Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2014115979> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 74 of
74
with 100 items per page.
- W2014115979 endingPage "107" @default.
- W2014115979 startingPage "80" @default.
- W2014115979 abstract "The debate over whether economic sanctions “work” is mired in a scholarly limbo. One writer contends that recent international relations scholarship has promoted optimism about the utility of such measures and sets out to challenge this trend,1 while another notes the pessimism that “pervades the sanctions literature” and proceeds to argue that it is unjustiaed.2 A third scholar cites the sanctions literature as an example of fruitless academic debate with little policy relevance.3 Such divergent readings of the scholarly literature are often explained by differences in ideology or fundamentally different theoretical orientations. This does not seem to be the case with respect to the sanctions debate. Under appropriate circumstances, it is quite possible for liberals, neoliberals, realists, neorealists, or globalists to argue in favor of using economic sanctions. If the sanctions debate is bogged down, the explanation does not seem to lie in the essentially contested nature of the subject matter. A second potential explanation is that scholars are talking past one another because they ask different questions, use different concepts, and set the discussion in different analytical contexts. In short, they are talking about different things. This article explores the second explanation. The basic paradox at the heart of the sanctions debate is that policymakers continue to use sanctions with increasing frequency, while scholars continue to deny the utility of such tools of foreign policy.4 Two explanations for this" @default.
- W2014115979 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2014115979 creator A5015010703 @default.
- W2014115979 date "2000-01-01" @default.
- W2014115979 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W2014115979 title "The Sanctions Debate and the Logic of Choice" @default.
- W2014115979 cites W1972993088 @default.
- W2014115979 cites W1977660822 @default.
- W2014115979 cites W2011589335 @default.
- W2014115979 cites W2012844417 @default.
- W2014115979 cites W2017341199 @default.
- W2014115979 cites W2044438593 @default.
- W2014115979 cites W2048595858 @default.
- W2014115979 cites W2051688498 @default.
- W2014115979 cites W2060886834 @default.
- W2014115979 cites W2096085608 @default.
- W2014115979 cites W2109657820 @default.
- W2014115979 cites W2120714576 @default.
- W2014115979 cites W2152667517 @default.
- W2014115979 cites W2159559371 @default.
- W2014115979 cites W2322576119 @default.
- W2014115979 cites W2323028822 @default.
- W2014115979 cites W2378926921 @default.
- W2014115979 cites W4243257357 @default.
- W2014115979 doi "https://doi.org/10.1162/016228899560248" @default.
- W2014115979 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
- W2014115979 type Work @default.
- W2014115979 sameAs 2014115979 @default.
- W2014115979 citedByCount "116" @default.
- W2014115979 countsByYear W20141159792012 @default.
- W2014115979 countsByYear W20141159792013 @default.
- W2014115979 countsByYear W20141159792014 @default.
- W2014115979 countsByYear W20141159792015 @default.
- W2014115979 countsByYear W20141159792016 @default.
- W2014115979 countsByYear W20141159792017 @default.
- W2014115979 countsByYear W20141159792018 @default.
- W2014115979 countsByYear W20141159792019 @default.
- W2014115979 countsByYear W20141159792020 @default.
- W2014115979 countsByYear W20141159792021 @default.
- W2014115979 countsByYear W20141159792022 @default.
- W2014115979 countsByYear W20141159792023 @default.
- W2014115979 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2014115979 hasAuthorship W2014115979A5015010703 @default.
- W2014115979 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W2014115979 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2014115979 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W2014115979 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2014115979 hasConcept C2778069335 @default.
- W2014115979 hasConceptScore W2014115979C162324750 @default.
- W2014115979 hasConceptScore W2014115979C17744445 @default.
- W2014115979 hasConceptScore W2014115979C190253527 @default.
- W2014115979 hasConceptScore W2014115979C199539241 @default.
- W2014115979 hasConceptScore W2014115979C2778069335 @default.
- W2014115979 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2014115979 hasLocation W20141159791 @default.
- W2014115979 hasOpenAccess W2014115979 @default.
- W2014115979 hasPrimaryLocation W20141159791 @default.
- W2014115979 hasRelatedWork W1544155371 @default.
- W2014115979 hasRelatedWork W2028923038 @default.
- W2014115979 hasRelatedWork W2031166585 @default.
- W2014115979 hasRelatedWork W2034858748 @default.
- W2014115979 hasRelatedWork W2319739228 @default.
- W2014115979 hasRelatedWork W2802069141 @default.
- W2014115979 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W2014115979 hasRelatedWork W3198088322 @default.
- W2014115979 hasRelatedWork W4295366847 @default.
- W2014115979 hasRelatedWork W2886266562 @default.
- W2014115979 hasVolume "24" @default.
- W2014115979 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2014115979 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2014115979 magId "2014115979" @default.
- W2014115979 workType "article" @default.