for feminist activism. Since its public emergence in the late 1980s, the internet has been simultaneously criticized as oppressive and heralded as empowering for different communities. In this review, we will examine some of the emerging forms that feminist activist art is taking in relation to the internet and consider how technology has contributed to the goals of feminist artists and activists. It is important to contextualize this review by considering the conflicted term (Braidotti 1996; Gajjala 1999; Sollfrank 2002). Since the mid-1990s, the term cyberfeminism has been used to investigate the ways in which technology, especially new media and internet technology, and gender interact. Cyberfeminists investigate the celebratory yet contradictory nature of new and work to determine methods of appropriation, intervention, or parallel practice to insert women's issues into the dominant technology discourse. While many women working with technology have regarded this term suspiciously, feminist activist artist Faith Wilding pointed to the possibilities and optimism inherent within it. In her influential article, Where is Feminism in Cyberfeminism? Wilding asserts that cyberfeminists have the chance to create new formations of feminist theory and practice which address the complex new social conditions created by global technologies (1 998). Prominent feminist theorist Rosi Braidotti noted that a central aim of cyberfeminism was the breakdown and disintegration of contemporary gender boundaries (1996). Cyberfeminism as a liberatory ideal has not yet achieved its potential, in part because of larger societal pressures surrounding the information technology fields. If a fundamental aim of cyberfeminism is to change and reorganize social and political realities by engaging technology to address gender issues, little progress has been achieved for women. In the United States, for instance, the dearth of women, especially women of color, in computer science and technology studies and professions has been described by researchers as a social justice issue (Wardle, Martin, and Clarke 2004). Female enrollment in information technology academic areas continues to decline, and the current gender imbalance in computing and new technology areas such as game and software development, hinders progress for women in social equity, equal access, and empowerment" @default.
• W2012175592 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2012175592 creator A5035545722 @default.
• W2012175592 creator A5072255383 @default.
• W2012175592 date "2007-04-01" @default.
• W2012175592 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2012175592 title "Rethinking the F Word: A Review of Activist Art on the Internet" @default.
• W2012175592 cites W1976506434 @default.
• W2012175592 cites W2003713716 @default.
• W2012175592 cites W2005443350 @default.
• W2012175592 cites W2010464088 @default.
• W2012175592 cites W2024676223 @default.
• W2012175592 cites W2087533684 @default.
• W2012175592 doi "https://doi.org/10.2979/nws.2007.19.1.181" @default.
• W2012175592 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2012175592 type Work @default.
• W2012175592 sameAs 2012175592 @default.
• W2012175592 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2012175592 countsByYear W20121755922014 @default.
• W2012175592 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2012175592 hasAuthorship W2012175592A5035545722 @default.
• W2012175592 hasAuthorship W2012175592A5072255383 @default.
• W2012175592 hasConcept C108827166 @default.
• W2012175592 hasConcept C110875604 @default.
• W2012175592 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W2012175592 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2012175592 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2012175592 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2012175592 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2012175592 hasConcept C29595303 @default.
• W2012175592 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2012175592 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2012175592 hasConcept C90805587 @default.
• W2012175592 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2012175592 hasConceptScore W2012175592C108827166 @default.
• W2012175592 hasConceptScore W2012175592C110875604 @default.
• W2012175592 hasConceptScore W2012175592C136764020 @default.
• W2012175592 hasConceptScore W2012175592C138885662 @default.
• W2012175592 hasConceptScore W2012175592C142362112 @default.
• W2012175592 hasConceptScore W2012175592C144024400 @default.
• W2012175592 hasConceptScore W2012175592C17744445 @default.
• W2012175592 hasConceptScore W2012175592C29595303 @default.
• W2012175592 hasConceptScore W2012175592C41008148 @default.
• W2012175592 hasConceptScore W2012175592C41895202 @default.
• W2012175592 hasConceptScore W2012175592C90805587 @default.
• W2012175592 hasConceptScore W2012175592C95457728 @default.
• W2012175592 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2012175592 hasLocation W20121755921 @default.
• W2012175592 hasOpenAccess W2012175592 @default.
• W2012175592 hasPrimaryLocation W20121755921 @default.
• W2012175592 hasRelatedWork W115080276 @default.
• W2012175592 hasRelatedWork W1585695907 @default.
• W2012175592 hasRelatedWork W2258978502 @default.
• W2012175592 hasRelatedWork W2362523880 @default.
• W2012175592 hasRelatedWork W2417281987 @default.
• W2012175592 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2012175592 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2012175592 hasRelatedWork W3001520880 @default.
• W2012175592 hasRelatedWork W3200854560 @default.
• W2012175592 hasRelatedWork W4212965969 @default.
• W2012175592 hasVolume "19" @default.
• W2012175592 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2012175592 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2012175592 magId "2012175592" @default.
• W2012175592 workType "article" @default.