FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2012191883> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2012191883 abstract "Images and videos are subject to a wide variety of distortions during acquisition, digitizing, processing, restoration, compression, storage, transmission and reproduction, any of which may result in degradation in visual quality. That is why image quality assessment plays a major role in many image processing applications. Image and video quality metrics can be classified by using a number of criteria such as the type of the application domain, the predicted distortion (noise, blur, etc.) and the type of information needed to assess the quality (original image, distorted image, etc.). In the literature, the most reliable way of assessing the quality of an image or of a video is subjective evaluation [1], because human beings are the ultimate receivers in most applications. The subjective quality metric, obtained from a number of human observers, has been regarded for many years as the most reliable form of quality measurement. However, this approach is too cumbersome, slow and expensive for most applications [2]. So, in recent years a great effort has been made towards the development of quantitative measures. The objective quality evaluation is automated, done in real time and needs no user interaction. But ideally, such a quality assessment system would perceive and measure image or video impairments just like a human being [3]. The quality assessment is so important and is still an active and evolving research topic because it is a central issue in the design, implementation, and performance testing of all systems [4, 5]. Usually, the relevant literature and the related work present only a state of the art of metrics that are limited to a specific application domain. The major goal of this paper is to present a wider state of the art of the most used metrics in several application domains such as compression [6], restoration [7], etc. In this paper, we review the basic concepts and methods in subjective and objective image/video quality assessment research and we discuss their performances and drawbacks in each application domain. We show that if in some domains a lot of work has been done and several metrics were developed, on the other hand, in some other domains a lot of work has to be done and specific metrics need to be developed." @default.
• W2012191883 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2012191883 creator A5034348902 @default.
• W2012191883 creator A5044818908 @default.
• W2012191883 creator A5049261189 @default.
• W2012191883 creator A5063197263 @default.
• W2012191883 date "2008-01-27" @default.
• W2012191883 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2012191883 title "Are existing procedures enough? Image and video quality assessment: review of subjective and objective metrics" @default.
• W2012191883 cites W1488264458 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W1526068416 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W1527289589 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W1546055895 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W1583822213 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W1597053676 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W1722323699 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W1913675087 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W1962974002 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W1994513297 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W2017175959 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W2017875004 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W2057239436 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W2059289739 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W2085704189 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W2100100229 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W2102649253 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W2106775624 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W2107476778 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W2109742538 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W2110132911 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W2113045514 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W2114338738 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W2116044718 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W2117690115 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W2125382552 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W2125654704 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W2128861077 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W2129505209 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W2133251102 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W2133665775 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W2153582625 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W2158564760 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W2159269332 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W2159676406 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W2162641729 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W2168265015 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W2168756588 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W2404125386 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W2500675572 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W42232744 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W604414359 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W2015716634 @default.
• W2012191883 cites W3196447778 @default.
• W2012191883 doi "https://doi.org/10.1117/12.760803" @default.
• W2012191883 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2012191883 type Work @default.
• W2012191883 sameAs 2012191883 @default.
• W2012191883 citedByCount "15" @default.
• W2012191883 countsByYear W20121918832012 @default.
• W2012191883 countsByYear W20121918832018 @default.
• W2012191883 countsByYear W20121918832020 @default.
• W2012191883 countsByYear W20121918832021 @default.
• W2012191883 countsByYear W20121918832023 @default.
• W2012191883 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W2012191883 hasAuthorship W2012191883A5034348902 @default.
• W2012191883 hasAuthorship W2012191883A5044818908 @default.
• W2012191883 hasAuthorship W2012191883A5049261189 @default.
• W2012191883 hasAuthorship W2012191883A5063197263 @default.
• W2012191883 hasConcept C103910844 @default.
• W2012191883 hasConcept C106430172 @default.
• W2012191883 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2012191883 hasConcept C114227958 @default.
• W2012191883 hasConcept C115961682 @default.
• W2012191883 hasConcept C126780896 @default.
• W2012191883 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2012191883 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2012191883 hasConcept C160086991 @default.
• W2012191883 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2012191883 hasConcept C176217482 @default.
• W2012191883 hasConcept C194257627 @default.
• W2012191883 hasConcept C21547014 @default.
• W2012191883 hasConcept C2776257435 @default.
• W2012191883 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W2012191883 hasConcept C31258907 @default.
• W2012191883 hasConcept C31972630 @default.
• W2012191883 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2012191883 hasConcept C55020928 @default.
• W2012191883 hasConcept C9417928 @default.
• W2012191883 hasConcept C99498987 @default.
• W2012191883 hasConceptScore W2012191883C103910844 @default.
• W2012191883 hasConceptScore W2012191883C106430172 @default.
• W2012191883 hasConceptScore W2012191883C111472728 @default.
• W2012191883 hasConceptScore W2012191883C114227958 @default.
• W2012191883 hasConceptScore W2012191883C115961682 @default.
• W2012191883 hasConceptScore W2012191883C126780896 @default.
• W2012191883 hasConceptScore W2012191883C138885662 @default.
• W2012191883 hasConceptScore W2012191883C154945302 @default.
• W2012191883 hasConceptScore W2012191883C160086991 @default.
• W2012191883 hasConceptScore W2012191883C162324750 @default.
• W2012191883 hasConceptScore W2012191883C176217482 @default.

• next