FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2012682248> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2012682248 endingPage "692" @default.
• W2012682248 startingPage "685" @default.
• W2012682248 abstract "Previous studies reported adverse impacts of traffic-related air pollution exposure on pregnancy outcomes. Yet, little information exists on how effect estimates are impacted by the different exposure assessment methods employed in these studies.To compare effect estimates for traffic-related air pollution exposure and preeclampsia, preterm birth (gestational age less than 37 weeks), and very preterm birth (gestational age less than 30 weeks) based on four commonly used exposure assessment methods.We identified 81,186 singleton births during 1997-2006 at four hospitals in Los Angeles and Orange Counties, California. Exposures were assigned to individual subjects based on residential address at delivery using the nearest ambient monitoring station data [carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO(2)), nitric oxide (NO), nitrogen oxides (NO(x)), ozone (O(3)), and particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM(2.5)) or less than 10 (PM(10))μm in aerodynamic diameter], both unadjusted and temporally adjusted land-use regression (LUR) model estimates (NO, NO(2), and NO(x)), CALINE4 line-source air dispersion model estimates (NO(x) and PM(2.5)), and a simple traffic-density measure. We employed unconditional logistic regression to analyze preeclampsia in our birth cohort, while for gestational age-matched risk sets with preterm and very preterm birth we employed conditional logistic regression.We observed elevated risks for preeclampsia, preterm birth, and very preterm birth from maternal exposures to traffic air pollutants measured at ambient stations (CO, NO, NO(2), and NO(x)) and modeled through CALINE4 (NO(x) and PM(2.5)) and LUR (NO(2) and NO(x)). Increased risk of preterm birth and very preterm birth were also positively associated with PM(10) and PM(2.5) air pollution measured at ambient stations. For LUR-modeled NO(2) and NO(x) exposures, elevated risks for all the outcomes were observed in Los Angeles only--the region for which the LUR models were initially developed. Unadjusted LUR models often produced odds ratios somewhat larger in size than temporally adjusted models. The size of effect estimates was smaller for exposures based on simpler traffic density measures than the other exposure assessment methods.We generally confirmed that traffic-related air pollution was associated with adverse reproductive outcomes regardless of the exposure assessment method employed, yet the size of the estimated effect depended on how both temporal and spatial variations were incorporated into exposure assessment. The LUR model was not transferable even between two contiguous areas within the same large metropolitan area in Southern California." @default.
• W2012682248 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2012682248 creator A5011120737 @default.
• W2012682248 creator A5061100061 @default.
• W2012682248 creator A5061904596 @default.
• W2012682248 creator A5064427042 @default.
• W2012682248 date "2011-07-01" @default.
• W2012682248 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2012682248 title "Comparing exposure assessment methods for traffic-related air pollution in an adverse pregnancy outcome study" @default.
• W2012682248 cites W1948416010 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W1966313220 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W1972069524 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W1975755498 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W1978557841 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W1980143538 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W1985615891 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W1992762522 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W1995513426 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W1998740005 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W2001202686 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W2001863067 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W2002094444 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W2004322797 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W2004400924 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W2018539650 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W2028286082 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W2050803268 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W2051652489 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W2071077799 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W2072240674 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W2073101895 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W2077817349 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W2078732381 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W2083132829 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W2083885294 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W2087416935 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W2094745850 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W2098637521 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W2099040894 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W2112964831 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W2117574981 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W2126201342 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W2134383876 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W2134885118 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W2155554490 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W2156034511 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W2159057732 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W2159399366 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W2161791222 @default.
• W2012682248 cites W2162954911 @default.
• W2012682248 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2011.03.008" @default.
• W2012682248 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3114297" @default.
• W2012682248 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21453913" @default.
• W2012682248 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2012682248 type Work @default.
• W2012682248 sameAs 2012682248 @default.
• W2012682248 citedByCount "139" @default.
• W2012682248 countsByYear W20126822482012 @default.
• W2012682248 countsByYear W20126822482013 @default.
• W2012682248 countsByYear W20126822482014 @default.
• W2012682248 countsByYear W20126822482015 @default.
• W2012682248 countsByYear W20126822482016 @default.
• W2012682248 countsByYear W20126822482017 @default.
• W2012682248 countsByYear W20126822482018 @default.
• W2012682248 countsByYear W20126822482019 @default.
• W2012682248 countsByYear W20126822482020 @default.
• W2012682248 countsByYear W20126822482021 @default.
• W2012682248 countsByYear W20126822482022 @default.
• W2012682248 countsByYear W20126822482023 @default.
• W2012682248 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2012682248 hasAuthorship W2012682248A5011120737 @default.
• W2012682248 hasAuthorship W2012682248A5061100061 @default.
• W2012682248 hasAuthorship W2012682248A5061904596 @default.
• W2012682248 hasAuthorship W2012682248A5064427042 @default.
• W2012682248 hasBestOaLocation W20126822482 @default.
• W2012682248 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2012682248 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
• W2012682248 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
• W2012682248 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2012682248 hasConcept C2776344615 @default.
• W2012682248 hasConcept C2778376644 @default.
• W2012682248 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W2012682248 hasConcept C2780938740 @default.
• W2012682248 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2012682248 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2012682248 hasConcept C559116025 @default.
• W2012682248 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2012682248 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2012682248 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2012682248 hasConceptScore W2012682248C126322002 @default.
• W2012682248 hasConceptScore W2012682248C151956035 @default.
• W2012682248 hasConceptScore W2012682248C178790620 @default.
• W2012682248 hasConceptScore W2012682248C185592680 @default.
• W2012682248 hasConceptScore W2012682248C2776344615 @default.
• W2012682248 hasConceptScore W2012682248C2778376644 @default.
• W2012682248 hasConceptScore W2012682248C2779234561 @default.
• W2012682248 hasConceptScore W2012682248C2780938740 @default.
• W2012682248 hasConceptScore W2012682248C39432304 @default.

• next