FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2013469297> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2013469297 endingPage "814" @default.
• W2013469297 startingPage "807" @default.
• W2013469297 abstract "The question of continuity versus discontinuity in modern German history since 1871 has been a dominant theme among historians in the post-World War II era. It has naturally been generated by the unique character and horror of the Third Reich. The inclination to firmly establish, temper or, in some cases, to simply refute the immediate origins in Imperial Germany of the militarism, imperialism, authoritarianism and racism/anti-Semitism of Nazi Germany has explicitly or implicitly formed the basis of much of the scholarship on the Third Reich; at the same time, much of the scholarship on the Second Reich has been cast with an eye toward the failure of the Weimar Republic and the establishment and nature of Hitler’s tyranny. Just as this has been especially true for historians of the Third Reich in their work on anti-Semitism, on Jewish policy during the 1930s and on the mass-murder of European Jews during the Second World War, so too has this tendency characterised the literature on anti-Semitism in its various forms in Imperial Germany between 1871 and 1918. As George Mosse has concluded in his history of European racism: ‘The holocaust has passed. The history of racism which we have told has helped to explain the final solution’.’ Usually with National Socialism and the Holocaust in mind, the literature on anti-Semitism in Imperial Germany has addressed the complex web of political, economic, social, cultural and traditional religious sentiment that formed the basis of hostility toward Jews. The rather tortuous reading of the works of prominent anti-Semitic theorists reveals a high degree of consensus about the nature of the problem, i.e. about the characteristics of alleged Jewish inferiority and depravity and their negative impact on German society. Fantasies about biological inferiority coexisted or were fused with lingering traditional religious myths and biases regarding Judaism and Jewish religious practices. Most saw the Jews as a distinct people rather than a religious community, as historically unwilling and unable to assimilate, as a state within a state, and as determined to carry out their conspiracy to undermine, dominate and exploit the ‘aryan’ world. They deplored the process of Jewish emancipation in the nineteenth century and saw the Jews as alien and as the embodiment of evil in an unsuspecting world. Such reading also reveals differences and, in large measure, confusion and contradictions among anti-Semites, at least on the surface, regarding the best solutions to the so-called Jewish Question. In a recently published essay, Donald Niewyk divides anti-Semites in Germany into three groups in terms of possible solutions: ‘integrationists’ are defined as those who held that Jews simply had to cease being Jews in every way and assimilate completely; ‘segrationists’ were those who wanted to limit or reverse entirely the process of" @default.
• W2013469297 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2013469297 creator A5033791756 @default.
• W2013469297 date "1993-01-01" @default.
• W2013469297 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2013469297 title "Zionism in anti-semitic thought in imperial Germany" @default.
• W2013469297 cites W2030533287 @default.
• W2013469297 cites W2165598819 @default.
• W2013469297 cites W2502021864 @default.
• W2013469297 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-6599(93)90226-g" @default.
• W2013469297 hasPublicationYear "1993" @default.
• W2013469297 type Work @default.
• W2013469297 sameAs 2013469297 @default.
• W2013469297 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2013469297 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2013469297 hasAuthorship W2013469297A5033791756 @default.
• W2013469297 hasConcept C114362828 @default.
• W2013469297 hasConcept C132165367 @default.
• W2013469297 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2013469297 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2013469297 hasConcept C195244886 @default.
• W2013469297 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2013469297 hasConcept C58041660 @default.
• W2013469297 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2013469297 hasConcept C96455323 @default.
• W2013469297 hasConceptScore W2013469297C114362828 @default.
• W2013469297 hasConceptScore W2013469297C132165367 @default.
• W2013469297 hasConceptScore W2013469297C138885662 @default.
• W2013469297 hasConceptScore W2013469297C17744445 @default.
• W2013469297 hasConceptScore W2013469297C195244886 @default.
• W2013469297 hasConceptScore W2013469297C41895202 @default.
• W2013469297 hasConceptScore W2013469297C58041660 @default.
• W2013469297 hasConceptScore W2013469297C95457728 @default.
• W2013469297 hasConceptScore W2013469297C96455323 @default.
• W2013469297 hasIssue "4-6" @default.
• W2013469297 hasLocation W20134692971 @default.
• W2013469297 hasOpenAccess W2013469297 @default.
• W2013469297 hasPrimaryLocation W20134692971 @default.
• W2013469297 hasRelatedWork W2070904806 @default.
• W2013469297 hasRelatedWork W2083634013 @default.
• W2013469297 hasRelatedWork W2290275868 @default.
• W2013469297 hasRelatedWork W2330140837 @default.
• W2013469297 hasRelatedWork W2341102223 @default.
• W2013469297 hasRelatedWork W2503534330 @default.
• W2013469297 hasRelatedWork W2681416937 @default.
• W2013469297 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2013469297 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2013469297 hasRelatedWork W2947945363 @default.
• W2013469297 hasVolume "16" @default.
• W2013469297 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2013469297 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2013469297 magId "2013469297" @default.
• W2013469297 workType "article" @default.