Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2012307911> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 55 of
55
with 100 items per page.
- W2012307911 endingPage "1189" @default.
- W2012307911 startingPage "1178" @default.
- W2012307911 abstract "Abstract The expressions tack, tackiness, and stickiness have been in use since the beginning of the rubber industry. During the years their meaning has changed considerably. The first occasion where tackiness was mentioned was in the case of crude natural rubber. The surface of the rubber became tacky or sticky during storage. This phenomenon has been thoroughly discussed in the literature. As a general conclusion it was accepted that both oxidation and depolymerisation occurred. Three factors were reported to be the cause of these processes: light, traces of copper, and manganese. From our point of view we would call this effect stickiness, as we are only interested in the building tack of rubber. In the period when the only rubber was natural rubber and high loadings of highly active fillers were not generally used in compounds, building tack was no problem. Building tack was first mentioned in a publication by Griffith and Jones in 1928. They started their experiments by measuring tack in their search for methods to prevent cotton liners from sticking to unvulcanized rubber. One would have expected much work on the measurement and improvement of tack in Germany and Russia during the development of synthetic rubbers. However, this only proved to be the case in Russia. The first publication available was the translation of an article by Voyutskii and Margolina in 1957. From Voyutskii's work we were able to trace the first article in 1935 by Zhukov and Talmud, who studied the adhesive power of synthetic rubber. In the USA the first theoretical approach to the subject was by Josefowitz and Mark in 1942, who at that time did not realize the difference between stickiness and tack. This difference became clear when lack of tack became the big problem in the use of synthetic rubber. In many cases it was found that addition of resins and softeners gave a very sticky compound which had no building tack at all. The tack problem was first discussed at the ASTM symposium on the application of synthetic rubbers in 1944 by Juve who gave a definition of building tack. From that time, the problem has been studied regularly, especially from the practical side, to find ways and means to improve the building tack of synthetic rubbers." @default.
- W2012307911 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2012307911 creator A5074811265 @default.
- W2012307911 date "1964-11-01" @default.
- W2012307911 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
- W2012307911 title "Tack in Rubber" @default.
- W2012307911 doi "https://doi.org/10.5254/1.3540398" @default.
- W2012307911 hasPublicationYear "1964" @default.
- W2012307911 type Work @default.
- W2012307911 sameAs 2012307911 @default.
- W2012307911 citedByCount "16" @default.
- W2012307911 countsByYear W20123079112014 @default.
- W2012307911 countsByYear W20123079112017 @default.
- W2012307911 countsByYear W20123079112018 @default.
- W2012307911 countsByYear W20123079112020 @default.
- W2012307911 countsByYear W20123079112021 @default.
- W2012307911 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2012307911 hasAuthorship W2012307911A5074811265 @default.
- W2012307911 hasConcept C126348684 @default.
- W2012307911 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
- W2012307911 hasConcept C176933379 @default.
- W2012307911 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
- W2012307911 hasConcept C2779227376 @default.
- W2012307911 hasConcept C45014336 @default.
- W2012307911 hasConcept C51179264 @default.
- W2012307911 hasConcept C68928338 @default.
- W2012307911 hasConceptScore W2012307911C126348684 @default.
- W2012307911 hasConceptScore W2012307911C159985019 @default.
- W2012307911 hasConceptScore W2012307911C176933379 @default.
- W2012307911 hasConceptScore W2012307911C192562407 @default.
- W2012307911 hasConceptScore W2012307911C2779227376 @default.
- W2012307911 hasConceptScore W2012307911C45014336 @default.
- W2012307911 hasConceptScore W2012307911C51179264 @default.
- W2012307911 hasConceptScore W2012307911C68928338 @default.
- W2012307911 hasIssue "5" @default.
- W2012307911 hasLocation W20123079111 @default.
- W2012307911 hasOpenAccess W2012307911 @default.
- W2012307911 hasPrimaryLocation W20123079111 @default.
- W2012307911 hasRelatedWork W1999450951 @default.
- W2012307911 hasRelatedWork W2289462269 @default.
- W2012307911 hasRelatedWork W2290442505 @default.
- W2012307911 hasRelatedWork W2325349200 @default.
- W2012307911 hasRelatedWork W3186840315 @default.
- W2012307911 hasRelatedWork W4212811008 @default.
- W2012307911 hasRelatedWork W4223604342 @default.
- W2012307911 hasRelatedWork W4237283818 @default.
- W2012307911 hasRelatedWork W4248835514 @default.
- W2012307911 hasRelatedWork W2184594257 @default.
- W2012307911 hasVolume "37" @default.
- W2012307911 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2012307911 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2012307911 magId "2012307911" @default.
- W2012307911 workType "article" @default.