FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W201419> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W201419 abstract "Parties working together on a project usually have different interests in executing that project, but they all aim at achieving project success. This project success has been widely discussed in literature since reaching it is the main goal of each party; but what project success actually is and how it can be determined differs per party. In project success a distinction is made between success criteria, the set of standards by which the measurement of success occurs, and success factors, those aspects that directly or indirectly influence project success. In this research success criteria are studied. Currently there is a lot of literature on project success and also on its criteria, but it only very limitedly relates to the public sector. Which is remarkable since researchers agree that project success is dependent on the perspective taken to look at it: an architect may have a different view on when a project is a success than a contractor. The proposition is that, due to the difference in nature of organization between public and private parties, each uses its own set of success criteria for the judgement of its project success. This research focuses on the public project manager: the operational manager of the public party who is commissioned within his own organisation to carry out the assignment; in this role he represents the ‘client’ to the contracting parties with which he has contact in executing the project. As mentioned project success perception depends on the perspective taken to judge it; and if there is indeed a different success perception for a public party than for a private party this discrepancy will become most clear at the operational level, where they work in close contact. This research aims at closing the now existing knowledge gap and identifying the success criteria relevant for the public project manager. By means of Q-methodology, a method used for studying subjectivity, the view on project success of 28 interviewed public project managers was assembled and analysed. The first step in using this method was to determine the Q-sample: the complete list of criteria relevant for the public project manager. To determine the public project manager’s view on success the 28 managers were asked to rank these criteria in relation to their importance in determining project success. This list of relevant criteria was formulated through studying literature and executing five test interviews; firstly 25 criteria were distinguished of which the representativeness for the public sector was checked. Eventually a number of criteria were combined, a number of criteria was left out due to lack of relevance for public project managers and a few other criteria were added, leading to a final list consisting of 19 criteria. In determining this Q-sample, two important conclusions were drawn. Firstly, since literature focuses mainly on the private sector, many criteria are too commercially oriented to reflect the public organisation’s nature; in these cases the public equivalent of the private sector criterion is determined. Secondly, a number of criteria presumed to be relevant for public sector success determination are not found in literature. These new criteria were added to the Q-sample and their relevance can be determined after the research has been conducted." @default.
• W201419 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W201419 creator A5057596443 @default.
• W201419 date "2013-03-22" @default.
• W201419 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W201419 title "Public project manager's perspective on project success: A research into the success determination of construction projects by project managers of the public party" @default.
• W201419 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W201419 type Work @default.
• W201419 sameAs 201419 @default.
• W201419 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W201419 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W201419 hasAuthorship W201419A5057596443 @default.
• W201419 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W201419 hasConcept C118846928 @default.
• W201419 hasConcept C12713177 @default.
• W201419 hasConcept C140423589 @default.
• W201419 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W201419 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W201419 hasConcept C15952604 @default.
• W201419 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W201419 hasConcept C168074093 @default.
• W201419 hasConcept C177264268 @default.
• W201419 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W201419 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W201419 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W201419 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W201419 hasConcept C2776548248 @default.
• W201419 hasConcept C2780612406 @default.
• W201419 hasConcept C39389867 @default.
• W201419 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W201419 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W201419 hasConcept C58223718 @default.
• W201419 hasConcept C58565012 @default.
• W201419 hasConcept C84307487 @default.
• W201419 hasConceptScore W201419C10138342 @default.
• W201419 hasConceptScore W201419C118846928 @default.
• W201419 hasConceptScore W201419C12713177 @default.
• W201419 hasConceptScore W201419C140423589 @default.
• W201419 hasConceptScore W201419C144133560 @default.
• W201419 hasConceptScore W201419C154945302 @default.
• W201419 hasConceptScore W201419C15952604 @default.
• W201419 hasConceptScore W201419C162324750 @default.
• W201419 hasConceptScore W201419C168074093 @default.
• W201419 hasConceptScore W201419C177264268 @default.
• W201419 hasConceptScore W201419C17744445 @default.
• W201419 hasConceptScore W201419C187736073 @default.
• W201419 hasConceptScore W201419C199360897 @default.
• W201419 hasConceptScore W201419C199539241 @default.
• W201419 hasConceptScore W201419C2776548248 @default.
• W201419 hasConceptScore W201419C2780612406 @default.
• W201419 hasConceptScore W201419C39389867 @default.
• W201419 hasConceptScore W201419C39549134 @default.
• W201419 hasConceptScore W201419C41008148 @default.
• W201419 hasConceptScore W201419C58223718 @default.
• W201419 hasConceptScore W201419C58565012 @default.
• W201419 hasConceptScore W201419C84307487 @default.
• W201419 hasLocation W2014191 @default.
• W201419 hasOpenAccess W201419 @default.
• W201419 hasPrimaryLocation W2014191 @default.
• W201419 hasRelatedWork W103844057 @default.
• W201419 hasRelatedWork W123009368 @default.
• W201419 hasRelatedWork W143520288 @default.
• W201419 hasRelatedWork W1519729158 @default.
• W201419 hasRelatedWork W2012122738 @default.
• W201419 hasRelatedWork W2025971250 @default.
• W201419 hasRelatedWork W2028993500 @default.
• W201419 hasRelatedWork W2187800873 @default.
• W201419 hasRelatedWork W231173040 @default.
• W201419 hasRelatedWork W2367504386 @default.
• W201419 hasRelatedWork W2382209313 @default.
• W201419 hasRelatedWork W2395643486 @default.
• W201419 hasRelatedWork W245259547 @default.
• W201419 hasRelatedWork W2501096428 @default.
• W201419 hasRelatedWork W2529788904 @default.
• W201419 hasRelatedWork W2591849737 @default.
• W201419 hasRelatedWork W3212512323 @default.
• W201419 hasRelatedWork W327666511 @default.
• W201419 hasRelatedWork W68243422 @default.
• W201419 hasRelatedWork W640342849 @default.
• W201419 isParatext "false" @default.
• W201419 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W201419 magId "201419" @default.
• W201419 workType "article" @default.