FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2014244736> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2014244736 endingPage "311" @default.
• W2014244736 startingPage "306" @default.
• W2014244736 abstract "Objectives (a) to assess the accuracy of self‐reported smoking status in pregnant women from rural and small metropolitan statistical areas who stated they were smokers at the onset of pregnancy, (b) to compare the characteristics of these women who self‐reported a nonsmoker status at the first prenatal visit with those who reported a smoker status, and (c) to determine the characteristics that predict self‐reported smoking status and positive/negative urinary cotinine assays. Setting Seven private obstetric offices serving rural and small metropolitan statistical areas in upstate New York. Participants A convenience sample of 94 pregnant women who stated they were smokers at the onset of their pregnancies. Their mean age was 23 years and mean level of education was 11.9 years; 95% were White, 65% were single, and 65% were Medicaid‐funded. Design Descriptive correlational design. At the first prenatal visit, the sensitivity and specificity of smoking and nonsmoking status were determined by comparing self‐reports of smoking status with urinary cotinine assays. Data were also analyzed for relationships among demographic variables and for predictors of smoking status and urinary cotinine. Results The discordance rate between self‐reports of smoking status and urinary cotinine assays at the first prenatal visit for the total sample was 16.6%, significant at p < .001, chi‐square = 27.80, df= 1. Based on biochemical assays of > 200 ng/ml of cotinine indicating active smoking, 34.7% of women who denied smoking (specificity of 65.3%) and 10.4% of women who stated that they smoked (sensitivity of 89.5%) inaccurately reported their status (significant at p < .001). The number of cigarettes smoked per day was positively correlated with age, gravidity, parity, and number of smokers in the household. Gravidity and the number of smokers in the household were significant predictors of positive self‐report of smoking status and of positive urinary cotinine assay. Conclusion These results substantiate the unreliability of self‐report on smoking status in the pregnant population and in women who are recent quitters. Such findings have implications for clinical practice, such as (a) changes are necessary in how the prenatal interview assesses past and present tobacco use, (b) pregnant smokers who are multigravidae and who live with other smokers need more tailored interventions, and (c) more research is needed on how self‐report can be ethically and efficiently validated. (a) to assess the accuracy of self‐reported smoking status in pregnant women from rural and small metropolitan statistical areas who stated they were smokers at the onset of pregnancy, (b) to compare the characteristics of these women who self‐reported a nonsmoker status at the first prenatal visit with those who reported a smoker status, and (c) to determine the characteristics that predict self‐reported smoking status and positive/negative urinary cotinine assays. Seven private obstetric offices serving rural and small metropolitan statistical areas in upstate New York. A convenience sample of 94 pregnant women who stated they were smokers at the onset of their pregnancies. Their mean age was 23 years and mean level of education was 11.9 years; 95% were White, 65% were single, and 65% were Medicaid‐funded. Descriptive correlational design. At the first prenatal visit, the sensitivity and specificity of smoking and nonsmoking status were determined by comparing self‐reports of smoking status with urinary cotinine assays. Data were also analyzed for relationships among demographic variables and for predictors of smoking status and urinary cotinine. The discordance rate between self‐reports of smoking status and urinary cotinine assays at the first prenatal visit for the total sample was 16.6%, significant at p < .001, chi‐square = 27.80, df= 1. Based on biochemical assays of > 200 ng/ml of cotinine indicating active smoking, 34.7% of women who denied smoking (specificity of 65.3%) and 10.4% of women who stated that they smoked (sensitivity of 89.5%) inaccurately reported their status (significant at p < .001). The number of cigarettes smoked per day was positively correlated with age, gravidity, parity, and number of smokers in the household. Gravidity and the number of smokers in the household were significant predictors of positive self‐report of smoking status and of positive urinary cotinine assay. These results substantiate the unreliability of self‐report on smoking status in the pregnant population and in women who are recent quitters. Such findings have implications for clinical practice, such as (a) changes are necessary in how the prenatal interview assesses past and present tobacco use, (b) pregnant smokers who are multigravidae and who live with other smokers need more tailored interventions, and (c) more research is needed on how self‐report can be ethically and efficiently validated." @default.
• W2014244736 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2014244736 creator A5021288210 @default.
• W2014244736 creator A5046624306 @default.
• W2014244736 creator A5055828493 @default.
• W2014244736 creator A5070315838 @default.
• W2014244736 date "2004-05-01" @default.
• W2014244736 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2014244736 title "Comparison of Self‐Reported Smoking and Urinary Cotinine Levels in a Rural Pregnant Population" @default.
• W2014244736 cites W1479710456 @default.
• W2014244736 cites W2000395133 @default.
• W2014244736 cites W2022656344 @default.
• W2014244736 cites W2057937557 @default.
• W2014244736 cites W2063642024 @default.
• W2014244736 cites W2072573533 @default.
• W2014244736 cites W2076655174 @default.
• W2014244736 cites W2085191348 @default.
• W2014244736 cites W2095848880 @default.
• W2014244736 cites W2120903648 @default.
• W2014244736 cites W2141822424 @default.
• W2014244736 cites W2146843504 @default.
• W2014244736 cites W2158313887 @default.
• W2014244736 cites W2419320272 @default.
• W2014244736 cites W31336746 @default.
• W2014244736 cites W2122801742 @default.
• W2014244736 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/0884217504264866" @default.
• W2014244736 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15180193" @default.
• W2014244736 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W2014244736 type Work @default.
• W2014244736 sameAs 2014244736 @default.
• W2014244736 citedByCount "82" @default.
• W2014244736 countsByYear W20142447362012 @default.
• W2014244736 countsByYear W20142447362013 @default.
• W2014244736 countsByYear W20142447362014 @default.
• W2014244736 countsByYear W20142447362015 @default.
• W2014244736 countsByYear W20142447362016 @default.
• W2014244736 countsByYear W20142447362017 @default.
• W2014244736 countsByYear W20142447362018 @default.
• W2014244736 countsByYear W20142447362020 @default.
• W2014244736 countsByYear W20142447362021 @default.
• W2014244736 countsByYear W20142447362022 @default.
• W2014244736 countsByYear W20142447362023 @default.
• W2014244736 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2014244736 hasAuthorship W2014244736A5021288210 @default.
• W2014244736 hasAuthorship W2014244736A5046624306 @default.
• W2014244736 hasAuthorship W2014244736A5055828493 @default.
• W2014244736 hasAuthorship W2014244736A5070315838 @default.
• W2014244736 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2014244736 hasConcept C129047720 @default.
• W2014244736 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W2014244736 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2014244736 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2014244736 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2014244736 hasConcept C158739034 @default.
• W2014244736 hasConcept C2776319443 @default.
• W2014244736 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W2014244736 hasConcept C2779547902 @default.
• W2014244736 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2014244736 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2014244736 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2014244736 hasConcept C77411442 @default.
• W2014244736 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2014244736 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2014244736 hasConceptScore W2014244736C126322002 @default.
• W2014244736 hasConceptScore W2014244736C129047720 @default.
• W2014244736 hasConceptScore W2014244736C131872663 @default.
• W2014244736 hasConceptScore W2014244736C142724271 @default.
• W2014244736 hasConceptScore W2014244736C144024400 @default.
• W2014244736 hasConceptScore W2014244736C149923435 @default.
• W2014244736 hasConceptScore W2014244736C158739034 @default.
• W2014244736 hasConceptScore W2014244736C2776319443 @default.
• W2014244736 hasConceptScore W2014244736C2779234561 @default.
• W2014244736 hasConceptScore W2014244736C2779547902 @default.
• W2014244736 hasConceptScore W2014244736C2908647359 @default.
• W2014244736 hasConceptScore W2014244736C54355233 @default.
• W2014244736 hasConceptScore W2014244736C71924100 @default.
• W2014244736 hasConceptScore W2014244736C77411442 @default.
• W2014244736 hasConceptScore W2014244736C86803240 @default.
• W2014244736 hasConceptScore W2014244736C99454951 @default.
• W2014244736 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2014244736 hasLocation W20142447361 @default.
• W2014244736 hasLocation W20142447362 @default.
• W2014244736 hasOpenAccess W2014244736 @default.
• W2014244736 hasPrimaryLocation W20142447361 @default.
• W2014244736 hasRelatedWork W1964299053 @default.
• W2014244736 hasRelatedWork W1973526156 @default.
• W2014244736 hasRelatedWork W2008748104 @default.
• W2014244736 hasRelatedWork W2044302825 @default.
• W2014244736 hasRelatedWork W2078936977 @default.
• W2014244736 hasRelatedWork W2151555288 @default.
• W2014244736 hasRelatedWork W2168788155 @default.
• W2014244736 hasRelatedWork W3000870447 @default.
• W2014244736 hasRelatedWork W4386274793 @default.
• W2014244736 hasRelatedWork W2154563286 @default.
• W2014244736 hasVolume "33" @default.
• W2014244736 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2014244736 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2014244736 magId "2014244736" @default.

• next