FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2013440123> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2013440123 endingPage "98" @default.
• W2013440123 startingPage "94" @default.
• W2013440123 abstract "In his commentary on our paper (Cooper, Whalen, & Fowler, 1986), Peter Howell (1988) attempts to show that the center of gravity of an acoustic signal is sufficient to predict perceived timing of the signal. In our reply, we confine ourselves to four main points: 1. Howell offers a description of acoustic correlates of perceived timing. As such, it need not conflict with our explanatory account that listeners perceive timing as produced. However, Howell does not have the description right. It conflicts with already published data: . 2. Howell declined to apply his formulas to the stImulI of Cooper et al. and to model their data quantitatively. Apparently, he neglected to try it out on his own stimuli and findings too. It makes the wrong predictions. T?e problem is with his geometry, however; centers ofgravIty of his own stimuli and those of Cooper et al. do pattern in the same way as listener judgments. 3. In a replication and extension ofthe work by Tuller and Fowler (1981), we show that the phonetic composition of a syllable, and not its center of gravity, predicts perceived timing when phonetic composition and center of gravity are opposed in a set of stimuli.. . 4. Our account of perceived and produced tmung meets Howell's proposed criteria for adequacy better than does his own. These points, we acknowledge, go beyond our charge to address Howell's specific complaint that Cooper et al. wrongly discount his view on the basis of their findi?gs. We take the longer route for several reasons. First, although we stand behind our conclusions based on Howell's (1984) remarks, he has elaborated his earlier ideas here and they require their own assessment. Second, it is easy enough to ~ontrast certain pr~dictions of his account and ours expenmentally. In our VIew, Howell should have run such a test to ascertain that his account was worth trying to resuscitate before going to press with his complaint. He did not, and so we did it fo~ him. Finally, our view and Howell's differ markedly m respect to their contexts of theoretical and experimental support. We wanted to point that out." @default.
• W2013440123 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2013440123 creator A5066345571 @default.
• W2013440123 creator A5067439743 @default.
• W2013440123 creator A5069316856 @default.
• W2013440123 date "1988-01-01" @default.
• W2013440123 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2013440123 title "Perceived timing is produced timing: A reply to Howell" @default.
• W2013440123 cites W1970365326 @default.
• W2013440123 cites W2011171364 @default.
• W2013440123 cites W2035162822 @default.
• W2013440123 cites W2044831511 @default.
• W2013440123 cites W2058959024 @default.
• W2013440123 cites W2072851435 @default.
• W2013440123 cites W2356232018 @default.
• W2013440123 cites W2989728284 @default.
• W2013440123 doi "https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03208979" @default.
• W2013440123 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3340506" @default.
• W2013440123 hasPublicationYear "1988" @default.
• W2013440123 type Work @default.
• W2013440123 sameAs 2013440123 @default.
• W2013440123 citedByCount "14" @default.
• W2013440123 countsByYear W20134401232014 @default.
• W2013440123 countsByYear W20134401232022 @default.
• W2013440123 countsByYear W20134401232023 @default.
• W2013440123 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2013440123 hasAuthorship W2013440123A5066345571 @default.
• W2013440123 hasAuthorship W2013440123A5067439743 @default.
• W2013440123 hasAuthorship W2013440123A5069316856 @default.
• W2013440123 hasBestOaLocation W20134401231 @default.
• W2013440123 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2013440123 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2013440123 hasConcept C172081034 @default.
• W2013440123 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2013440123 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W2013440123 hasConceptScore W2013440123C15744967 @default.
• W2013440123 hasConceptScore W2013440123C169760540 @default.
• W2013440123 hasConceptScore W2013440123C172081034 @default.
• W2013440123 hasConceptScore W2013440123C180747234 @default.
• W2013440123 hasConceptScore W2013440123C26760741 @default.
• W2013440123 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2013440123 hasLocation W20134401231 @default.
• W2013440123 hasLocation W20134401232 @default.
• W2013440123 hasOpenAccess W2013440123 @default.
• W2013440123 hasPrimaryLocation W20134401231 @default.
• W2013440123 hasRelatedWork W1980685406 @default.
• W2013440123 hasRelatedWork W1994638219 @default.
• W2013440123 hasRelatedWork W2030766398 @default.
• W2013440123 hasRelatedWork W2033455249 @default.
• W2013440123 hasRelatedWork W2046659574 @default.
• W2013440123 hasRelatedWork W2143625387 @default.
• W2013440123 hasRelatedWork W2301629508 @default.
• W2013440123 hasRelatedWork W2324626245 @default.
• W2013440123 hasRelatedWork W2325903967 @default.
• W2013440123 hasRelatedWork W2811044677 @default.
• W2013440123 hasVolume "43" @default.
• W2013440123 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2013440123 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2013440123 magId "2013440123" @default.
• W2013440123 workType "article" @default.