FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2014532381> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2014532381 endingPage "509" @default.
• W2014532381 startingPage "485" @default.
• W2014532381 abstract "Previous articleNext article No AccessAgainst Epistemological Chasms: The Science Question in Feminism RevisitedSylvia WalbySylvia Walby Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Signs Volume 26, Number 2Winter, 2001 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/495601 Views: 60Total views on this site Citations: 63Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 2001 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Eva Lukšaitė, Rosemary A. Fricker, Robert K. McKinley, Lisa Dikomitis Conceptualising and Teaching Biomedical Uncertainty to Medical Students: an Exploratory Qualitative Study, Medical Science Educator 32, no.22 (Jan 2022): 371–378.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01481-xSylvia Walby Sociology: Fragmentation or reinvigorated synthesis?, Journal of Classical Sociology 21, no.3-43-4 (Sep 2021): 323–333.https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X211042969Richard Milligan, Tyler McCreary, Na’Taki Osborne Jelks Improvising against the racial state in Atlanta: Reimagining agency in environmental justice, Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 94 (Aug 2021): 239965442110389.https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544211038944Shelley Budgeon Making feminist claims in the post-truth era: the authority of personal experience, Feminist Theory 22, no.22 (Feb 2021): 248–267.https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700120988638 Standpoint Theories of Feminism, (Jan 2021): 130–143.https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4090-9.ch009Holly Thorpe, Julie Brice, Anna Rolleston Decolonizing Sport Science: High Performance Sport, Indigenous Cultures, and Women's Rugby, Sociology of Sport Journal 37, no.22 (Jun 2020): 73–84.https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2019-0098Katarina Giritli Nygren, Anna Olofsson, Susanna Öhman Conceptual Frames: Risk and Intersectionality, (Dec 2019): 19–36.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33524-3_2Marta Rawłuszko Feministki we współpracy z państwem. Studium przypadku, (Jan 2020).https://doi.org/10.31338/uw.9788323541004Caterina Carta “A Rose by Any Other Name”: On Ways of Approaching Discourse Analysis, International Studies Review 21, no.11 (Apr 2018): 81–106.https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viy013Cathy O'Mullan, Maryanne Doherty, Rosemary Coates, P. J. Matt Tilley Using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) to provide insight into female sexual difficulties, Sexual and Relationship Therapy 34, no.11 (Oct 2017): 75–86.https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2017.1386300Joey Sprague Feminist Epistemology, Feminist Methodology, and the Study of Gender, (Jun 2018): 45–55.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76333-0_3Leilani Sabzalian , Curriculum Inquiry 48, no.33 ( 2018): 359.https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2018.1474710Heidi Grasswick Strong Objectivity, (Apr 2016): 1–3.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118663219.wbegss304Holly Johnson Degendering Violence, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 22, no.33 (Aug 2015): 390–410.https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxv021Natalie Osborne Intersectionality and kyriarchy: A framework for approaching power and social justice in planning and climate change adaptation, Planning Theory 14, no.22 (May 2015): 130–151.https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095213516443Sandra Harding Objectivity for Sciences from Below, (Jan 2015): 35–55.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14349-1_3Lou-Marie Kruger The Whales Beneath the Surface: The Muddled Story of Doing Research With Poor Mothers in a Developing Country, Health Care for Women International 35, no.7-97-9 (Jun 2014): 1010–1021.https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2014.906441Eileen A. Dombo, Ami P. Bass The Trials and Tribulations of a Practitioner-Researcher: Challenges and Lessons Learned through Testing a Feminist-Cognitive-Relational Social Work Model of Practice, Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work 11, no.1-21-2 (Jan 2014): 43–57.https://doi.org/10.1080/15433714.2013.840177Madhu Satsangi Synthesizing Feminist and Critical Realist Approaches to Housing Studies, Housing, Theory and Society 30, no.22 (Jun 2013): 193–207.https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2012.743484Alistair Mutch Sociomateriality — Taking the wrong turning?, Information and Organization 23, no.11 (Jan 2013): 28–40.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.02.001 Sara O’Shaughnessy and Naomi T. Krogman A Revolution Reconsidered? Examining the Practice of Qualitative Research in Feminist Scholarship, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 37, no.22 (Jul 2015): 493–520.https://doi.org/10.1086/661726Sylvia Walby The Impact of Feminism on Sociology, Sociological Research Online 16, no.33 (Aug 2011): 158–168.https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2373Molly J. Dingel, Joey Sprague Research and reporting on the development of sex in fetuses: gendered from the start, Public Understanding of Science 19, no.22 (Feb 2009): 181–196.https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508096782W. Olsen Moral political economy and moral reasoning about rural India: four theoretical schools compared, Cambridge Journal of Economics 33, no.55 (Jun 2009): 875–902.https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/ben048Kate Driscoll Derickson Gendered, Material, and Partial Knowledges: A Feminist Critique of Neighborhood-Level Indicator Systems, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 41, no.44 (Jan 2009): 896–910.https://doi.org/10.1068/a40255Linda McDowell Thinking through work: complex inequalities, constructions of difference and trans-national migrants, Progress in Human Geography 32, no.44 (Aug 2008): 491–507.https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507088116Paul Lambert, Miriam E. David Social inequalities, gender and lifelong learning, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 28, no.7/87/8 (Jul 2008): 260–272.https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330810890673Kourken Michaelian Privileged Standpoints/Reliable Processes, Hypatia 23, no.11 (Mar 2020): 65–98.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2008.tb01166.x Bibliography, (Jan 2008): 334–367.https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756485.biblioSandra Harding How Standpoint Methodology Informs Philosophy of Social Science, (Jan 2008): 291–310.https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756485.ch12Wendy K. Olsen Realist Ontology and Epistemology for Rural Research, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2008).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1297186Wendy Olsen Pluralist methodology for development economics: the example of moral economy of Indian labour markets, Journal of Economic Methodology 14, no.11 (Mar 2007): 57–82.https://doi.org/10.1080/13501780601170065Sharon Crasnow Feminist anthropology and sociology, (Jan 2007): 755–789.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044451542-1/50024-6Bernard Andrieu Quelle épistémologie du corps ?, Corps 1, no.11 (Jan 2006): 13.https://doi.org/10.3917/corp.001.0013Barbara E. Willard Feminist Interventions in Biomedical Discourse: An Analysis of the Rhetoric of Integrative Medicine, Women's Studies in Communication 28, no.11 (Apr 2005): 115–148.https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2005.10162486 Amy Stambach and Miriam David Feminist Theory and Educational Policy: How Gender Has Been “Involved” in Family School Choice Debates Stambach and David, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 30, no.22 (Jul 2015): 1633–1658.https://doi.org/10.1086/382633Ulrike Teubner Donna Haraway: Die Neuerfindung der Natur. Primaten, Cyborgs und Frauen, (Jan 2005): 296–305.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80445-7_19 Introduction, (Jan 2005): 1–56.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822386889-001 Anthropology, (Jan 2005): 59–88.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822386889-002 Area Studies/Asian Studies, (Jan 2005): 89–125.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822386889-003 Economics, (Jan 2005): 126–141.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822386889-004 Economics/Philosophy of Science, (Jan 2005): 142–172.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822386889-005 History, (Jan 2005): 173–206.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822386889-006 Political Science/Political Theory, (Jan 2005): 207–232.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822386889-007 Sociology and Economics, (Jan 2005): 233–274.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822386889-008 Sociology, (Jan 2005): 275–323.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822386889-009 Philosophy and Critical Realism, (Jan 2005): 327–345.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822386889-010 Philosophy and Standpoint Theory, (Jan 2005): 346–365.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822386889-011 Economics and Critical Realism, (Jan 2005): 366–392.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822386889-012 Process and Temporality in Sociology, (Jan 2005): 393–426.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822386889-013 Psychoanalysis as Critique, (Jan 2005): 427–450.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822386889-014 Sociology of Science, (Jan 2005): 451–469.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822386889-015 Making Sense in and of Political Science, (Jan 2005): 470–495.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822386889-016 Being Undisciplined, (Jan 2005): 496–507.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822386889-017 Conclusion, (Jan 2005): 508–525.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822386889-018 References, (Jan 2005): 527–582.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822386889-019Sandra Harding A Socially Relevant Philosophy of Science? Resources from Standpoint Theory's Controversiality, Hypatia 19, no.11 (Mar 2020): 25–47.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2004.tb01267.xRamona Gunter, Amy Stambach As balancing act and as game: How women and men science faculty experience the promotion process, Gender Issues 21, no.11 (Dec 2003): 24–42.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-003-0020-1David Knights, Wendy Richards Sex Discrimination in UK Academia, Gender, Work and Organization 10, no.22 (Mar 2003): 213–238.https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.t01-1-00012Marcel Stoetzler, Nira Yuval-Davis Standpoint theory, situated knowledge and the situated imagination, Feminist Theory 3, no.33 (Dec 2002): 315–333.https://doi.org/10.1177/146470002762492024 Recent Scholarship, Journal of American History 88, no.44 (Mar 2002): 1633–1682.https://doi.org/10.1093/jahist/88.4.1633Renate Kroll N, (Jan 2002): 286–295.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05004-5_14KATHERINE R. ALLEN Feminist Visions for Transforming Families, Journal of Family Issues 22, no.66 (Sep 2001): 791–809.https://doi.org/10.1177/019251301022006007" @default.
• W2014532381 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2014532381 creator A5050197116 @default.
• W2014532381 date "2001-01-01" @default.
• W2014532381 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2014532381 title "Against Epistemological Chasms: The Science Question in Feminism Revisited" @default.
• W2014532381 cites W146591166 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W1484964519 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W1505563434 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W1522588346 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W1537041991 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W1562680794 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W1602774645 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W1838265797 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W1963989989 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W1968410348 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W1969197772 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W1980491396 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W1984653663 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W1990924773 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W1996307874 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W1998619251 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W2002837303 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W2008934558 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W2009699498 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W2014307689 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W2020678388 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W2022455706 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W2028143862 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W2034508937 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W2036422348 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W2046823563 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W2048365582 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W2053120142 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W2062172061 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W2064924572 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W2075147813 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W2089132569 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W2101234667 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W2104476183 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W2108221308 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W2116457210 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W2128218911 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W2131918978 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W2139967826 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W2332086916 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W2545726875 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W266957799 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W2764914421 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W2798542237 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W2798862961 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W3146083582 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W389816576 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W583170147 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W650066909 @default.
• W2014532381 cites W2755448294 @default.
• W2014532381 doi "https://doi.org/10.1086/495601" @default.
• W2014532381 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
• W2014532381 type Work @default.
• W2014532381 sameAs 2014532381 @default.
• W2014532381 citedByCount "88" @default.
• W2014532381 countsByYear W20145323812012 @default.
• W2014532381 countsByYear W20145323812013 @default.
• W2014532381 countsByYear W20145323812014 @default.
• W2014532381 countsByYear W20145323812015 @default.
• W2014532381 countsByYear W20145323812016 @default.
• W2014532381 countsByYear W20145323812017 @default.
• W2014532381 countsByYear W20145323812018 @default.
• W2014532381 countsByYear W20145323812019 @default.
• W2014532381 countsByYear W20145323812020 @default.
• W2014532381 countsByYear W20145323812021 @default.
• W2014532381 countsByYear W20145323812022 @default.
• W2014532381 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2014532381 hasAuthorship W2014532381A5050197116 @default.
• W2014532381 hasConcept C107993555 @default.
• W2014532381 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2014532381 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2014532381 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2014532381 hasConcept C2777688943 @default.
• W2014532381 hasConcept C2778584255 @default.
• W2014532381 hasConcept C29595303 @default.
• W2014532381 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2014532381 hasConceptScore W2014532381C107993555 @default.
• W2014532381 hasConceptScore W2014532381C144024400 @default.
• W2014532381 hasConceptScore W2014532381C17744445 @default.
• W2014532381 hasConceptScore W2014532381C199539241 @default.
• W2014532381 hasConceptScore W2014532381C2777688943 @default.
• W2014532381 hasConceptScore W2014532381C2778584255 @default.
• W2014532381 hasConceptScore W2014532381C29595303 @default.
• W2014532381 hasConceptScore W2014532381C94625758 @default.
• W2014532381 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2014532381 hasLocation W20145323811 @default.
• W2014532381 hasOpenAccess W2014532381 @default.
• W2014532381 hasPrimaryLocation W20145323811 @default.
• W2014532381 hasRelatedWork W127987774 @default.
• W2014532381 hasRelatedWork W2094403418 @default.
• W2014532381 hasRelatedWork W2377144030 @default.
• W2014532381 hasRelatedWork W2979561700 @default.

• next