FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2014005716> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2014005716 endingPage "121708" @default.
• W2014005716 startingPage "121708" @default.
• W2014005716 abstract "Purpose: Monte Carlo track structures (MCTS) simulations have been recognized as useful tools for radiobiological modeling. However, the authors noticed several issues regarding the consistency of reported data. Therefore, in this work, they analyze the impact of various user defined parameters on simulated direct DNA damage yields. In addition, they draw attention to discrepancies in published literature in DNA strand break (SB) yields and selected methodologies. Methods: The MCTS code Geant4-DNA was used to compare radial dose profiles in a nanometer-scale region of interest (ROI) for photon sources of varying sizes and energies. Then, electron tracks of 0.28 keV–220 keV were superimposed on a geometric DNA model composed of 2.7 × 106 nucleosomes, and SBs were simulated according to four definitions based on energy deposits or energy transfers in DNA strand targets compared to a threshold energy ETH. The SB frequencies and complexities in nucleosomes as a function of incident electron energies were obtained. SBs were classified into higher order clusters such as single and double strand breaks (SSBs and DSBs) based on inter-SB distances and on the number of affected strands. Results: Comparisons of different nonuniform dose distributions lacking charged particle equilibrium may lead to erroneous conclusions regarding the effect of energy on relative biological effectiveness. The energy transfer-based SB definitions give similar SB yields as the one based on energy deposit when ETH ≈ 10.79 eV, but deviate significantly for higher ETH values. Between 30 and 40 nucleosomes/Gy show at least one SB in the ROI. The number of nucleosomes that present a complex damage pattern of more than 2 SBs and the degree of complexity of the damage in these nucleosomes diminish as the incident electron energy increases. DNA damage classification into SSB and DSB is highly dependent on the definitions of these higher order structures and their implementations. The authors’ show that, for the four studied models, different yields are expected by up to 54% for SSBs and by up to 32% for DSBs, as a function of the incident electrons energy and of the models being compared. Conclusions: MCTS simulations allow to compare direct DNA damage types and complexities induced by ionizing radiation. However, simulation results depend to a large degree on user-defined parameters, definitions, and algorithms such as: DNA model, dose distribution, SB definition, and the DNA damage clustering algorithm. These interdependencies should be well controlled during the simulations and explicitly reported when comparing results to experiments or calculations." @default.
• W2014005716 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2014005716 creator A5003160405 @default.
• W2014005716 creator A5010597773 @default.
• W2014005716 creator A5013292433 @default.
• W2014005716 creator A5034012305 @default.
• W2014005716 date "2014-11-18" @default.
• W2014005716 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W2014005716 title "On the consistency of Monte Carlo track structure DNA damage simulations" @default.
• W2014005716 cites W1963554507 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W1972359367 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W1992539357 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W1996315957 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W1996678417 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W1996832353 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W1999205993 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2001647856 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2003348387 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2003714891 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2004498595 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2016899512 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2024926642 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2026515265 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2026812997 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2027731662 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2028200888 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2032577340 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2034244445 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2038450079 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2040324680 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2054421322 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2062370238 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2063848554 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2066692912 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W20728212 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2076153629 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2077335595 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2078149643 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2079561200 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2080172907 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2081844303 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2086466939 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2088506968 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2093983303 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2101608919 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2113777563 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2118764067 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2127909948 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2128158076 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2134240599 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2144790975 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2153521378 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2154058296 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2165339852 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2316709185 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W2320495103 @default.
• W2014005716 cites W4321258548 @default.
• W2014005716 doi "https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4901555" @default.
• W2014005716 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25471955" @default.
• W2014005716 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2014005716 type Work @default.
• W2014005716 sameAs 2014005716 @default.
• W2014005716 citedByCount "37" @default.
• W2014005716 countsByYear W20140057162015 @default.
• W2014005716 countsByYear W20140057162016 @default.
• W2014005716 countsByYear W20140057162017 @default.
• W2014005716 countsByYear W20140057162018 @default.
• W2014005716 countsByYear W20140057162019 @default.
• W2014005716 countsByYear W20140057162020 @default.
• W2014005716 countsByYear W20140057162021 @default.
• W2014005716 countsByYear W20140057162022 @default.
• W2014005716 countsByYear W20140057162023 @default.
• W2014005716 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2014005716 hasAuthorship W2014005716A5003160405 @default.
• W2014005716 hasAuthorship W2014005716A5010597773 @default.
• W2014005716 hasAuthorship W2014005716A5013292433 @default.
• W2014005716 hasAuthorship W2014005716A5034012305 @default.
• W2014005716 hasBestOaLocation W20140057162 @default.
• W2014005716 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2014005716 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2014005716 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2014005716 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2014005716 hasConcept C121864883 @default.
• W2014005716 hasConcept C147120987 @default.
• W2014005716 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2014005716 hasConcept C159317903 @default.
• W2014005716 hasConcept C185544564 @default.
• W2014005716 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2014005716 hasConcept C186370098 @default.
• W2014005716 hasConcept C19499675 @default.
• W2014005716 hasConcept C2776436953 @default.
• W2014005716 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2014005716 hasConcept C30475298 @default.
• W2014005716 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2014005716 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2014005716 hasConcept C552990157 @default.
• W2014005716 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2014005716 hasConcept C62520636 @default.

• next