FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2013903917> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2013903917 endingPage "339" @default.
• W2013903917 startingPage "335" @default.
• W2013903917 abstract "Objective To compare the results of transperitoneal laparoscopic vs retroperitoneoscopic simple nephrectomy for benign renal diseases in a prospective randomized design. Methods In this study between January 2009 and August 2013, 31 patients underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy and 31 retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy after randomization. The 2 groups were compared for the visual pain score on the first and second postoperative days as the primary end point of the study. Complications were recorded and graded using Dindo-modified Clavien classification of surgical complications. Secondary objectives were to compare each of the operative techniques in terms of duration of surgery, complication rates, and postoperative convalescence. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 16.0 with P <.05 considered statistically significant. Results The difference in the visual pain score (4.9 vs 2.7 on day 1; 3.2 vs 1.1 on day 2) and the tramadol requirements (167.3 vs 132.8 mg) were statistically significant and more in the transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy. The hospital stay and convalescence were significantly lower in retroperitoneoscopic group. Three patients in transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy group and 2 patients in retroperitoneoscopic group required conversion. Mean time to normal activities was significantly less in retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy group (16.7 ± 3.5 vs 9.34 ± 4.9 days; P = .0001). Conclusion Although both transperitoneal laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic simple nephrectomy are feasible options for nonfunctioning kidneys due to benign renal diseases in adults, retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy is associated with significantly less pain, less analgesic requirement, shorter hospital stay, and short convalescence as compared with transperitoneal laparoscopic approach. To compare the results of transperitoneal laparoscopic vs retroperitoneoscopic simple nephrectomy for benign renal diseases in a prospective randomized design. In this study between January 2009 and August 2013, 31 patients underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy and 31 retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy after randomization. The 2 groups were compared for the visual pain score on the first and second postoperative days as the primary end point of the study. Complications were recorded and graded using Dindo-modified Clavien classification of surgical complications. Secondary objectives were to compare each of the operative techniques in terms of duration of surgery, complication rates, and postoperative convalescence. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 16.0 with P <.05 considered statistically significant. The difference in the visual pain score (4.9 vs 2.7 on day 1; 3.2 vs 1.1 on day 2) and the tramadol requirements (167.3 vs 132.8 mg) were statistically significant and more in the transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy. The hospital stay and convalescence were significantly lower in retroperitoneoscopic group. Three patients in transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy group and 2 patients in retroperitoneoscopic group required conversion. Mean time to normal activities was significantly less in retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy group (16.7 ± 3.5 vs 9.34 ± 4.9 days; P = .0001). Although both transperitoneal laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic simple nephrectomy are feasible options for nonfunctioning kidneys due to benign renal diseases in adults, retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy is associated with significantly less pain, less analgesic requirement, shorter hospital stay, and short convalescence as compared with transperitoneal laparoscopic approach." @default.
• W2013903917 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2013903917 creator A5017608012 @default.
• W2013903917 creator A5052474633 @default.
• W2013903917 creator A5054591902 @default.
• W2013903917 creator A5058935905 @default.
• W2013903917 date "2014-08-01" @default.
• W2013903917 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2013903917 title "Prospective Randomized Comparison of Transperitoneal vs Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Simple Nephrectomy" @default.
• W2013903917 cites W1987175991 @default.
• W2013903917 cites W2001847505 @default.
• W2013903917 cites W2010210054 @default.
• W2013903917 cites W2017863518 @default.
• W2013903917 cites W2070154425 @default.
• W2013903917 cites W4214710897 @default.
• W2013903917 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.04.038" @default.
• W2013903917 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24975713" @default.
• W2013903917 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2013903917 type Work @default.
• W2013903917 sameAs 2013903917 @default.
• W2013903917 citedByCount "26" @default.
• W2013903917 countsByYear W20139039172015 @default.
• W2013903917 countsByYear W20139039172016 @default.
• W2013903917 countsByYear W20139039172017 @default.
• W2013903917 countsByYear W20139039172018 @default.
• W2013903917 countsByYear W20139039172019 @default.
• W2013903917 countsByYear W20139039172020 @default.
• W2013903917 countsByYear W20139039172021 @default.
• W2013903917 countsByYear W20139039172022 @default.
• W2013903917 countsByYear W20139039172023 @default.
• W2013903917 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2013903917 hasAuthorship W2013903917A5017608012 @default.
• W2013903917 hasAuthorship W2013903917A5052474633 @default.
• W2013903917 hasAuthorship W2013903917A5054591902 @default.
• W2013903917 hasAuthorship W2013903917A5058935905 @default.
• W2013903917 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2013903917 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2013903917 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2013903917 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W2013903917 hasConcept C204243189 @default.
• W2013903917 hasConcept C2777945365 @default.
• W2013903917 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
• W2013903917 hasConcept C2780091579 @default.
• W2013903917 hasConcept C2780227381 @default.
• W2013903917 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2013903917 hasConceptScore W2013903917C126322002 @default.
• W2013903917 hasConceptScore W2013903917C141071460 @default.
• W2013903917 hasConceptScore W2013903917C168563851 @default.
• W2013903917 hasConceptScore W2013903917C188816634 @default.
• W2013903917 hasConceptScore W2013903917C204243189 @default.
• W2013903917 hasConceptScore W2013903917C2777945365 @default.
• W2013903917 hasConceptScore W2013903917C2780047204 @default.
• W2013903917 hasConceptScore W2013903917C2780091579 @default.
• W2013903917 hasConceptScore W2013903917C2780227381 @default.
• W2013903917 hasConceptScore W2013903917C71924100 @default.
• W2013903917 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2013903917 hasLocation W20139039171 @default.
• W2013903917 hasLocation W20139039172 @default.
• W2013903917 hasOpenAccess W2013903917 @default.
• W2013903917 hasPrimaryLocation W20139039171 @default.
• W2013903917 hasRelatedWork W1607368675 @default.
• W2013903917 hasRelatedWork W2041792401 @default.
• W2013903917 hasRelatedWork W2073695670 @default.
• W2013903917 hasRelatedWork W2076864149 @default.
• W2013903917 hasRelatedWork W2077367834 @default.
• W2013903917 hasRelatedWork W2129772752 @default.
• W2013903917 hasRelatedWork W2131019201 @default.
• W2013903917 hasRelatedWork W2151506734 @default.
• W2013903917 hasRelatedWork W2411875310 @default.
• W2013903917 hasRelatedWork W2431919278 @default.
• W2013903917 hasVolume "84" @default.
• W2013903917 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2013903917 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2013903917 magId "2013903917" @default.
• W2013903917 workType "article" @default.