Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2012502707> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 65 of
65
with 100 items per page.
- W2012502707 endingPage "80" @default.
- W2012502707 startingPage "64" @default.
- W2012502707 abstract "Abstract In order to constrain morphological theory one could hypothesise that all allomorphy must be conditioned locally, in the sense that morphemes must be adjacent (and perhaps within the same word) to be able to influence the selection of allomorphs. In principle the restrictive force of such a constraint would obviously be considerable, in particular with allomorphy where the determining factors are morphological rather than purely phonological and an adjacency requirement hence cannot be motivated on phonological grounds. It is also obvious, however, that the empirical import of such a constraint could vary depending on one's understanding of the crucial notions in terms of which it is stated, and of course also on one's analyses of the data where the constraint is invoked. The adjacency requirement may, for example, be conceived of as pertaining to linear contiguity of formatives or to operational succession, and with complex words resulting from prefixation operationally alternating with suffixation linear and operational sequences do not coincide. And evidently there are also differences of opinion concerning the notions of morpheme and allomorphy themselves, not to mention those concerning which general descriptive approach (such as Item and Arrangement, Item and Process, Word and Paradigm) to prefer. Nevertheless, irrespective of all possible disagreements about details as well as principles, some kind of constraint against distant conditioning of allomorphy would seem to command much intuitive appeal, and in one guise or another indeed has often been assumed, explicitly or tacitly, in morphological analyses and theories. Even if it should turn out that an adjacency constraint, however formulated, admits of exceptions, one would hope that these will be exceedingly rare and attributable to unusual circumstances of one kind or another. 1 See Plank (1982) for a more extensive discussion of this constraint, of its various formulations in the relevant literature, and especially of the empirical problems it encounters. There are indications, incidentally, that the constraint at issue pertains not only to word structure but also to phrase structure (cp. e.g. Plank 1984)" @default.
- W2012502707 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2012502707 creator A5081678027 @default.
- W2012502707 date "1985-07-01" @default.
- W2012502707 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W2012502707 title "How disgrace-ful" @default.
- W2012502707 cites W2020322314 @default.
- W2012502707 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.1985.10415446" @default.
- W2012502707 hasPublicationYear "1985" @default.
- W2012502707 type Work @default.
- W2012502707 sameAs 2012502707 @default.
- W2012502707 citedByCount "2" @default.
- W2012502707 countsByYear W20125027072012 @default.
- W2012502707 countsByYear W20125027072016 @default.
- W2012502707 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2012502707 hasAuthorship W2012502707A5081678027 @default.
- W2012502707 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
- W2012502707 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2012502707 hasConcept C148934300 @default.
- W2012502707 hasConcept C165297611 @default.
- W2012502707 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
- W2012502707 hasConcept C26826806 @default.
- W2012502707 hasConcept C2776036281 @default.
- W2012502707 hasConcept C2778589607 @default.
- W2012502707 hasConcept C2781082764 @default.
- W2012502707 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W2012502707 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2012502707 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W2012502707 hasConcept C68767595 @default.
- W2012502707 hasConcept C94109646 @default.
- W2012502707 hasConceptScore W2012502707C111919701 @default.
- W2012502707 hasConceptScore W2012502707C138885662 @default.
- W2012502707 hasConceptScore W2012502707C148934300 @default.
- W2012502707 hasConceptScore W2012502707C165297611 @default.
- W2012502707 hasConceptScore W2012502707C2524010 @default.
- W2012502707 hasConceptScore W2012502707C26826806 @default.
- W2012502707 hasConceptScore W2012502707C2776036281 @default.
- W2012502707 hasConceptScore W2012502707C2778589607 @default.
- W2012502707 hasConceptScore W2012502707C2781082764 @default.
- W2012502707 hasConceptScore W2012502707C33923547 @default.
- W2012502707 hasConceptScore W2012502707C41008148 @default.
- W2012502707 hasConceptScore W2012502707C41895202 @default.
- W2012502707 hasConceptScore W2012502707C68767595 @default.
- W2012502707 hasConceptScore W2012502707C94109646 @default.
- W2012502707 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W2012502707 hasLocation W20125027071 @default.
- W2012502707 hasOpenAccess W2012502707 @default.
- W2012502707 hasPrimaryLocation W20125027071 @default.
- W2012502707 hasRelatedWork W1231984600 @default.
- W2012502707 hasRelatedWork W1540341990 @default.
- W2012502707 hasRelatedWork W1894162226 @default.
- W2012502707 hasRelatedWork W2012502707 @default.
- W2012502707 hasRelatedWork W2034878488 @default.
- W2012502707 hasRelatedWork W2120250373 @default.
- W2012502707 hasRelatedWork W2488002572 @default.
- W2012502707 hasRelatedWork W2623115049 @default.
- W2012502707 hasRelatedWork W2802736744 @default.
- W2012502707 hasRelatedWork W4220901055 @default.
- W2012502707 hasVolume "19" @default.
- W2012502707 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2012502707 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2012502707 magId "2012502707" @default.
- W2012502707 workType "article" @default.