Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2012389755> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 75 of
75
with 100 items per page.
- W2012389755 endingPage "189" @default.
- W2012389755 startingPage "188" @default.
- W2012389755 abstract "In their Letter in TREE [ 1 Frankham R. et al. 50/500 rule and minimum viable populations: response to Jamieson and Allendorf. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2013; 28: 187-188 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (34) Google Scholar ], Frankham et al. criticize several aspects of our review of how to apply the 50/500 rule to minimum viable populations (MVPs) [ 2 Jamieson I.G. Allendorf F.W. How does the 50/500 rule apply to MVPs?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2012; 27: 578-584 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (186) Google Scholar ]. Unfortunately, they do not address our primary conclusion, that the 500 in the 50/500 rule should not be used as a threshold to make triage decisions to allocate conservation resources. Neither do they address our assertion that converting 500 to a threshold of 5000 individuals using an Ne/NC (effective over census population size) ratio of 10% is not appropriate because of the great variability in this ratio observed among species [ 2 Jamieson I.G. Allendorf F.W. How does the 50/500 rule apply to MVPs?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2012; 27: 578-584 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (186) Google Scholar ]. Rather, their primary point is that we assert incorrectly that there is a ‘lack of evidence for causal connections between genetic factors, demography, and extinction risk’ [ 1 Frankham R. et al. 50/500 rule and minimum viable populations: response to Jamieson and Allendorf. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2013; 28: 187-188 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (34) Google Scholar ]. Their entire Letter provides detailed evidence for this point. Unfortunately, their reply largely overlooks our point that the justifications for the 50 and the 500 in the 50/500 rule are fundamentally different." @default.
- W2012389755 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2012389755 creator A5002354944 @default.
- W2012389755 creator A5057722544 @default.
- W2012389755 date "2013-04-01" @default.
- W2012389755 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W2012389755 title "A school of red herring: reply to Frankham et al." @default.
- W2012389755 cites W1986240024 @default.
- W2012389755 cites W2065743881 @default.
- W2012389755 cites W2140894093 @default.
- W2012389755 cites W2145709393 @default.
- W2012389755 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.01.012" @default.
- W2012389755 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23414672" @default.
- W2012389755 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
- W2012389755 type Work @default.
- W2012389755 sameAs 2012389755 @default.
- W2012389755 citedByCount "11" @default.
- W2012389755 countsByYear W20123897552013 @default.
- W2012389755 countsByYear W20123897552015 @default.
- W2012389755 countsByYear W20123897552016 @default.
- W2012389755 countsByYear W20123897552017 @default.
- W2012389755 countsByYear W20123897552018 @default.
- W2012389755 countsByYear W20123897552021 @default.
- W2012389755 countsByYear W20123897552022 @default.
- W2012389755 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2012389755 hasAuthorship W2012389755A5002354944 @default.
- W2012389755 hasAuthorship W2012389755A5057722544 @default.
- W2012389755 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W2012389755 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2012389755 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
- W2012389755 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
- W2012389755 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2012389755 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2012389755 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2012389755 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
- W2012389755 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
- W2012389755 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
- W2012389755 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W2012389755 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2012389755 hasConcept C83867959 @default.
- W2012389755 hasConceptScore W2012389755C105795698 @default.
- W2012389755 hasConceptScore W2012389755C144024400 @default.
- W2012389755 hasConceptScore W2012389755C149923435 @default.
- W2012389755 hasConceptScore W2012389755C154945302 @default.
- W2012389755 hasConceptScore W2012389755C15744967 @default.
- W2012389755 hasConceptScore W2012389755C17744445 @default.
- W2012389755 hasConceptScore W2012389755C199539241 @default.
- W2012389755 hasConceptScore W2012389755C205649164 @default.
- W2012389755 hasConceptScore W2012389755C2779473830 @default.
- W2012389755 hasConceptScore W2012389755C2908647359 @default.
- W2012389755 hasConceptScore W2012389755C33923547 @default.
- W2012389755 hasConceptScore W2012389755C41008148 @default.
- W2012389755 hasConceptScore W2012389755C83867959 @default.
- W2012389755 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W2012389755 hasLocation W20123897551 @default.
- W2012389755 hasLocation W20123897552 @default.
- W2012389755 hasOpenAccess W2012389755 @default.
- W2012389755 hasPrimaryLocation W20123897551 @default.
- W2012389755 hasRelatedWork W1488457491 @default.
- W2012389755 hasRelatedWork W1869547748 @default.
- W2012389755 hasRelatedWork W1987536918 @default.
- W2012389755 hasRelatedWork W2169901951 @default.
- W2012389755 hasRelatedWork W2324018445 @default.
- W2012389755 hasRelatedWork W2490076021 @default.
- W2012389755 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W2012389755 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W2012389755 hasRelatedWork W3199071977 @default.
- W2012389755 hasRelatedWork W4230156786 @default.
- W2012389755 hasVolume "28" @default.
- W2012389755 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2012389755 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2012389755 magId "2012389755" @default.
- W2012389755 workType "article" @default.