FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2012357772> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2012357772 endingPage "333.e7" @default.
• W2012357772 startingPage "333.e1" @default.
• W2012357772 abstract "Objective Maternal morbidity is increasing in the United States. Our objectives were to examine whether a labor and delivery (L&D) provider model with regular maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) coverage decreases the rates of maternal morbidity during delivery hospitalizations and has an impact on obstetrician-gynecologist residents' perceptions of safety and education. Study Design We performed a retrospective cohort study to compare the rates of maternal morbidity before and after the implementation of an MFM-centered coverage model on L&D. Outcomes were identified using International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision, codes. The primary outcome was a composite of severe maternal morbidity. Additionally, obstetrician-gynecologist residents completed an anonymous survey asking them to compare coverage models, and their Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology examination scores were compared. Results Data from 4715 deliveries were included. There were no differences in composite morbidity or individual adverse outcomes. Most residents (81.3%) preferred the new provider model, with median 5-point Likert scores indicating perceived increases in safety and education. Mean Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology scores improved in the 18 residents exposed to both models. Conclusion Although the MFM-centered provider model appears to have had a positive impact on residents' perceptions of safety and education, it was not associated with significant changes in severe maternal morbidity. Maternal morbidity is increasing in the United States. Our objectives were to examine whether a labor and delivery (L&D) provider model with regular maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) coverage decreases the rates of maternal morbidity during delivery hospitalizations and has an impact on obstetrician-gynecologist residents' perceptions of safety and education. We performed a retrospective cohort study to compare the rates of maternal morbidity before and after the implementation of an MFM-centered coverage model on L&D. Outcomes were identified using International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision, codes. The primary outcome was a composite of severe maternal morbidity. Additionally, obstetrician-gynecologist residents completed an anonymous survey asking them to compare coverage models, and their Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology examination scores were compared. Data from 4715 deliveries were included. There were no differences in composite morbidity or individual adverse outcomes. Most residents (81.3%) preferred the new provider model, with median 5-point Likert scores indicating perceived increases in safety and education. Mean Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology scores improved in the 18 residents exposed to both models. Although the MFM-centered provider model appears to have had a positive impact on residents' perceptions of safety and education, it was not associated with significant changes in severe maternal morbidity." @default.
• W2012357772 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2012357772 creator A5020861250 @default.
• W2012357772 creator A5024944801 @default.
• W2012357772 creator A5025111984 @default.
• W2012357772 creator A5068357772 @default.
• W2012357772 date "2014-04-01" @default.
• W2012357772 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2012357772 title "Does a maternal-fetal medicine–centered labor and delivery coverage model put the ‘M’ back in MFM?" @default.
• W2012357772 cites W1517139124 @default.
• W2012357772 cites W2052340253 @default.
• W2012357772 cites W2058927033 @default.
• W2012357772 cites W2078850564 @default.
• W2012357772 cites W2089364632 @default.
• W2012357772 cites W2335303243 @default.
• W2012357772 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.008" @default.
• W2012357772 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24560556" @default.
• W2012357772 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2012357772 type Work @default.
• W2012357772 sameAs 2012357772 @default.
• W2012357772 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2012357772 countsByYear W20123577722021 @default.
• W2012357772 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2012357772 hasAuthorship W2012357772A5020861250 @default.
• W2012357772 hasAuthorship W2012357772A5024944801 @default.
• W2012357772 hasAuthorship W2012357772A5025111984 @default.
• W2012357772 hasAuthorship W2012357772A5068357772 @default.
• W2012357772 hasConcept C105776082 @default.
• W2012357772 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2012357772 hasConcept C10885799 @default.
• W2012357772 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W2012357772 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2012357772 hasConcept C154269507 @default.
• W2012357772 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2012357772 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W2012357772 hasConcept C3018031340 @default.
• W2012357772 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2012357772 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2012357772 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2012357772 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2012357772 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2012357772 hasConceptScore W2012357772C105776082 @default.
• W2012357772 hasConceptScore W2012357772C105795698 @default.
• W2012357772 hasConceptScore W2012357772C10885799 @default.
• W2012357772 hasConceptScore W2012357772C131872663 @default.
• W2012357772 hasConceptScore W2012357772C141071460 @default.
• W2012357772 hasConceptScore W2012357772C154269507 @default.
• W2012357772 hasConceptScore W2012357772C167135981 @default.
• W2012357772 hasConceptScore W2012357772C2779234561 @default.
• W2012357772 hasConceptScore W2012357772C3018031340 @default.
• W2012357772 hasConceptScore W2012357772C33923547 @default.
• W2012357772 hasConceptScore W2012357772C512399662 @default.
• W2012357772 hasConceptScore W2012357772C54355233 @default.
• W2012357772 hasConceptScore W2012357772C71924100 @default.
• W2012357772 hasConceptScore W2012357772C86803240 @default.
• W2012357772 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2012357772 hasLocation W20123577721 @default.
• W2012357772 hasLocation W20123577722 @default.
• W2012357772 hasOpenAccess W2012357772 @default.
• W2012357772 hasPrimaryLocation W20123577721 @default.
• W2012357772 hasRelatedWork W2105151527 @default.
• W2012357772 hasRelatedWork W2396068384 @default.
• W2012357772 hasRelatedWork W2432817251 @default.
• W2012357772 hasRelatedWork W2569377883 @default.
• W2012357772 hasRelatedWork W2996447370 @default.
• W2012357772 hasRelatedWork W3013145321 @default.
• W2012357772 hasRelatedWork W3158965281 @default.
• W2012357772 hasRelatedWork W3208090289 @default.
• W2012357772 hasRelatedWork W3210359220 @default.
• W2012357772 hasRelatedWork W4255376461 @default.
• W2012357772 hasVolume "210" @default.
• W2012357772 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2012357772 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2012357772 magId "2012357772" @default.
• W2012357772 workType "article" @default.