FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2012289908> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2012289908 endingPage "2390" @default.
• W2012289908 startingPage "2383" @default.
• W2012289908 abstract "The aim of this study is to investigate the influence of the body of the metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) dosimeter in measuring the electron backscatter from lead. The electron backscatter factor (EBF), which is defined as the ratio of dose at the tissue-lead interface to the dose at the same point without the presence of backscatter, was calculated by the Monte Carlo simulation using the GEANT4 code. Electron beams with energies of 4, 6, 9, and 12 MeV were used in the simulation. It was found that in the presence of the MOSFET body, the EBFs were underestimated by about 2%-0.9% for electron beam energies of 4-12 MeV, respectively. The trend of the decrease of EBF with an increase of electron energy can be explained by the small MOSFET dosimeter, mainly made of epoxy and silicon, not only attenuated the electron fluence of the electron beam from upstream, but also the electron backscatter generated by the lead underneath the dosimeter. However, this variation of the EBF underestimation is within the same order of the statistical uncertainties as the Monte Carlo simulations, which ranged from 1.3% to 0.8% for the electron energies of 4-12 MeV, due to the small dosimetric volume. Such small EBF deviation is therefore insignificant when the uncertainty of the Monte Carlo simulation is taken into account. Corresponding measurements were carried out and uncertainties compared to Monte Carlo results were within +/- 2%. Spectra of energy deposited by the backscattered electrons in dosimetric volumes with and without the lead and MOSFET were determined by Monte Carlo simulations. It was found that in both cases, when the MOSFET body is either present or absent in the simulation, deviations of electron energy spectra with and without the lead decrease with an increase of the electron beam energy. Moreover, the softer spectrum of the backscattered electron when lead is present can result in a reduction of the MOSFET response due to stronger recombination in the SiO2 gate. It is concluded that the MOSFET dosimeter performed well for measuring the electron backscatter from lead using electron beams. The uncertainty of EBF determined by comparing the results of Monte Carlo simulations and measurements is well within the accuracy of the MOSFET dosimeter (< +/- 4.2%) provided by the manufacturer." @default.
• W2012289908 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2012289908 creator A5046317049 @default.
• W2012289908 creator A5057714646 @default.
• W2012289908 date "2008-05-19" @default.
• W2012289908 modified "2023-10-05" @default.
• W2012289908 title "Monte Carlo simulation of MOSFET dosimeter for electron backscatter using the <scp>GEANT4</scp> code" @default.
• W2012289908 cites W1971854791 @default.
• W2012289908 cites W1977813169 @default.
• W2012289908 cites W1991738361 @default.
• W2012289908 cites W1992324769 @default.
• W2012289908 cites W2000886202 @default.
• W2012289908 cites W2007464382 @default.
• W2012289908 cites W2024074304 @default.
• W2012289908 cites W2026359758 @default.
• W2012289908 cites W2028618100 @default.
• W2012289908 cites W2053825572 @default.
• W2012289908 cites W2063023042 @default.
• W2012289908 cites W2064419667 @default.
• W2012289908 cites W2070900762 @default.
• W2012289908 cites W2075715694 @default.
• W2012289908 cites W2092886424 @default.
• W2012289908 cites W2111010566 @default.
• W2012289908 cites W2123883304 @default.
• W2012289908 cites W2128881154 @default.
• W2012289908 cites W2131051762 @default.
• W2012289908 cites W2134193704 @default.
• W2012289908 cites W2147922350 @default.
• W2012289908 cites W2148079009 @default.
• W2012289908 cites W2152335441 @default.
• W2012289908 cites W2588332725 @default.
• W2012289908 cites W4244204380 @default.
• W2012289908 doi "https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2924221" @default.
• W2012289908 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18649471" @default.
• W2012289908 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2012289908 type Work @default.
• W2012289908 sameAs 2012289908 @default.
• W2012289908 citedByCount "11" @default.
• W2012289908 countsByYear W20122899082013 @default.
• W2012289908 countsByYear W20122899082015 @default.
• W2012289908 countsByYear W20122899082016 @default.
• W2012289908 countsByYear W20122899082020 @default.
• W2012289908 countsByYear W20122899082021 @default.
• W2012289908 countsByYear W20122899082023 @default.
• W2012289908 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2012289908 hasAuthorship W2012289908A5046317049 @default.
• W2012289908 hasAuthorship W2012289908A5057714646 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConcept C105636585 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConcept C111337013 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConcept C147120987 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConcept C153385146 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConcept C165801399 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConcept C172385210 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConcept C185544564 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConcept C19499675 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConcept C22078206 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConcept C2778413303 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConcept C30354325 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConcept C30475298 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConcept C555944384 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConcept C75088862 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConcept C76155785 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConcept C95312477 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConceptScore W2012289908C105636585 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConceptScore W2012289908C105795698 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConceptScore W2012289908C111337013 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConceptScore W2012289908C120665830 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConceptScore W2012289908C121332964 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConceptScore W2012289908C147120987 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConceptScore W2012289908C153385146 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConceptScore W2012289908C165801399 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConceptScore W2012289908C172385210 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConceptScore W2012289908C185544564 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConceptScore W2012289908C192562407 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConceptScore W2012289908C19499675 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConceptScore W2012289908C22078206 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConceptScore W2012289908C2778413303 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConceptScore W2012289908C2989005 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConceptScore W2012289908C30354325 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConceptScore W2012289908C30475298 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConceptScore W2012289908C33923547 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConceptScore W2012289908C41008148 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConceptScore W2012289908C555944384 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConceptScore W2012289908C62520636 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConceptScore W2012289908C71924100 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConceptScore W2012289908C75088862 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConceptScore W2012289908C76155785 @default.
• W2012289908 hasConceptScore W2012289908C95312477 @default.
• W2012289908 hasIssue "6Part1" @default.

• next