FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2014380880> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2014380880 endingPage "155" @default.
• W2014380880 startingPage "149" @default.
• W2014380880 abstract "In Brief Study Design. Biomechanical evaluation of conventional and noninvasive halos in cadaveric C1–C2 and C5–C6 instability models. Objective. To compare the ability of a conventional halo and noninvasive halo (NIH) to immobilize the unstable cervical spine at the C1–C2 and C5–C6 levels. Summary of Background Data. Many successful outcomes have been reported in cervical spine injury treatment with the conventional halo (CH); however, complications related to pin sites have been reported. The NIH was designed to overcome these complications. To date, no investigation has compared the biomechanical efficacy of the NIH with that of the CH in restricting three-dimensional cervical spine motion. Methods. A global instability was created at the C1–C2 level in 4 cadavers and at C5–C6 in 4 others. Relative motion was measured between the superior and inferior vertebrae during the donning process, execution of the log roll technique, and during the process of sitting up. This testing sequence was followed for all treatment conditions. Results. During the application of the orthoses there was a significant increase in motion at C1–C2 instability and a trend toward increased motion at the C5–C6 instability with CH compared with NIH. In the log roll maneuver, the CH and NIH restrict motion to a similar degree at the C1–C2 instability level, except in frontal plane translation, where CH immobilizes the segment to a greater extent. For the C5–C6 instability the CH provides significantly better immobilization for lateral bending and axial translation. No significant differences were found between the NIH and CH for the sit-up maneuver at either of the levels. Conclusion. Donning of the NIH generates significantly less cervical spine motion than application of the CH. The CH provides superior immobilization for a C5–C6 instability during the log roll maneuver and a C1–C2 instability in the frontal plane during the log-roll maneuver. The CH and NIH immobilize the C1–C2 and C5–C6 instability to a similar degree during the sit-up maneuver. The biomechanics of immobilization with conventional and a noninvasive halos were compared during donning, log roll maneuvers, and sitting up, using electromagnetic sensors in lightly embalmed cadavers. Noninvasive halo donning generates significantly less C1–C2 motion than donning of the CH. The CH immobilizes C5–C6 instability significantly greater during log-roll and both devices perform similarly for C5–C6 and C1–C2 instability for the sit-up maneuver." @default.
• W2014380880 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2014380880 creator A5026014734 @default.
• W2014380880 creator A5061796850 @default.
• W2014380880 creator A5062564113 @default.
• W2014380880 creator A5065123039 @default.
• W2014380880 creator A5075381667 @default.
• W2014380880 creator A5086563883 @default.
• W2014380880 creator A5089065292 @default.
• W2014380880 date "2009-01-01" @default.
• W2014380880 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2014380880 title "Comparing Cervical Spine Motion With Different Halo Devices in a Cadaveric Cervical Instability Model" @default.
• W2014380880 cites W1542777388 @default.
• W2014380880 cites W1978984601 @default.
• W2014380880 cites W1983297447 @default.
• W2014380880 cites W1989435076 @default.
• W2014380880 cites W2004812688 @default.
• W2014380880 cites W2012117097 @default.
• W2014380880 cites W2057715995 @default.
• W2014380880 cites W2067626637 @default.
• W2014380880 cites W2068950227 @default.
• W2014380880 cites W2069777112 @default.
• W2014380880 cites W2072346054 @default.
• W2014380880 cites W2072869640 @default.
• W2014380880 cites W2073466354 @default.
• W2014380880 cites W2076011880 @default.
• W2014380880 cites W2104237299 @default.
• W2014380880 cites W2133663361 @default.
• W2014380880 cites W2145572694 @default.
• W2014380880 cites W2170656534 @default.
• W2014380880 cites W2229664212 @default.
• W2014380880 cites W2312819163 @default.
• W2014380880 cites W4211166672 @default.
• W2014380880 cites W4293877180 @default.
• W2014380880 cites W4588133 @default.
• W2014380880 cites W73036245 @default.
• W2014380880 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e3181920e7c" @default.
• W2014380880 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19139664" @default.
• W2014380880 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2014380880 type Work @default.
• W2014380880 sameAs 2014380880 @default.
• W2014380880 citedByCount "20" @default.
• W2014380880 countsByYear W20143808802012 @default.
• W2014380880 countsByYear W20143808802013 @default.
• W2014380880 countsByYear W20143808802014 @default.
• W2014380880 countsByYear W20143808802015 @default.
• W2014380880 countsByYear W20143808802017 @default.
• W2014380880 countsByYear W20143808802018 @default.
• W2014380880 countsByYear W20143808802021 @default.
• W2014380880 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2014380880 hasAuthorship W2014380880A5026014734 @default.
• W2014380880 hasAuthorship W2014380880A5061796850 @default.
• W2014380880 hasAuthorship W2014380880A5062564113 @default.
• W2014380880 hasAuthorship W2014380880A5065123039 @default.
• W2014380880 hasAuthorship W2014380880A5075381667 @default.
• W2014380880 hasAuthorship W2014380880A5086563883 @default.
• W2014380880 hasAuthorship W2014380880A5089065292 @default.
• W2014380880 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W2014380880 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2014380880 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2014380880 hasConcept C175696284 @default.
• W2014380880 hasConcept C184665706 @default.
• W2014380880 hasConcept C207821765 @default.
• W2014380880 hasConcept C2776944266 @default.
• W2014380880 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2014380880 hasConcept C2985379065 @default.
• W2014380880 hasConcept C57879066 @default.
• W2014380880 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2014380880 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2014380880 hasConcept C91762617 @default.
• W2014380880 hasConcept C98444146 @default.
• W2014380880 hasConceptScore W2014380880C105702510 @default.
• W2014380880 hasConceptScore W2014380880C121332964 @default.
• W2014380880 hasConceptScore W2014380880C141071460 @default.
• W2014380880 hasConceptScore W2014380880C175696284 @default.
• W2014380880 hasConceptScore W2014380880C184665706 @default.
• W2014380880 hasConceptScore W2014380880C207821765 @default.
• W2014380880 hasConceptScore W2014380880C2776944266 @default.
• W2014380880 hasConceptScore W2014380880C29694066 @default.
• W2014380880 hasConceptScore W2014380880C2985379065 @default.
• W2014380880 hasConceptScore W2014380880C57879066 @default.
• W2014380880 hasConceptScore W2014380880C62520636 @default.
• W2014380880 hasConceptScore W2014380880C71924100 @default.
• W2014380880 hasConceptScore W2014380880C91762617 @default.
• W2014380880 hasConceptScore W2014380880C98444146 @default.
• W2014380880 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2014380880 hasLocation W20143808801 @default.
• W2014380880 hasLocation W20143808802 @default.
• W2014380880 hasOpenAccess W2014380880 @default.
• W2014380880 hasPrimaryLocation W20143808801 @default.
• W2014380880 hasRelatedWork W1749010593 @default.
• W2014380880 hasRelatedWork W1974128984 @default.
• W2014380880 hasRelatedWork W1979239769 @default.
• W2014380880 hasRelatedWork W1986416921 @default.
• W2014380880 hasRelatedWork W2046735784 @default.
• W2014380880 hasRelatedWork W2055297836 @default.
• W2014380880 hasRelatedWork W2072004611 @default.
• W2014380880 hasRelatedWork W2167991062 @default.

• next