FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2014138317> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2014138317 endingPage "274" @default.
• W2014138317 startingPage "273" @default.
• W2014138317 abstract "Reviewed by: Women, Work, and Clothes in the Eighteenth-Century Novel by Chloe Wigston Smith Sarah Raff Smith, Chloe Wigston. Women, Work, and Clothes in the Eighteenth-Century Novel. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013. 260 pp. $95.00. Chloe Wigston Smith’s Women, Work, and Clothes in the Eighteenth-Century Novel concerns the familiar conceit aligning language with clothing, the idea that verbal “Expression is the Dress of Thought,” as Alexander Pope put it in An Essay on Criticism (1711). Smith traces this analogy between words and garments from Aristotle through the poetry and rhetorical treatises of the eighteenth century, a period when the oft-expressed link between ornaments of rhetoric and apparel became conspicuously more than a metaphor. Not just was “all paper…made from cloth,” so that rag merchants sometimes “turn[ed] stationers,” but clothing and accessories often “incorporated paper into [their] structure” (49). Fabric design appropriated images printed or described in books, and “the textile industry borrowed technological innovations” such as “block printing and copper-plate engraving” from the print industry. Smith’s central contention is that even as the rest of eighteenth-century British culture linked text and textile in ways both rhetorical and material, the novel repudiated this connection, along with the “analog[y] between words and things” that it implied, in an “attempt to reshape the meaning and role of material objects” (37, 17). In the process, the novel’s representations of women working with ordinary, nonluxurious items of clothing, garments whose practicality Smith thinks emphasized their material values rather than their symbolic meaning, succeeded in suggesting “a new and more progressive vision of womanhood” (17). Throughout the book, Smith displays an impressively broad range of reference and expertise. Part I, which details physical and metaphorical connections between clothes and texts, draws as deftly on the history of clothing as it does on the history of rhetoric. Smith juxtaposes her readings of Jonathan Swift’s The Tale of the Tub (1704, 1710), Jane Barker’s A Patchwork Screen for the Ladies (1723), and a number of it-narratives, or stories that track the fortunes of inanimate objects rather than persons, with loving accounts of individual eighteenth-century garments pictured in her book’s illustrations. Here, Smith seems in sympathy with the novel as she describes it: more attentive to the material qualities of the clothes than to their expressive function. Part II explores how the novel’s emphasis on useful, pragmatic garments “entailed a reconsideration of the possibilities of women’s physical labor in the clothing trades” (79). Smith contrasts Samuel Richardson’s servant heroine in Pamela (1740) with invective aired during the Calico Crisis (1719–21), when wool manufacturers condemned domestic servants as “promiscuous shoppers” whose efforts to imitate the dress of their betters and resulting avidity for imported Indian cotton threatened to destroy that embodiment [End Page 273] of “English masculinity and patriotic spirit,” the “domestic wool trade” (111). Smith goes on to compare the pamphlets that Daniel Defoe contributed to this debate with his more open-minded representations of working women in Moll Flanders (1722) and Roxana (1724), novels Smith reads in productive conjunction with testimony from the criminal trials of the Old Bailey court. While Defoe the novelist manages, Smith claims, to “separate stealing from sex,” the trial records between 1714 and 1728 depict female pickpockets who “exploited the sexual desires of male victims by infiltrating their pockets and breeches” (96, 99). A final chapter juxtaposes the unfinished Memoirs (1801) of the actress, author, and fashion maven Mary Robinson with Frances Burney’s last novel The Wanderer; or, Female Difficulties (1814) to show that “needlework, rather than being perceived as a respectable, domestic pursuit, was associated with promiscuity, publicity, and disguise” and consequently “echo[ed] cultural perceptions of the promiscuous professional actress” (143-44, 144). Whether Smith’s arguments about the novel’s resistance to stereotypes yoking feminine labor with feminine sexuality in fact bear on the novel’s alleged rejection of the dressed/expressed analogy and willed “fissure between words and things” (83) may be open to doubt. Smith finds that in the novel, garments ceased being “indices to the mind” and became instead “tools of self-preservation..." @default.
• W2014138317 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2014138317 creator A5010518313 @default.
• W2014138317 date "2014-01-01" @default.
• W2014138317 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2014138317 title "Women, Work, and Clothes in the Eighteenth-Century Novel by Chloe Wigston Smith" @default.
• W2014138317 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/sdn.2014.0051" @default.
• W2014138317 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2014138317 type Work @default.
• W2014138317 sameAs 2014138317 @default.
• W2014138317 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2014138317 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2014138317 hasAuthorship W2014138317A5010518313 @default.
• W2014138317 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2014138317 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W2014138317 hasConcept C1370556 @default.
• W2014138317 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2014138317 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2014138317 hasConcept C164913051 @default.
• W2014138317 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2014138317 hasConcept C192562157 @default.
• W2014138317 hasConcept C27206212 @default.
• W2014138317 hasConcept C2778311575 @default.
• W2014138317 hasConcept C2780876879 @default.
• W2014138317 hasConcept C52119013 @default.
• W2014138317 hasConcept C530175646 @default.
• W2014138317 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2014138317 hasConceptScore W2014138317C111472728 @default.
• W2014138317 hasConceptScore W2014138317C124952713 @default.
• W2014138317 hasConceptScore W2014138317C1370556 @default.
• W2014138317 hasConceptScore W2014138317C138885662 @default.
• W2014138317 hasConceptScore W2014138317C142362112 @default.
• W2014138317 hasConceptScore W2014138317C164913051 @default.
• W2014138317 hasConceptScore W2014138317C166957645 @default.
• W2014138317 hasConceptScore W2014138317C192562157 @default.
• W2014138317 hasConceptScore W2014138317C27206212 @default.
• W2014138317 hasConceptScore W2014138317C2778311575 @default.
• W2014138317 hasConceptScore W2014138317C2780876879 @default.
• W2014138317 hasConceptScore W2014138317C52119013 @default.
• W2014138317 hasConceptScore W2014138317C530175646 @default.
• W2014138317 hasConceptScore W2014138317C95457728 @default.
• W2014138317 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2014138317 hasLocation W20141383171 @default.
• W2014138317 hasOpenAccess W2014138317 @default.
• W2014138317 hasPrimaryLocation W20141383171 @default.
• W2014138317 hasRelatedWork W2032246754 @default.
• W2014138317 hasRelatedWork W2091107323 @default.
• W2014138317 hasRelatedWork W2359932594 @default.
• W2014138317 hasRelatedWork W2383746423 @default.
• W2014138317 hasRelatedWork W2392173317 @default.
• W2014138317 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2014138317 hasRelatedWork W2802019612 @default.
• W2014138317 hasRelatedWork W3210692250 @default.
• W2014138317 hasRelatedWork W4213013387 @default.
• W2014138317 hasRelatedWork W4307368173 @default.
• W2014138317 hasVolume "46" @default.
• W2014138317 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2014138317 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2014138317 magId "2014138317" @default.
• W2014138317 workType "article" @default.