FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2013748451> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2013748451 endingPage "2177" @default.
• W2013748451 startingPage "2155" @default.
• W2013748451 abstract "The study of human—nature relationships has long been central to geographic inquiry. Recent attempts to reconcile the growing demands of the international economy with the equally important concerns about environmental protection can be seen as one challenge to the dominant construction of human—nature relationships. Attempts to ‘green trade’ are well illustrated in the debate about the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the environment. This paper presents three arguments. First, the growing influence of the environmental movement in the USA during the past twenty-five years has embedded concern for the environment in political culture. This ‘politics of the environment’ is exemplified in NAFTA's explicit goal of promoting sustainable development. Including sustainable development as a specified goal thus provided environmentalists a legitimate entry into the NAFTA debate over free trade, development, and environmental protection. Second, it is argued that the NAFTA debate highlights several trade—environment dilemmas, dilemmas which must be addressed in order to reconcile economics and the environment. Particular attention will be paid to the debate about NAFTA and environmental sovereignty. Third, the NAFTA debate brought together two distinct communities: free traders and environmentalists. Far from being two exclusive communities, in this paper I assert that economics and the environment must be seen as interdependent forces which will increasingly interact with each other. In the case of NAFTA, these two communities not only interacted with each other, they created a common ground which made supporting NAFTA acceptable to both interest groups. The creation of a common ground took place through negotiation, debate, and compromise, and thus is a fundamental engagement with human—nature constructions. I conclude that we can expect the environmental community to participate in future trade and development issues because environmentalists now see these areas as critical to reconciling economic—environment and human—nature relationships." @default.
• W2013748451 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2013748451 creator A5074541319 @default.
• W2013748451 date "1996-12-01" @default.
• W2013748451 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2013748451 title "The Greening of Free Trade? The Debate about the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the Environment" @default.
• W2013748451 cites W2005638357 @default.
• W2013748451 cites W2086997525 @default.
• W2013748451 cites W2090784729 @default.
• W2013748451 cites W2108061383 @default.
• W2013748451 cites W2153791301 @default.
• W2013748451 cites W2170638367 @default.
• W2013748451 cites W2317548801 @default.
• W2013748451 cites W2331674044 @default.
• W2013748451 cites W2487166988 @default.
• W2013748451 cites W2494774288 @default.
• W2013748451 cites W2561150101 @default.
• W2013748451 cites W4213234829 @default.
• W2013748451 cites W4233103615 @default.
• W2013748451 cites W4233876001 @default.
• W2013748451 cites W4235610633 @default.
• W2013748451 cites W4240708629 @default.
• W2013748451 cites W4241412938 @default.
• W2013748451 doi "https://doi.org/10.1068/a282155" @default.
• W2013748451 hasPublicationYear "1996" @default.
• W2013748451 type Work @default.
• W2013748451 sameAs 2013748451 @default.
• W2013748451 citedByCount "10" @default.
• W2013748451 countsByYear W20137484512013 @default.
• W2013748451 countsByYear W20137484512017 @default.
• W2013748451 countsByYear W20137484512021 @default.
• W2013748451 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2013748451 hasAuthorship W2013748451A5074541319 @default.
• W2013748451 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W2013748451 hasConcept C155202549 @default.
• W2013748451 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2013748451 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2013748451 hasConcept C182306322 @default.
• W2013748451 hasConcept C185874996 @default.
• W2013748451 hasConcept C186229450 @default.
• W2013748451 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2013748451 hasConcept C2993512723 @default.
• W2013748451 hasConcept C35532855 @default.
• W2013748451 hasConcept C552854447 @default.
• W2013748451 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2013748451 hasConceptScore W2013748451C10138342 @default.
• W2013748451 hasConceptScore W2013748451C155202549 @default.
• W2013748451 hasConceptScore W2013748451C162324750 @default.
• W2013748451 hasConceptScore W2013748451C17744445 @default.
• W2013748451 hasConceptScore W2013748451C182306322 @default.
• W2013748451 hasConceptScore W2013748451C185874996 @default.
• W2013748451 hasConceptScore W2013748451C186229450 @default.
• W2013748451 hasConceptScore W2013748451C199539241 @default.
• W2013748451 hasConceptScore W2013748451C2993512723 @default.
• W2013748451 hasConceptScore W2013748451C35532855 @default.
• W2013748451 hasConceptScore W2013748451C552854447 @default.
• W2013748451 hasConceptScore W2013748451C94625758 @default.
• W2013748451 hasIssue "12" @default.
• W2013748451 hasLocation W20137484511 @default.
• W2013748451 hasOpenAccess W2013748451 @default.
• W2013748451 hasPrimaryLocation W20137484511 @default.
• W2013748451 hasRelatedWork W1513107807 @default.
• W2013748451 hasRelatedWork W1599482306 @default.
• W2013748451 hasRelatedWork W1811984715 @default.
• W2013748451 hasRelatedWork W2283717246 @default.
• W2013748451 hasRelatedWork W2393579578 @default.
• W2013748451 hasRelatedWork W2466187832 @default.
• W2013748451 hasRelatedWork W3122426995 @default.
• W2013748451 hasRelatedWork W3160959805 @default.
• W2013748451 hasRelatedWork W601151453 @default.
• W2013748451 hasRelatedWork W1825086116 @default.
• W2013748451 hasVolume "28" @default.
• W2013748451 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2013748451 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2013748451 magId "2013748451" @default.
• W2013748451 workType "article" @default.