FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2014371147> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2014371147 endingPage "210" @default.
• W2014371147 startingPage "205" @default.
• W2014371147 abstract "How Fool Is a Holy Fool? Agneta Schreurs (bio) The editors asked me to write a short response to your commentaries. They asked me to do that as a set; therefore, I respond to your texts as a whole. First, I thank you for your comments. I appreciate very much that you took the time to read and reflect on my article. I am really very happy with your positive evaluation of my article, particularly because my choice for this subject has much to do with my own biography. I have been raised by nonreligious parents and grandparents. My mother being a classical scholar and my father a scientist, I knew more about antiquity and chemistry than about the Bible, which in fact did not figure at all in my education. However, when I was forty years old, I took on theology at the University of Utrecht as an extra study in my free time, mainly because I felt embarrassed whenever my students or clients brought the subject up and I did not know the first thing about it. Right from the beginning I became absolutely excited about this study, not only about the broad range of fascinating subjects, but also because quite a number churches had merged the academic part of their seminaries with the theological faculty of the University of Utrecht into an academically very high-standard curriculum. Students and teachers were a mix of Dutch Reformed, Roman Catholic, Old Catholic, Baptist, and several other denominations, in my time even a Jewish rabbi and a Winti (an indigenous religion in the former Dutch West Indies). Outsider as I was, this offered me a unique opportunity to become acquainted in a personal and natural way with their various faiths. Nevertheless, it took me three years before I realized what all those fascinating things had to do with my life and with my work! This realization was the reason why, after getting my master's degree in theology, I decided to choose a combination of philosophy of religion and psychology of religion for my doctoral dissertation and to change my group practice into work that explicitly dealt with the interconnections between spirituality and psychotherapy. I also want to thank you for sharing your thoughts on the larger contexts of my subject. From my biographical sketch, you can see that I agree with both of you in that it is high time that psychiatry and psychotherapy pay more attention to—and become more knowledgeable about—their religious patients' religion and spirituality. Not because I think the talking cures may have much in common with faith healing (in fact, I agree with Gibson [2000] that they have much more in common with the gentle craft of taking confession), but because it is unprofessional not to do so. When a person consults a priest or minister with regard to a religious problem, it often appears that there are also psychological problems involved. That is why theological curricula include pastoral psychology and clinical training courses. This is also true the other way round: psychological problems treated in psychotherapy and counseling may involve a patient's religious mindset. However [End Page 205] , most psychotherapists are generally neither religious themselves nor trained in assessing and understanding the great variety of ways in which people may be religious and how these may be intertwined with the problems for which they have sought therapeutic help. In particular, they are mostly not trained in discovering how their patients' religiousness may be a cause of therapeutic failure or, alternatively, a source of support and as such a help toward therapeutic progress. In addition to such lack in information and training, and in contrast with most clergy, clients in therapy may easily have very different religious backgrounds. As a result of this professional situation, many psychotherapists feel uncomfortable in this area and unprofessionally tend to ignore, avoid, or reinterpret in psychological terms their patients' spiritual expressions. The point I tried to make is this: to successfully discover and assess how a patients' religiousness may be a cause of psychological problems or conversely, be a source of support and as such a help toward therapeutic progress, you need at least some basic..." @default.
• W2014371147 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2014371147 creator A5002677170 @default.
• W2014371147 date "2007-01-01" @default.
• W2014371147 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2014371147 title "How Fool Is a "Holy Fool"?" @default.
• W2014371147 cites W118839280 @default.
• W2014371147 cites W1504970565 @default.
• W2014371147 cites W1938277549 @default.
• W2014371147 cites W2015611544 @default.
• W2014371147 cites W2086156195 @default.
• W2014371147 cites W2092161635 @default.
• W2014371147 cites W2166640933 @default.
• W2014371147 cites W2475834172 @default.
• W2014371147 cites W2491119577 @default.
• W2014371147 cites W2798823261 @default.
• W2014371147 cites W3135858025 @default.
• W2014371147 cites W3187031679 @default.
• W2014371147 cites W609137923 @default.
• W2014371147 cites W617764635 @default.
• W2014371147 cites W619543676 @default.
• W2014371147 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/ppp.2007.0023" @default.
• W2014371147 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2014371147 type Work @default.
• W2014371147 sameAs 2014371147 @default.
• W2014371147 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2014371147 countsByYear W20143711472016 @default.
• W2014371147 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2014371147 hasAuthorship W2014371147A5002677170 @default.
• W2014371147 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W2014371147 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2014371147 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2014371147 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2014371147 hasConcept C150152722 @default.
• W2014371147 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2014371147 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W2014371147 hasConcept C27206212 @default.
• W2014371147 hasConcept C2777855551 @default.
• W2014371147 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2014371147 hasConcept C74916050 @default.
• W2014371147 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2014371147 hasConceptScore W2014371147C124952713 @default.
• W2014371147 hasConceptScore W2014371147C138885662 @default.
• W2014371147 hasConceptScore W2014371147C142362112 @default.
• W2014371147 hasConceptScore W2014371147C144024400 @default.
• W2014371147 hasConceptScore W2014371147C150152722 @default.
• W2014371147 hasConceptScore W2014371147C15744967 @default.
• W2014371147 hasConceptScore W2014371147C161191863 @default.
• W2014371147 hasConceptScore W2014371147C27206212 @default.
• W2014371147 hasConceptScore W2014371147C2777855551 @default.
• W2014371147 hasConceptScore W2014371147C41008148 @default.
• W2014371147 hasConceptScore W2014371147C74916050 @default.
• W2014371147 hasConceptScore W2014371147C95457728 @default.
• W2014371147 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2014371147 hasLocation W20143711471 @default.
• W2014371147 hasOpenAccess W2014371147 @default.
• W2014371147 hasPrimaryLocation W20143711471 @default.
• W2014371147 hasRelatedWork W1927434488 @default.
• W2014371147 hasRelatedWork W2144982038 @default.
• W2014371147 hasRelatedWork W2335774613 @default.
• W2014371147 hasRelatedWork W2386018419 @default.
• W2014371147 hasRelatedWork W2415677804 @default.
• W2014371147 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2014371147 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2014371147 hasRelatedWork W2932627600 @default.
• W2014371147 hasRelatedWork W3140976437 @default.
• W2014371147 hasRelatedWork W3200015043 @default.
• W2014371147 hasVolume "13" @default.
• W2014371147 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2014371147 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2014371147 magId "2014371147" @default.
• W2014371147 workType "article" @default.