FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2012238618> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2012238618 endingPage "50" @default.
• W2012238618 startingPage "35" @default.
• W2012238618 abstract "Michael V. Ellis University at Albany, State University of New York Nicholas Ladany Temple University Maxine Krengel Boston Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine Deborah Schult University at Albany, State University of New York The empirical studies in clinical supervision published from 1981 through 1993 were investigated to assess scientific rigor and to test whether the quality of methodology had improved since the review by R. K. Russell, A. M. Crimmings, and R. W. Lent (1984). The 144 studies were evaluated according to 49 threats to validity (T. D. Cook & D. T. Campbell, 1979; R. K. Russell et al., 1984; B. E. Wampold, B. Davis, & R. H. Good III, 1990) and 8 statistical variables (e.g., effect size, statistical power, and Type I and Type II error rates). The data revealed a shift to realistic field studies, unchecked Type I and Type II error rates, medium effect sizes, and inattention to hypothesis validity. Recommendations for designing and conducting a feasible and well-designed supervision study are offered. It can be argued that a primary goal of research in clinical supervision is to test and improve theory and to guide the practice of supervision (Ellis, 1991b). A thorough under- standing of the strengths and weaknesses of supervision research would ostensibly expand supervision theory and provide practitioners with information on how to train ef- fective counselors who, in turn, will provide more effective therapy. Although there have been numerous calls for in- creasing the scientific rigor of research on counselor super- vision and training (e.g., Ellis, 1991b; Hansen & Warner, Michael V. Ellis and Deborah Schult, Department of Counseling Psychology, University at Albany, State University of New York; Nicholas Ladany, Department of Counseling Psychology, Temple University; Maxine Krengel, Psychology Section (1168), Boston Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Department of Psychology, Boston University School of Medicine. Earlier versions of this article were presented at the 96th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Atlanta, Georgia, August 1988, and at the meeting of the North Atlantic Regional Association of Counselor Education and Supervision, Albany, New York, October 1991. Maxine Krengel completed some of this research while a doc- toral student in the Department of Counseling Psychology, Uni- versity at Albany, State University of New York. We are grateful to Micki Friedlander, Richard Haase, and Erica Robbins Ellis for their insightful comments on earlier versions of this article. We express our appreciation to Eric Adams, Mafoozal Ali, Elizabeth Bhargava, Virginia Flander, David Hahn, Gohpa Khan, Michelle Mautner, Deborah Melincoff, Michael Remshard, Greg Savage, Heidi Weiss, Donna Wilson, and Bradley Wolgast for their data coding and entry assistance. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Michael V. Ellis, Department of Counseling Psychology, Educa- tion 220, University at Albany, State University of New York, 1400 Washington Avenue, Albany, New York 12222. Electronic mail may be sent via Internet to me464@cnsibm.albany.edu. 35 1971; Holloway & Hosford, 1983; Russell, Crimmings, & Lent, 1984), a comprehensive and in-depth investigation of the actual state of scientific rigor has yet to be conducted. If supervision research is going to meet the goal of informing theory and practice, then a thorough assessment of its meth- odological limitations and implications is warranted. At least 32 reviews of empirically based articles pertain- ing to clinical supervision and counselor training have ap- peared in the literature. Although these reviews have made substantial contributions to the field, many did not evaluate systematically the methodological or the scientific rigor of the examined studies (e.g., Harkness & Poertner, 1989; Holloway, 1984, 1992; Holloway & Neufeldt, 1995; Kaplan, 1983; Lambert & Arnold, 1987; Leddick & Ber- nard, 1980; Liddle & Halpin, 1978; Matarazzo, 1971, 1978; Matarazzo & Garner, 1992; Matarazzo & Patterson, 1986; Russell & Petrie, 1994; Stoltenberg, McNeill, & Crethar, 1994; Yutrzenka, 1995) or did so in a cursory fashion (i.e., Baker & Daniels, 1989; Baker, Daniels, & Greeley, 1990; Ford, 1979; Hansen, Pound, & Petro, 1976; Robins, & Grimes, 1982; Hansen & Warner, 1971; Holloway & Johnston, 1985; Holloway & Wampold, 1986; Kurtz, Mar- shall, & Banspach, 1985; Loganbill, Hardy, & Delworth, 1982; Stein & Lambert, 1995; Worthington, 1987). Only four reviewers presented details of the methodological flaws encountered in the studies reviewed (Alberts & Edelstein, 1990; Avis & Sprenkle, 1990; Holloway, 1987; Russell et al., 1984). The result of not systematically evaluating the methodological issues may have erroneously led to (a) equating (or even outweighing) the findings of excellent research with poor research (Hogarty, 1989; Kline, 1983), (b) exacerbating the theoretical ambiguity in the field (Meehl, 1990), and (c) drawing inaccurate inferences and conclusions (Cooper, 1989; Ellis, 1991a). The most recent review of research in individual clinical supervision that" @default.
• W2012238618 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2012238618 creator A5013795876 @default.
• W2012238618 creator A5019094128 @default.
• W2012238618 creator A5056513663 @default.
• W2012238618 creator A5074851444 @default.
• W2012238618 date "1996-01-01" @default.
• W2012238618 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2012238618 title "Clinical supervision research from 1981 to 1993: A methodological critique." @default.
• W2012238618 cites W1488653990 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W1491087240 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W1503678631 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W1508586217 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W1509366713 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W1544597039 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W1557591406 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W1655148052 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W1678075479 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W1730015549 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W1787378816 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W1936754488 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W1965596056 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W1969621729 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W1971323826 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W1972132107 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W1972812656 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W1973725400 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W1974219316 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W1977225215 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W1980683485 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W1981535767 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W1985453879 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W1985898303 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W1986169949 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W1986747051 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W1987838173 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W1989735017 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W1993031176 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W1994038042 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W1995584660 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W1997500975 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W1998133439 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W1999735907 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2001518090 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2002167238 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2008697218 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2010229978 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2017851494 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2024996526 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2025422548 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2025907471 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2026202540 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2026229749 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2040491004 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2044939445 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2045326801 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2047843386 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2048721843 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2051761572 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2053441981 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2053630178 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2054363815 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2054490594 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2054596279 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2055786008 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2060240693 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2062197978 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2062974058 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2063698965 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2064621910 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2066331796 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2068731744 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2073246695 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2073409466 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2074512392 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2074752556 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2077155064 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2086337008 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2090674385 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2092107902 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2095044317 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2101415660 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2107031757 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2115034896 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2116217170 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2125608113 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2127306266 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2130792563 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2132623187 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2134614455 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2141896918 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2142441704 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2144392584 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2147138377 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2148913482 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2149855908 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2155449866 @default.
• W2012238618 cites W2160786286 @default.

• next