FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2012241769> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2012241769 endingPage "61" @default.
• W2012241769 startingPage "53" @default.
• W2012241769 abstract "Objective Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma has been developed for the detection of fetal aneuploidy. Clinical trials have shown high sensitivity and specificity for trisomy 21 (T21) in both high-risk and average-risk populations. Although its great potential for prenatal medicine is evident, more information regarding the consequences of implementing NIPT in a national programme for prenatal screening is required. Study design A decision-analytic model was developed to compare costs and outcomes of current clinical practice in The Netherlands using conventional screening only, with two alternatives: implementing NIPT as an optional secondary screening test for those pregnancies complicated by a high risk for T21, and implementing NIPT as primary screening test, replacing conventional screening. Probability estimates were derived from a systematic review of international literature. Costs were determined from a health-care perspective. Data were analysed to obtain outcomes, total costs, relative costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for the different strategies. Sensitivity analysis was used to assess the impact of assumptions on model results. Results Implementing NIPT as an optional secondary, or as primary screening test will increase T21 detection rate by 36% (from 46.8% to 63.5%) and 54% (from 46.8% to 72.0%), simultaneously decreasing the average risk of procedure-related miscarriage by 44% (from 0.0168% to 0.0094% per pregnant woman) and 62% (from 0.0168% to 0.0064% per pregnant woman), respectively. None of the strategies clearly dominated: current clinical practice is the least costly, whereas implementing NIPT will cause total costs of the programme to increase by 21% (from €257.09 to €311.74 per pregnant woman), leading to an ICER of k€94 per detected case of T21, when utilised as an optional secondary screening test and by 157% (from €257.09 to €660.94 per pregnant woman), leading to an ICER of k€460 per detected case of T21, when utilised as primary screening test. However, implementing NIPT as triage test did result in the lowest expected relative costs per case of T21 diagnosed (k€141). Conclusion NIPT should be implemented in national health care as an optional secondary screening test for those pregnancies complicated by a high risk for T21." @default.
• W2012241769 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2012241769 creator A5039654436 @default.
• W2012241769 creator A5070217324 @default.
• W2012241769 creator A5077141365 @default.
• W2012241769 creator A5082805997 @default.
• W2012241769 creator A5087964773 @default.
• W2012241769 creator A5089131541 @default.
• W2012241769 date "2014-11-01" @default.
• W2012241769 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2012241769 title "The consequences of implementing non-invasive prenatal testing in Dutch national health care: a cost-effectiveness analysis" @default.
• W2012241769 cites W1503074753 @default.
• W2012241769 cites W1596268237 @default.
• W2012241769 cites W1613192006 @default.
• W2012241769 cites W1902774068 @default.
• W2012241769 cites W1973591786 @default.
• W2012241769 cites W1984290204 @default.
• W2012241769 cites W1987294304 @default.
• W2012241769 cites W2012337918 @default.
• W2012241769 cites W2046146692 @default.
• W2012241769 cites W2049706382 @default.
• W2012241769 cites W2060475024 @default.
• W2012241769 cites W2074678889 @default.
• W2012241769 cites W2085866058 @default.
• W2012241769 cites W2095229596 @default.
• W2012241769 cites W2096555948 @default.
• W2012241769 cites W2098890272 @default.
• W2012241769 cites W2100977485 @default.
• W2012241769 cites W2102936248 @default.
• W2012241769 cites W2108641027 @default.
• W2012241769 cites W2120835860 @default.
• W2012241769 cites W2123370218 @default.
• W2012241769 cites W2126738653 @default.
• W2012241769 cites W2132238722 @default.
• W2012241769 cites W2134164600 @default.
• W2012241769 cites W2144067971 @default.
• W2012241769 cites W2144864741 @default.
• W2012241769 cites W2156283009 @default.
• W2012241769 cites W2160730845 @default.
• W2012241769 cites W2165804407 @default.
• W2012241769 cites W2172268977 @default.
• W2012241769 cites W2740669386 @default.
• W2012241769 cites W4361868026 @default.
• W2012241769 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.08.028" @default.
• W2012241769 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25238658" @default.
• W2012241769 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2012241769 type Work @default.
• W2012241769 sameAs 2012241769 @default.
• W2012241769 citedByCount "53" @default.
• W2012241769 countsByYear W20122417692015 @default.
• W2012241769 countsByYear W20122417692016 @default.
• W2012241769 countsByYear W20122417692017 @default.
• W2012241769 countsByYear W20122417692018 @default.
• W2012241769 countsByYear W20122417692019 @default.
• W2012241769 countsByYear W20122417692020 @default.
• W2012241769 countsByYear W20122417692021 @default.
• W2012241769 countsByYear W20122417692022 @default.
• W2012241769 countsByYear W20122417692023 @default.
• W2012241769 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2012241769 hasAuthorship W2012241769A5039654436 @default.
• W2012241769 hasAuthorship W2012241769A5070217324 @default.
• W2012241769 hasAuthorship W2012241769A5077141365 @default.
• W2012241769 hasAuthorship W2012241769A5082805997 @default.
• W2012241769 hasAuthorship W2012241769A5087964773 @default.
• W2012241769 hasAuthorship W2012241769A5089131541 @default.
• W2012241769 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W2012241769 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2012241769 hasConcept C152110520 @default.
• W2012241769 hasConcept C172680121 @default.
• W2012241769 hasConcept C2775887326 @default.
• W2012241769 hasConcept C2776210078 @default.
• W2012241769 hasConcept C2776229224 @default.
• W2012241769 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W2012241769 hasConcept C2778258057 @default.
• W2012241769 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W2012241769 hasConcept C2779245376 @default.
• W2012241769 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2012241769 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W2012241769 hasConcept C2992422692 @default.
• W2012241769 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2012241769 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2012241769 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2012241769 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2012241769 hasConceptScore W2012241769C131872663 @default.
• W2012241769 hasConceptScore W2012241769C151730666 @default.
• W2012241769 hasConceptScore W2012241769C152110520 @default.
• W2012241769 hasConceptScore W2012241769C172680121 @default.
• W2012241769 hasConceptScore W2012241769C2775887326 @default.
• W2012241769 hasConceptScore W2012241769C2776210078 @default.
• W2012241769 hasConceptScore W2012241769C2776229224 @default.
• W2012241769 hasConceptScore W2012241769C2777267654 @default.
• W2012241769 hasConceptScore W2012241769C2778258057 @default.
• W2012241769 hasConceptScore W2012241769C2779234561 @default.
• W2012241769 hasConceptScore W2012241769C2779245376 @default.
• W2012241769 hasConceptScore W2012241769C2908647359 @default.
• W2012241769 hasConceptScore W2012241769C29456083 @default.
• W2012241769 hasConceptScore W2012241769C2992422692 @default.
• W2012241769 hasConceptScore W2012241769C54355233 @default.

• next