FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2012816078> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2012816078 endingPage "370.e3" @default.
• W2012816078 startingPage "363" @default.
• W2012816078 abstract "Purpose To evaluate the prevalence of refractive errors associated with age, gender, and central corneal thickness and to evaluate astigmatism in the refraction and keratometry in a randomly sampled elderly Japanese population. Design Population-based epidemiologic survey. Participants A random sampling of residents of Tajimi, Japan, aged 40 years or older. A total of 3021 residents (participation rate, 78.1%) participated. Methods Each subject underwent screening examinations including autokeratorefractometry, subjective refraction, best-corrected visual acuity, central corneal thickness measurement, intraocular pressure measurement, slit-lamp examination, fundus photography, and visual field testing. Main Outcome Measures The prevalence of myopia (spherical equivalent [SE], <−0.5 diopters [D]), high myopia (SE, <−5 D), hyperopia (SE, >0.5 D), refractive astigmatism (cylinder, >0.5 D), and anisometropia (difference in SE between eyes, >1.0 D), and the correlation of refractive errors with age, gender, and central corneal thickness. Astigmatism in the refraction and keratometry was analyzed using polar value analysis and the vector calculation method. Results The crude prevalence of myopia, high myopia, hyperopia, refractive astigmatism in the refraction, and anisometropia was 41.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40.0%–43.6%), 8.2% (95% CI, 7.2%–9.2%), 27.9% (95% CI, 26.3%–29.6%), 54.0% (95% CI, 52.1%–55.8%), and 15.1% (95% CI, 13.7%–16.4%), respectively. The prevalence of myopia decreased with age up to 70 to 79 years but increased slightly in patients 80 years and older; the prevalence of hyperopia showed the opposite trend. The prevalence of astigmatism and anisometropia was higher in the older age groups. No significant gender difference was found associated with the refractive status except for keratometric readings. Polar value analysis and the vector calculation method showed a trend toward against-the-rule astigmatism with increasing age in both refractive and keratometric astigmatism, with a discrepancy between the two. Conclusions The overall prevalence of myopia (SE, <−0.5 diopters) was 41.8% in the study population, which is higher than that in population-based studies previously reported. To evaluate the prevalence of refractive errors associated with age, gender, and central corneal thickness and to evaluate astigmatism in the refraction and keratometry in a randomly sampled elderly Japanese population. Population-based epidemiologic survey. A random sampling of residents of Tajimi, Japan, aged 40 years or older. A total of 3021 residents (participation rate, 78.1%) participated. Each subject underwent screening examinations including autokeratorefractometry, subjective refraction, best-corrected visual acuity, central corneal thickness measurement, intraocular pressure measurement, slit-lamp examination, fundus photography, and visual field testing. The prevalence of myopia (spherical equivalent [SE], <−0.5 diopters [D]), high myopia (SE, <−5 D), hyperopia (SE, >0.5 D), refractive astigmatism (cylinder, >0.5 D), and anisometropia (difference in SE between eyes, >1.0 D), and the correlation of refractive errors with age, gender, and central corneal thickness. Astigmatism in the refraction and keratometry was analyzed using polar value analysis and the vector calculation method. The crude prevalence of myopia, high myopia, hyperopia, refractive astigmatism in the refraction, and anisometropia was 41.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40.0%–43.6%), 8.2% (95% CI, 7.2%–9.2%), 27.9% (95% CI, 26.3%–29.6%), 54.0% (95% CI, 52.1%–55.8%), and 15.1% (95% CI, 13.7%–16.4%), respectively. The prevalence of myopia decreased with age up to 70 to 79 years but increased slightly in patients 80 years and older; the prevalence of hyperopia showed the opposite trend. The prevalence of astigmatism and anisometropia was higher in the older age groups. No significant gender difference was found associated with the refractive status except for keratometric readings. Polar value analysis and the vector calculation method showed a trend toward against-the-rule astigmatism with increasing age in both refractive and keratometric astigmatism, with a discrepancy between the two. The overall prevalence of myopia (SE, <−0.5 diopters) was 41.8% in the study population, which is higher than that in population-based studies previously reported." @default.
• W2012816078 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2012816078 creator A5001818094 @default.
• W2012816078 creator A5009628938 @default.
• W2012816078 creator A5055236673 @default.
• W2012816078 creator A5074724972 @default.
• W2012816078 creator A5075399131 @default.
• W2012816078 date "2008-02-01" @default.
• W2012816078 modified "2023-10-09" @default.
• W2012816078 title "Refractive Errors in an Elderly Japanese Population" @default.
• W2012816078 cites W1480510623 @default.
• W2012816078 cites W1580650968 @default.
• W2012816078 cites W180812339 @default.
• W2012816078 cites W1882214116 @default.
• W2012816078 cites W1968895323 @default.
• W2012816078 cites W1975085916 @default.
• W2012816078 cites W1979137922 @default.
• W2012816078 cites W1980525769 @default.
• W2012816078 cites W1987430566 @default.
• W2012816078 cites W1989139641 @default.
• W2012816078 cites W1991748997 @default.
• W2012816078 cites W1992653534 @default.
• W2012816078 cites W2009355616 @default.
• W2012816078 cites W2013154669 @default.
• W2012816078 cites W2016571044 @default.
• W2012816078 cites W2044737971 @default.
• W2012816078 cites W2049782634 @default.
• W2012816078 cites W2051251856 @default.
• W2012816078 cites W2052244669 @default.
• W2012816078 cites W2076549122 @default.
• W2012816078 cites W2082851840 @default.
• W2012816078 cites W2085532914 @default.
• W2012816078 cites W2091042686 @default.
• W2012816078 cites W2092904558 @default.
• W2012816078 cites W2095505940 @default.
• W2012816078 cites W2096549612 @default.
• W2012816078 cites W2105507716 @default.
• W2012816078 cites W2115153828 @default.
• W2012816078 cites W2124569059 @default.
• W2012816078 cites W2126327827 @default.
• W2012816078 cites W2160776746 @default.
• W2012816078 cites W2164887773 @default.
• W2012816078 cites W2165062842 @default.
• W2012816078 cites W2286851469 @default.
• W2012816078 cites W2405445698 @default.
• W2012816078 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.03.075" @default.
• W2012816078 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18243904" @default.
• W2012816078 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2012816078 type Work @default.
• W2012816078 sameAs 2012816078 @default.
• W2012816078 citedByCount "343" @default.
• W2012816078 countsByYear W20128160782012 @default.
• W2012816078 countsByYear W20128160782013 @default.
• W2012816078 countsByYear W20128160782014 @default.
• W2012816078 countsByYear W20128160782015 @default.
• W2012816078 countsByYear W20128160782016 @default.
• W2012816078 countsByYear W20128160782017 @default.
• W2012816078 countsByYear W20128160782018 @default.
• W2012816078 countsByYear W20128160782019 @default.
• W2012816078 countsByYear W20128160782020 @default.
• W2012816078 countsByYear W20128160782021 @default.
• W2012816078 countsByYear W20128160782022 @default.
• W2012816078 countsByYear W20128160782023 @default.
• W2012816078 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2012816078 hasAuthorship W2012816078A5001818094 @default.
• W2012816078 hasAuthorship W2012816078A5009628938 @default.
• W2012816078 hasAuthorship W2012816078A5055236673 @default.
• W2012816078 hasAuthorship W2012816078A5074724972 @default.
• W2012816078 hasAuthorship W2012816078A5075399131 @default.
• W2012816078 hasConcept C109821595 @default.
• W2012816078 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
• W2012816078 hasConcept C119767625 @default.
• W2012816078 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2012816078 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2012816078 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2012816078 hasConcept C204442743 @default.
• W2012816078 hasConcept C259533 @default.
• W2012816078 hasConcept C2778257484 @default.
• W2012816078 hasConcept C2780365402 @default.
• W2012816078 hasConcept C2781135284 @default.
• W2012816078 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2012816078 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2012816078 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2012816078 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2012816078 hasConceptScore W2012816078C109821595 @default.
• W2012816078 hasConceptScore W2012816078C118487528 @default.
• W2012816078 hasConceptScore W2012816078C119767625 @default.
• W2012816078 hasConceptScore W2012816078C120665830 @default.
• W2012816078 hasConceptScore W2012816078C121332964 @default.
• W2012816078 hasConceptScore W2012816078C126322002 @default.
• W2012816078 hasConceptScore W2012816078C204442743 @default.
• W2012816078 hasConceptScore W2012816078C259533 @default.
• W2012816078 hasConceptScore W2012816078C2778257484 @default.
• W2012816078 hasConceptScore W2012816078C2780365402 @default.
• W2012816078 hasConceptScore W2012816078C2781135284 @default.
• W2012816078 hasConceptScore W2012816078C2908647359 @default.
• W2012816078 hasConceptScore W2012816078C44249647 @default.
• W2012816078 hasConceptScore W2012816078C71924100 @default.

• next