Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2014260089> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 74 of
74
with 100 items per page.
- W2014260089 endingPage "518" @default.
- W2014260089 startingPage "518" @default.
- W2014260089 abstract "Purpose: There are significant differences between pencil beam and convolution algorithms when used in the thorax. However, these differences have not been previously directly correlated with lung SBRT outcomes. Methods: Data from 237 patients treated with SBRT for NSCLC or metastatic disease from other sites were retrospectively analyzed. Of those, 138 were planned using Brainlab treatment planning software (TPS) with the pencil beam (PB) algorithm and treated on Novalis with fiducial marker-based, dual planar radiograph image guidance. Ninety-nine were planned using Pinnacle TPS with collapsed cone convolution (CCC) algorithm (considered a more accurate model) and treated on Varian linacs with CBCT image guidance. Target delineation/expansion guidelines, nominal prescription values, and dose restrictions were identical between the two groups. Median follow-up was 28 and 17 months for the PB and CCC groups, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to determine the statistical differences in local/marginal control between the two groups. Forty-nine plans done in Brainlab (24 with and 25 without local recurrence) were reproduced in Pinnacle with the same MUs. D99 (PTV, GITV), V90 (PTV, GITV), D95 (PTV) and the isocenter dose (D_ISO) were compared. Results: Twenty-seven patients (19.6%) planned with the PB and 5 patients (5.1%) planned with the CCC algorithms developed local recurrence. Mantel-Cox and Wilcoxon tests show significant differences between the two groups (P< 0.02). Differences between the two algorithms for target coverage were: D99_GITV=13.9%, D99_PTV=20.8%, V90_GITV=13.7%, V90_PTV=37.5%, D95_PTV=18.9% and D_ISO=6%. Conclusion: The outcome differences between the patients planned with the PB vs CCC algorithms were statistically significant. Even after controlling for potential variables between the two groups, there appears to be a loss of local control when the delivered dose is about 20% lower than the prescription. Conversely, potential benefit with dose escalation cannot be excluded." @default.
- W2014260089 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2014260089 creator A5025793378 @default.
- W2014260089 creator A5047495544 @default.
- W2014260089 creator A5055888843 @default.
- W2014260089 creator A5056175541 @default.
- W2014260089 creator A5065959120 @default.
- W2014260089 creator A5081171410 @default.
- W2014260089 creator A5089476321 @default.
- W2014260089 creator A5090807936 @default.
- W2014260089 date "2013-06-01" @default.
- W2014260089 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W2014260089 title "TH-A-137-07: Local Control Differences for SBRT Lung Patients Planned with Pencil Beam Vs. Collapsed Cone Convolution Algorithms" @default.
- W2014260089 doi "https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4815689" @default.
- W2014260089 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
- W2014260089 type Work @default.
- W2014260089 sameAs 2014260089 @default.
- W2014260089 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2014260089 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2014260089 hasAuthorship W2014260089A5025793378 @default.
- W2014260089 hasAuthorship W2014260089A5047495544 @default.
- W2014260089 hasAuthorship W2014260089A5055888843 @default.
- W2014260089 hasAuthorship W2014260089A5056175541 @default.
- W2014260089 hasAuthorship W2014260089A5065959120 @default.
- W2014260089 hasAuthorship W2014260089A5081171410 @default.
- W2014260089 hasAuthorship W2014260089A5089476321 @default.
- W2014260089 hasAuthorship W2014260089A5090807936 @default.
- W2014260089 hasConcept C104293457 @default.
- W2014260089 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
- W2014260089 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W2014260089 hasConcept C181401712 @default.
- W2014260089 hasConcept C201645570 @default.
- W2014260089 hasConcept C2776017024 @default.
- W2014260089 hasConcept C2779813781 @default.
- W2014260089 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
- W2014260089 hasConcept C3018399558 @default.
- W2014260089 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W2014260089 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
- W2014260089 hasConcept C544519230 @default.
- W2014260089 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2014260089 hasConceptScore W2014260089C104293457 @default.
- W2014260089 hasConceptScore W2014260089C11413529 @default.
- W2014260089 hasConceptScore W2014260089C126838900 @default.
- W2014260089 hasConceptScore W2014260089C181401712 @default.
- W2014260089 hasConceptScore W2014260089C201645570 @default.
- W2014260089 hasConceptScore W2014260089C2776017024 @default.
- W2014260089 hasConceptScore W2014260089C2779813781 @default.
- W2014260089 hasConceptScore W2014260089C2989005 @default.
- W2014260089 hasConceptScore W2014260089C3018399558 @default.
- W2014260089 hasConceptScore W2014260089C33923547 @default.
- W2014260089 hasConceptScore W2014260089C509974204 @default.
- W2014260089 hasConceptScore W2014260089C544519230 @default.
- W2014260089 hasConceptScore W2014260089C71924100 @default.
- W2014260089 hasIssue "6Part31" @default.
- W2014260089 hasLocation W20142600891 @default.
- W2014260089 hasOpenAccess W2014260089 @default.
- W2014260089 hasPrimaryLocation W20142600891 @default.
- W2014260089 hasRelatedWork W1994784948 @default.
- W2014260089 hasRelatedWork W2011562588 @default.
- W2014260089 hasRelatedWork W2041810761 @default.
- W2014260089 hasRelatedWork W2044950871 @default.
- W2014260089 hasRelatedWork W2055381489 @default.
- W2014260089 hasRelatedWork W2073671715 @default.
- W2014260089 hasRelatedWork W2094588507 @default.
- W2014260089 hasRelatedWork W2360742628 @default.
- W2014260089 hasRelatedWork W3030391754 @default.
- W2014260089 hasRelatedWork W3031306062 @default.
- W2014260089 hasVolume "40" @default.
- W2014260089 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2014260089 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2014260089 magId "2014260089" @default.
- W2014260089 workType "article" @default.