Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2014310850> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2014310850 abstract "Despite the prominence of hip fractures in orthopedic trauma, the assessment of fracture healing using radiographs remains subjective. The variability in the assessment of fracture healing has important implications for both clinical research and patient care. With little existing literature regarding reliable consensus on hip fracture healing, this study was conducted to determine inter-rater reliability between orthopedic surgeons and radiologists on healing assessments using sequential radiographs in patients with hip fractures. Secondary objectives included evaluating a checklist designed to assess hip fracture healing and determining whether agreement improved when reviewers were aware of the timing of the x-rays in relation to the patients’ surgery. A panel of six reviewers (three orthopedic surgeons and three radiologists) independently assessed fracture healing using sequential radiographs from 100 patients with femoral neck fractures and 100 patients with intertrochanteric fractures. During their independent review they also completed a previously developed radiographic checklist (Radiographic Union Score for Hip (RUSH)). Inter and intra-rater reliability scores were calculated. Data from the current study was compared to the findings from a previously conducted study where the same reviewers, unaware of the timing of the x-rays, completed the RUSH score. The agreement between surgeons and radiologists for fracture healing was moderate for “general impression of fracture healing” in both femoral neck (ICC = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.42-0.71) and intertrochanteric fractures (0.50, 95% CI: 0.33-0.62). Using a standardized checklist (RUSH), agreement was almost perfect in both femoral neck (ICC = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.82-0.87) and intertrochanteric fractures (0.88, 95% CI: 0.86-0.90). We also found a high degree of correlation between healing and the total RUSH score using a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis, there was an area under the curve of 0.993 for femoral neck cases and 0.989 for intertrochanteric cases. Agreement within the radiologist group and within the surgeon group did not significantly differ in our analyses. In all cases, radiographs in which the time from surgery was known resulted in higher agreement scores compared to those from the previous study in which reviewers were unaware of the time the radiograph was obtained. Agreement in hip fracture radiographic healing may be improved with the use of a standardized checklist and appears highly influenced by the timing of the radiograph. These findings should be considered when evaluating patient outcomes and in clinical studies involving patients with hip fractures. Future research initiatives are required to further evaluate the RUSH checklist." @default.
- W2014310850 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2014310850 creator A5008286862 @default.
- W2014310850 creator A5018445804 @default.
- W2014310850 creator A5022106962 @default.
- W2014310850 creator A5032222092 @default.
- W2014310850 creator A5048125439 @default.
- W2014310850 creator A5048426258 @default.
- W2014310850 creator A5049560403 @default.
- W2014310850 creator A5053098824 @default.
- W2014310850 creator A5078425353 @default.
- W2014310850 creator A5088336917 @default.
- W2014310850 date "2013-02-25" @default.
- W2014310850 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W2014310850 title "Radiographic union score for hip substantially improves agreement between surgeons and radiologists" @default.
- W2014310850 cites W1551563246 @default.
- W2014310850 cites W1970001479 @default.
- W2014310850 cites W1976676319 @default.
- W2014310850 cites W1981384212 @default.
- W2014310850 cites W2004809027 @default.
- W2014310850 cites W2016662879 @default.
- W2014310850 cites W2023166624 @default.
- W2014310850 cites W2024560451 @default.
- W2014310850 cites W2024615521 @default.
- W2014310850 cites W2027371013 @default.
- W2014310850 cites W2030426686 @default.
- W2014310850 cites W2033189103 @default.
- W2014310850 cites W2057961879 @default.
- W2014310850 cites W2061935692 @default.
- W2014310850 cites W2076306998 @default.
- W2014310850 cites W2077256235 @default.
- W2014310850 cites W2091308199 @default.
- W2014310850 cites W2109829775 @default.
- W2014310850 cites W2122909334 @default.
- W2014310850 cites W2131267898 @default.
- W2014310850 cites W2133706509 @default.
- W2014310850 cites W2145664970 @default.
- W2014310850 cites W2149926677 @default.
- W2014310850 cites W2164777277 @default.
- W2014310850 cites W2340075021 @default.
- W2014310850 cites W2984427312 @default.
- W2014310850 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-70" @default.
- W2014310850 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3599458" @default.
- W2014310850 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23442540" @default.
- W2014310850 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
- W2014310850 type Work @default.
- W2014310850 sameAs 2014310850 @default.
- W2014310850 citedByCount "50" @default.
- W2014310850 countsByYear W20143108502014 @default.
- W2014310850 countsByYear W20143108502015 @default.
- W2014310850 countsByYear W20143108502016 @default.
- W2014310850 countsByYear W20143108502017 @default.
- W2014310850 countsByYear W20143108502018 @default.
- W2014310850 countsByYear W20143108502019 @default.
- W2014310850 countsByYear W20143108502020 @default.
- W2014310850 countsByYear W20143108502021 @default.
- W2014310850 countsByYear W20143108502022 @default.
- W2014310850 countsByYear W20143108502023 @default.
- W2014310850 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2014310850 hasAuthorship W2014310850A5008286862 @default.
- W2014310850 hasAuthorship W2014310850A5018445804 @default.
- W2014310850 hasAuthorship W2014310850A5022106962 @default.
- W2014310850 hasAuthorship W2014310850A5032222092 @default.
- W2014310850 hasAuthorship W2014310850A5048125439 @default.
- W2014310850 hasAuthorship W2014310850A5048426258 @default.
- W2014310850 hasAuthorship W2014310850A5049560403 @default.
- W2014310850 hasAuthorship W2014310850A5053098824 @default.
- W2014310850 hasAuthorship W2014310850A5078425353 @default.
- W2014310850 hasAuthorship W2014310850A5088336917 @default.
- W2014310850 hasBestOaLocation W20143108501 @default.
- W2014310850 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2014310850 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2014310850 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2014310850 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
- W2014310850 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
- W2014310850 hasConcept C2775854910 @default.
- W2014310850 hasConcept C2776541429 @default.
- W2014310850 hasConcept C2778885795 @default.
- W2014310850 hasConcept C2779356329 @default.
- W2014310850 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
- W2014310850 hasConcept C43893838 @default.
- W2014310850 hasConcept C68312169 @default.
- W2014310850 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2014310850 hasConcept C8337478 @default.
- W2014310850 hasConceptScore W2014310850C126322002 @default.
- W2014310850 hasConceptScore W2014310850C141071460 @default.
- W2014310850 hasConceptScore W2014310850C15744967 @default.
- W2014310850 hasConceptScore W2014310850C180747234 @default.
- W2014310850 hasConceptScore W2014310850C1862650 @default.
- W2014310850 hasConceptScore W2014310850C2775854910 @default.
- W2014310850 hasConceptScore W2014310850C2776541429 @default.
- W2014310850 hasConceptScore W2014310850C2778885795 @default.
- W2014310850 hasConceptScore W2014310850C2779356329 @default.
- W2014310850 hasConceptScore W2014310850C36454342 @default.
- W2014310850 hasConceptScore W2014310850C43893838 @default.
- W2014310850 hasConceptScore W2014310850C68312169 @default.
- W2014310850 hasConceptScore W2014310850C71924100 @default.
- W2014310850 hasConceptScore W2014310850C8337478 @default.
- W2014310850 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W2014310850 hasLocation W20143108501 @default.