FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2014619663> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2014619663 endingPage "91" @default.
• W2014619663 startingPage "91" @default.
• W2014619663 abstract "This article is also accessible online at: http://BioMedNet.com/karger How does surgical or laparoscopical knowledge advance? This was the main question in a recently published commentary by Horton [1] who compared surgical research with a comic opera, questions but few answers. This provocative statement is based on a review of the first issue of nine leading general surgical journals for 1996 where 46% of the articles were case series, 18% experimental animal data and only 7% controlled randomized data. He stated that ‘only when the quality of publications in the surgical literature has improved, will surgeons reasonably be able to rebut the charge that as much as half of the research they undertake is misconceived’. Surgeons must be aware of this statement, especially when performing laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopic surgery is now considered to be the new standard treatment for symptomatic gallstones and gastroesophageal reflux disease; furthermore, laparoscopy is a proven diagnostic tool for evaluating acute and chronic abdominal pain. However, since the introduction of laparoscopic surgery in general surgery, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the standard treatment for symptomatic gallstones without the backup of comparative scientific data. In a recently published controlled randomized series comparing LC versus small-incision cholecystectomy, it could be demonstrated that LC did not offer any clear advantages over open small-incision cholecystectomy [2]. Thus, the overall value of laparoscopic surgery even for treating symptomatic gallstones is under debate, and many further questions such as postoperative adhesion formation, tumor seeding, postoperative immunological response, and socioeconomic factors have to be answered. This can only be achieved when we, the laparoscopic surgeons, start to improve the quality of our surgical research, either by performing basic experimental research (with standardized surgical procedures in a small animal model), or by performing well-designed randomized clinical series, multicenter studies and meta-analyses. Although large prospective case series are important in clinical surgical research, they are considered to be of minor scientific importance and cannot define the exact role of laparoscopic surgery in clinical practice. Therefore, the current issue of Digestive Surgery aims to rebut the change that laparoscopic research is of minor value, and that it can be performed experimentally and clinically on a high scientific level. The first topic deals with the impact of the postoperative immune response both clinically and experimentally. Furthermore, an overview is given on the role of the pneumoperitoneum using different gases on tumor growth and seeding, and summarizes the risk of laparoscopic surgery on developing portsite recurrences in general and colorectal surgery. The second topic deals with experimental animal surgery, how can laparoscopy be performed in the rat and which surgical procedures are standardized. Furthermore, it adds a new resectional technique of partial hepatectomy, which can be performed laparoscopically in a small animal model. Finally it summarizes the impact, pathogenesis and prevention on postoperative adhesion formation after open and laparoscopic surgery. The third topic gives a clinical update on laparoscopic hernia repair and the laparoscopic treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Two new fields in endoscopic surgery are furthermore presented, namely retroperitoneoscopy and assisted spine surgery. We hope that the current issue demonstrates the need and importance of well-performed research in laparoscopic surgery in order to rebut the charge that laparoscopic research is of questionable value." @default.
• W2014619663 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2014619663 creator A5008955842 @default.
• W2014619663 creator A5036032282 @default.
• W2014619663 date "1998-01-01" @default.
• W2014619663 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2014619663 title "Laparoscopic Surgery: Recent Developments in Basic Research and Clinical Update" @default.
• W2014619663 cites W2003112722 @default.
• W2014619663 cites W2020763209 @default.
• W2014619663 doi "https://doi.org/10.1159/000018599" @default.
• W2014619663 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9882165" @default.
• W2014619663 hasPublicationYear "1998" @default.
• W2014619663 type Work @default.
• W2014619663 sameAs 2014619663 @default.
• W2014619663 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2014619663 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2014619663 hasAuthorship W2014619663A5008955842 @default.
• W2014619663 hasAuthorship W2014619663A5036032282 @default.
• W2014619663 hasBestOaLocation W20146196631 @default.
• W2014619663 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2014619663 hasConcept C2776111594 @default.
• W2014619663 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
• W2014619663 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2014619663 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2014619663 hasConceptScore W2014619663C141071460 @default.
• W2014619663 hasConceptScore W2014619663C2776111594 @default.
• W2014619663 hasConceptScore W2014619663C2780047204 @default.
• W2014619663 hasConceptScore W2014619663C61434518 @default.
• W2014619663 hasConceptScore W2014619663C71924100 @default.
• W2014619663 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2014619663 hasLocation W20146196631 @default.
• W2014619663 hasLocation W20146196632 @default.
• W2014619663 hasOpenAccess W2014619663 @default.
• W2014619663 hasPrimaryLocation W20146196631 @default.
• W2014619663 hasRelatedWork W2051644419 @default.
• W2014619663 hasRelatedWork W2369526291 @default.
• W2014619663 hasRelatedWork W2373562280 @default.
• W2014619663 hasRelatedWork W2375159187 @default.
• W2014619663 hasRelatedWork W2375586148 @default.
• W2014619663 hasRelatedWork W2380479735 @default.
• W2014619663 hasRelatedWork W2383915676 @default.
• W2014619663 hasRelatedWork W2389198142 @default.
• W2014619663 hasRelatedWork W2390961722 @default.
• W2014619663 hasRelatedWork W3144788386 @default.
• W2014619663 hasVolume "15" @default.
• W2014619663 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2014619663 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2014619663 magId "2014619663" @default.
• W2014619663 workType "article" @default.