Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2013995309> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 55 of
55
with 100 items per page.
- W2013995309 endingPage "905" @default.
- W2013995309 startingPage "897" @default.
- W2013995309 abstract "Reading and writing book reviews play an important part in academic life, but little is known about how academics carry out these tasks. The aim of this research was to explore these issues with members of the editorial panels of the British Journal of Educational Technology. A questionnaire was used to determine: (1) how often these people read and wrote book reviews in general; (2) how useful they found them; and (3) what features they thought were important in book reviews. Thirty sets of responses were obtained (15 from each sex). Most respondents reported reading between one and five book reviews a month and writing between three and four a year. Overall, there was high agreement in what they thought were the important features of book reviews, but there were also wide individual differences. Men reported that book reviews were more useful than did women. The agreement obtained among the respondents supports the notion that book reviews can be viewed as an academic genre with measurable contents. This has implications for how they are written and how people might be taught to write them better." @default.
- W2013995309 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2013995309 creator A5010279160 @default.
- W2013995309 date "2005-09-01" @default.
- W2013995309 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
- W2013995309 title "Book reviewing in the BJET: a survey of BJET's referees' and writers' views" @default.
- W2013995309 cites W1991435687 @default.
- W2013995309 cites W2035445717 @default.
- W2013995309 cites W2060909962 @default.
- W2013995309 cites W2062402748 @default.
- W2013995309 cites W2151933898 @default.
- W2013995309 cites W2418094347 @default.
- W2013995309 cites W4252534684 @default.
- W2013995309 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00537.x" @default.
- W2013995309 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
- W2013995309 type Work @default.
- W2013995309 sameAs 2013995309 @default.
- W2013995309 citedByCount "9" @default.
- W2013995309 countsByYear W20139953092013 @default.
- W2013995309 countsByYear W20139953092014 @default.
- W2013995309 countsByYear W20139953092015 @default.
- W2013995309 countsByYear W20139953092020 @default.
- W2013995309 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2013995309 hasAuthorship W2013995309A5010279160 @default.
- W2013995309 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2013995309 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2013995309 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
- W2013995309 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W2013995309 hasConcept C554936623 @default.
- W2013995309 hasConceptScore W2013995309C138885662 @default.
- W2013995309 hasConceptScore W2013995309C15744967 @default.
- W2013995309 hasConceptScore W2013995309C19417346 @default.
- W2013995309 hasConceptScore W2013995309C41895202 @default.
- W2013995309 hasConceptScore W2013995309C554936623 @default.
- W2013995309 hasIssue "5" @default.
- W2013995309 hasLocation W20139953091 @default.
- W2013995309 hasOpenAccess W2013995309 @default.
- W2013995309 hasPrimaryLocation W20139953091 @default.
- W2013995309 hasRelatedWork W1151199228 @default.
- W2013995309 hasRelatedWork W1520095837 @default.
- W2013995309 hasRelatedWork W1968776184 @default.
- W2013995309 hasRelatedWork W1971288970 @default.
- W2013995309 hasRelatedWork W2056081136 @default.
- W2013995309 hasRelatedWork W2057096963 @default.
- W2013995309 hasRelatedWork W2285667924 @default.
- W2013995309 hasRelatedWork W2728399104 @default.
- W2013995309 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W2013995309 hasRelatedWork W3002841150 @default.
- W2013995309 hasVolume "36" @default.
- W2013995309 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2013995309 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2013995309 magId "2013995309" @default.
- W2013995309 workType "article" @default.