FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2012855219> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2012855219 endingPage "51" @default.
• W2012855219 startingPage "46" @default.
• W2012855219 abstract "Background Segmentectomy for small or early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been controversial. Further, video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for lung cancer was accepted during the past decade. We here compared the outcome between VATS segmentectomy and VATS lobectomy for stage I NSCLC. Methods In the retrospective study, 109 consecutive patients in stage I underwent surgery at Oita University Hospital (Oita, Japan) between September 2003 and October 2008. VATS segmentectomy was performed in 38 patients and VATS lobectomy with systemic lymphadenectomy was performed in 71 patients. After clinicopathologic factors were compared in both groups, local recurrence rates and survivals were compared. Results Five of 38 VATS segmentectomy and eight of 71 VATS lobectomy patients relapsed during the follow-up period (median 27.5 mo). In the relapsed patients after VATS segmentectomy, three (7.9%) were local recurrences and two (5.3%) were distant metastases. On the other hand, four (5.6%) were local recurrence and four (5.6%) were distant metastases in the VATS lobectomy group. There was no significant difference between the two groups. Furthermore, there was no difference in recurrence-free and overall survival between segmentectomy and lobectomy. Conclusions Although the sample size is small, VATS segmentectomy is one of the appropriate procedures for stage I NSCLC. Segmentectomy for small or early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been controversial. Further, video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for lung cancer was accepted during the past decade. We here compared the outcome between VATS segmentectomy and VATS lobectomy for stage I NSCLC. In the retrospective study, 109 consecutive patients in stage I underwent surgery at Oita University Hospital (Oita, Japan) between September 2003 and October 2008. VATS segmentectomy was performed in 38 patients and VATS lobectomy with systemic lymphadenectomy was performed in 71 patients. After clinicopathologic factors were compared in both groups, local recurrence rates and survivals were compared. Five of 38 VATS segmentectomy and eight of 71 VATS lobectomy patients relapsed during the follow-up period (median 27.5 mo). In the relapsed patients after VATS segmentectomy, three (7.9%) were local recurrences and two (5.3%) were distant metastases. On the other hand, four (5.6%) were local recurrence and four (5.6%) were distant metastases in the VATS lobectomy group. There was no significant difference between the two groups. Furthermore, there was no difference in recurrence-free and overall survival between segmentectomy and lobectomy. Although the sample size is small, VATS segmentectomy is one of the appropriate procedures for stage I NSCLC." @default.
• W2012855219 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2012855219 creator A5008772830 @default.
• W2012855219 creator A5016281640 @default.
• W2012855219 creator A5029553820 @default.
• W2012855219 creator A5033485126 @default.
• W2012855219 creator A5035690333 @default.
• W2012855219 creator A5063456684 @default.
• W2012855219 creator A5084608073 @default.
• W2012855219 creator A5090297788 @default.
• W2012855219 date "2011-03-01" @default.
• W2012855219 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2012855219 title "Clinical Impact of Segmentectomy Compared with Lobectomy Under Complete Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery in the Treatment of Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer" @default.
• W2012855219 cites W1969818459 @default.
• W2012855219 cites W1982826926 @default.
• W2012855219 cites W1988125844 @default.
• W2012855219 cites W1993312546 @default.
• W2012855219 cites W2005054043 @default.
• W2012855219 cites W2005939863 @default.
• W2012855219 cites W2031653917 @default.
• W2012855219 cites W2056488706 @default.
• W2012855219 cites W2057604474 @default.
• W2012855219 cites W2075569512 @default.
• W2012855219 cites W2075730546 @default.
• W2012855219 cites W2096631226 @default.
• W2012855219 cites W2116657538 @default.
• W2012855219 cites W2124447880 @default.
• W2012855219 cites W2137207473 @default.
• W2012855219 cites W2153695074 @default.
• W2012855219 cites W2155569669 @default.
• W2012855219 cites W2158742588 @default.
• W2012855219 cites W2167373179 @default.
• W2012855219 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2009.04.006" @default.
• W2012855219 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19560164" @default.
• W2012855219 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2012855219 type Work @default.
• W2012855219 sameAs 2012855219 @default.
• W2012855219 citedByCount "44" @default.
• W2012855219 countsByYear W20128552192012 @default.
• W2012855219 countsByYear W20128552192013 @default.
• W2012855219 countsByYear W20128552192014 @default.
• W2012855219 countsByYear W20128552192015 @default.
• W2012855219 countsByYear W20128552192016 @default.
• W2012855219 countsByYear W20128552192017 @default.
• W2012855219 countsByYear W20128552192018 @default.
• W2012855219 countsByYear W20128552192019 @default.
• W2012855219 countsByYear W20128552192020 @default.
• W2012855219 countsByYear W20128552192021 @default.
• W2012855219 countsByYear W20128552192022 @default.
• W2012855219 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2012855219 hasAuthorship W2012855219A5008772830 @default.
• W2012855219 hasAuthorship W2012855219A5016281640 @default.
• W2012855219 hasAuthorship W2012855219A5029553820 @default.
• W2012855219 hasAuthorship W2012855219A5033485126 @default.
• W2012855219 hasAuthorship W2012855219A5035690333 @default.
• W2012855219 hasAuthorship W2012855219A5063456684 @default.
• W2012855219 hasAuthorship W2012855219A5084608073 @default.
• W2012855219 hasAuthorship W2012855219A5090297788 @default.
• W2012855219 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2012855219 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2012855219 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2012855219 hasConcept C143998085 @default.
• W2012855219 hasConcept C146357865 @default.
• W2012855219 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2012855219 hasConcept C160022790 @default.
• W2012855219 hasConcept C2776256026 @default.
• W2012855219 hasConcept C2776904799 @default.
• W2012855219 hasConcept C2777589429 @default.
• W2012855219 hasConcept C2778211507 @default.
• W2012855219 hasConcept C2780824555 @default.
• W2012855219 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2012855219 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2012855219 hasConceptScore W2012855219C121608353 @default.
• W2012855219 hasConceptScore W2012855219C126322002 @default.
• W2012855219 hasConceptScore W2012855219C141071460 @default.
• W2012855219 hasConceptScore W2012855219C143998085 @default.
• W2012855219 hasConceptScore W2012855219C146357865 @default.
• W2012855219 hasConceptScore W2012855219C151730666 @default.
• W2012855219 hasConceptScore W2012855219C160022790 @default.
• W2012855219 hasConceptScore W2012855219C2776256026 @default.
• W2012855219 hasConceptScore W2012855219C2776904799 @default.
• W2012855219 hasConceptScore W2012855219C2777589429 @default.
• W2012855219 hasConceptScore W2012855219C2778211507 @default.
• W2012855219 hasConceptScore W2012855219C2780824555 @default.
• W2012855219 hasConceptScore W2012855219C71924100 @default.
• W2012855219 hasConceptScore W2012855219C86803240 @default.
• W2012855219 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2012855219 hasLocation W20128552191 @default.
• W2012855219 hasLocation W20128552192 @default.
• W2012855219 hasOpenAccess W2012855219 @default.
• W2012855219 hasPrimaryLocation W20128552191 @default.
• W2012855219 hasRelatedWork W1915600269 @default.
• W2012855219 hasRelatedWork W2009751563 @default.
• W2012855219 hasRelatedWork W2061075677 @default.
• W2012855219 hasRelatedWork W2287431083 @default.
• W2012855219 hasRelatedWork W2497193973 @default.
• W2012855219 hasRelatedWork W2909069119 @default.
• W2012855219 hasRelatedWork W2910522897 @default.

• next