FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2014476406> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2014476406 abstract "Recently the scientists (Stewart (2001), Phillips (2003), Aksu & Özdemir (2005); Senge, 2008) analyzing the concept of the organization in the process learning give great attention to the consideration of means of organization activity improvement and possibilities of competitive ability increase. One of the most significant possibilities of activity improvement is the evaluation of employees’ activity. Therefore it is very important to ascertain what relation there is between evaluation of employees and organizational learning. Objective of the research – to determine the influence of employees’ evaluation on organizational learning at leisure & sports clubs. Methods used: analysis of scientific literature (in order to systematize the approach of the representatives of organization theory in the process of learning), questionnaire (managers and specialists of sports clubs of Alytus city), descriptive statistical analysis (systematizing data of questionnaire). Restrictions of the empirical research. Questionnaire was carried out one time, i.e., on February-January of 2010, and was not repeated any more. Employees, i.e. instructors of sports club of Alytus city, were questioned during the research. There were 9 leisure sports clubs fully performing their activities (22 instructors working) in Alytus city and there were 21 respondents questioned. Research results: After the analysis of questionnaire data of the employees from sports organizations, it was determined that evaluation of employees’ activity of sports organizations is performed regularly, however there is lack of knowledge presentation about evaluation criteria to employees. Team (structured) evaluation methods affect the analysis of work performed in the organization more than individual (descriptive) methods. When applying team (structured) and individual (descriptive) evaluation methods, knowledge at work is applied more practically than expressed in words, numbers and symbols. The more often employees’ activity is evaluated, the more rarely the persons being analyzed are seeking for information themselves. When performing team evaluation at the organization, the features of organization in the process of learning are more highlighted than after evaluation of the link between the features mostly corresponding to the organization, and the most acceptable factors inducing learning. Although under different intensity, all analyzed aspects of activity evaluation are influencing organizational learning of employees, especially team methods of employees’ evaluation. Usually the function of activity evaluation at leisure and sports clubs of Alytus city is performed by immediate manager. However, there is lack of knowledge presentation about evaluation criteria to the employees. This negatively affects the attitude of employees to evaluation process. Evaluation is usually carried out on a team level with the help of special methods but individual methods are not excluded either. Therefore, the evaluation method should be chosen by every sports organization individually. The positive effect of activity evaluation on the experience and knowledge control and the spread was determined. The aspects named have the influence on the results of organization activity. Therefore, a particular focus should given to the function of evaluation of employees’ activity, particularly when seeking for the increase of competitive advantage.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.em.17.4.3000" @default.
• W2014476406 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2014476406 creator A5026725722 @default.
• W2014476406 creator A5028482647 @default.
• W2014476406 creator A5067356340 @default.
• W2014476406 date "2012-12-07" @default.
• W2014476406 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2014476406 title "DARBUOTOJŲ VERTINIMO ĮTAKA ORGANIZACIJOS MOKYMUISI LAISVALAIKIO SPORTO KLUBUOSE" @default.
• W2014476406 doi "https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.em.17.4.3000" @default.
• W2014476406 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2014476406 type Work @default.
• W2014476406 sameAs 2014476406 @default.
• W2014476406 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2014476406 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2014476406 hasAuthorship W2014476406A5026725722 @default.
• W2014476406 hasAuthorship W2014476406A5028482647 @default.
• W2014476406 hasAuthorship W2014476406A5067356340 @default.
• W2014476406 hasBestOaLocation W20144764061 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConcept C142546437 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConcept C2776035688 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConcept C2776459890 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConcept C2777601897 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConcept C39896193 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConcept C59364581 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConcept C91417265 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConceptScore W2014476406C105702510 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConceptScore W2014476406C105795698 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConceptScore W2014476406C126838900 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConceptScore W2014476406C142546437 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConceptScore W2014476406C144024400 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConceptScore W2014476406C15744967 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConceptScore W2014476406C17744445 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConceptScore W2014476406C2776035688 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConceptScore W2014476406C2776459890 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConceptScore W2014476406C2777601897 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConceptScore W2014476406C33923547 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConceptScore W2014476406C36289849 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConceptScore W2014476406C39549134 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConceptScore W2014476406C39896193 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConceptScore W2014476406C46312422 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConceptScore W2014476406C59364581 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConceptScore W2014476406C71924100 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConceptScore W2014476406C75630572 @default.
• W2014476406 hasConceptScore W2014476406C91417265 @default.
• W2014476406 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2014476406 hasLocation W20144764061 @default.
• W2014476406 hasOpenAccess W2014476406 @default.
• W2014476406 hasPrimaryLocation W20144764061 @default.
• W2014476406 hasRelatedWork W1497633361 @default.
• W2014476406 hasRelatedWork W1997497971 @default.
• W2014476406 hasRelatedWork W2072363615 @default.
• W2014476406 hasRelatedWork W2073261366 @default.
• W2014476406 hasRelatedWork W2348764478 @default.
• W2014476406 hasRelatedWork W2793966321 @default.
• W2014476406 hasRelatedWork W2944894219 @default.
• W2014476406 hasRelatedWork W3134057073 @default.
• W2014476406 hasRelatedWork W364341007 @default.
• W2014476406 hasRelatedWork W8485445 @default.
• W2014476406 hasVolume "17" @default.
• W2014476406 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2014476406 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2014476406 magId "2014476406" @default.
• W2014476406 workType "article" @default.