FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2014199061> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2014199061 endingPage "833" @default.
• W2014199061 startingPage "829" @default.
• W2014199061 abstract "To describe and compare health outcomes two years after medical abortion or vacuum aspiration in women recruited into a patient preference trial during 1990 to 1991.Women recruited to the original, partially randomised study were contacted for assessment using a structured interview.Grampian region of Scotland, UK.One hundred and forty women who had participated in a partially randomised study of first trimester abortion two years previously.Vacuum aspiration or medical abortion using mifepristone and gemeprost.Long-term general, reproductive and psychological health; acceptability of procedure; perceived value of choice of method of termination.There were no significant differences between women who had undergone medical abortion or vacuum aspiration two years previously in general, reproductive or psychological health. Almost all women placed a high value on the provision of choice of method of termination. There was a significant difference in perception of long term procedure acceptability among women who had been randomised to a method of termination.Women should have the opportunity to choose the method of termination. This opportunity will result in high levels of acceptability, particularly at gestations under 50 days of amenorrhoea.In a comparative study conducted during 1990-91, 363 Scottish women with pregnancies of less than 64 days of gestation were given the option of selecting medical abortion with mifepristone/gemeprost or surgical vacuum aspiration abortion; those without a preference were randomly assigned to a method. There were no differences between groups in efficacy or medical complications at the 21-day postabortion follow-up. Medical abortion was associated with significantly more pain during the procedure, but not following hospital discharge, and its efficacy decreased with advancing gestation. At a median time interval of 26 months after the abortion, 140 women from the original cohort were reinterviewed to assess long-term acceptability. There were no significant differences between the medical and surgical abortion groups at long-term follow-up in their assessment of their current health status, the nature and incidence of subsequent morbidity requiring a doctor's care, consultations for psychiatric problems, or menstrual disorders. 9% of women who opted for surgical abortion and 11% who chose medical abortion indicated they would select a different method in the future. Vacuum aspiration remained significantly more acceptable than medical abortion among women who were randomly allocated to an abortion group. 97 women (69%) rated the opportunity to choose an abortion method as highly important, and 86-90% indicated a willingness to pay for the provision of such choice." @default.
• W2014199061 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2014199061 creator A5019277685 @default.
• W2014199061 creator A5025442309 @default.
• W2014199061 creator A5029957018 @default.
• W2014199061 creator A5039544024 @default.
• W2014199061 creator A5059552227 @default.
• W2014199061 date "1997-07-01" @default.
• W2014199061 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
• W2014199061 title "Medical abortion or vacuum aspiration? Two year follow up of a patient preference trial" @default.
• W2014199061 cites W1514665577 @default.
• W2014199061 cites W1539610526 @default.
• W2014199061 cites W1807943423 @default.
• W2014199061 cites W1927934106 @default.
• W2014199061 cites W1954410364 @default.
• W2014199061 cites W1984752921 @default.
• W2014199061 cites W1985213624 @default.
• W2014199061 cites W1992688380 @default.
• W2014199061 cites W1995633792 @default.
• W2014199061 cites W1998884854 @default.
• W2014199061 cites W2000139275 @default.
• W2014199061 cites W2033888789 @default.
• W2014199061 cites W2050143859 @default.
• W2014199061 cites W2058648792 @default.
• W2014199061 cites W2071487569 @default.
• W2014199061 cites W2078717615 @default.
• W2014199061 cites W2085195278 @default.
• W2014199061 cites W2098578793 @default.
• W2014199061 cites W2150727191 @default.
• W2014199061 cites W2166214874 @default.
• W2014199061 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb12028.x" @default.
• W2014199061 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9236649" @default.
• W2014199061 hasPublicationYear "1997" @default.
• W2014199061 type Work @default.
• W2014199061 sameAs 2014199061 @default.
• W2014199061 citedByCount "95" @default.
• W2014199061 countsByYear W20141990612012 @default.
• W2014199061 countsByYear W20141990612014 @default.
• W2014199061 countsByYear W20141990612015 @default.
• W2014199061 countsByYear W20141990612016 @default.
• W2014199061 countsByYear W20141990612017 @default.
• W2014199061 countsByYear W20141990612018 @default.
• W2014199061 countsByYear W20141990612019 @default.
• W2014199061 countsByYear W20141990612020 @default.
• W2014199061 countsByYear W20141990612021 @default.
• W2014199061 countsByYear W20141990612023 @default.
• W2014199061 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2014199061 hasAuthorship W2014199061A5019277685 @default.
• W2014199061 hasAuthorship W2014199061A5025442309 @default.
• W2014199061 hasAuthorship W2014199061A5029957018 @default.
• W2014199061 hasAuthorship W2014199061A5039544024 @default.
• W2014199061 hasAuthorship W2014199061A5059552227 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConcept C121752807 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConcept C2777914877 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConcept C2778079182 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConcept C2778642596 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConcept C2778826759 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConcept C2779076696 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConcept C2779199973 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConcept C2779560327 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConcept C2986817661 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConceptScore W2014199061C121752807 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConceptScore W2014199061C131872663 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConceptScore W2014199061C141071460 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConceptScore W2014199061C168563851 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConceptScore W2014199061C2777914877 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConceptScore W2014199061C2778079182 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConceptScore W2014199061C2778642596 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConceptScore W2014199061C2778826759 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConceptScore W2014199061C2779076696 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConceptScore W2014199061C2779199973 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConceptScore W2014199061C2779234561 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConceptScore W2014199061C2779560327 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConceptScore W2014199061C2908647359 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConceptScore W2014199061C29456083 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConceptScore W2014199061C2986817661 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConceptScore W2014199061C54355233 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConceptScore W2014199061C71924100 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConceptScore W2014199061C86803240 @default.
• W2014199061 hasConceptScore W2014199061C99454951 @default.
• W2014199061 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W2014199061 hasLocation W20141990611 @default.
• W2014199061 hasLocation W20141990612 @default.
• W2014199061 hasOpenAccess W2014199061 @default.
• W2014199061 hasPrimaryLocation W20141990611 @default.
• W2014199061 hasRelatedWork W2010762356 @default.
• W2014199061 hasRelatedWork W2029521764 @default.
• W2014199061 hasRelatedWork W2061051450 @default.

• next