FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2014967897> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2014967897 endingPage "81" @default.
• W2014967897 startingPage "43" @default.
• W2014967897 abstract "Abstract The punch press is a further classical example of impact noise: the force is built up in the punch relatively slowly, and the whole machine is strained until the load on the material being punched reaches a yield and shortly afterwards a fracture level. At this stage the strain energy in the machine and its workpiece must be redistributed and this leads to vibration of the whole machine and to noise radiation. In this paper work which has been carried out at ISVR over a number of years is presented. It describes the way the Energy Accountancy Equation [1] can be modified to relate the noise radiated directly to the sum of the squares of the large rates of change of force against time, and illustrates clearly the way that noise control, with use of passive or active methods in designing the punch tooling, can be related directly to the one parameter 10 log Σ [ f ( t )] max 2 . It is shown that noise levels can be reduced by up to 30 dB under ideal conditions by fracture pulse tailoring while still cutting metal, but that more realistically, 10 dB reductions may be obtained below those of current practice by practical tool design. An explanation is given of why large open presses are never likely to achieve the proposed factory noise levels and that the noise from double-sided presses can be controlled effectively by tooling modifications and by the addition of damping. The paper describes work carried out on passive and active cancellation systems used to arrest and springback of the press structure following workpiece material fracture and explains the practical limitations of such systems. Active techniques are limited by the difficulties obtained, with brittle hard materials, of finding a trigger and load freezing system which can operate fast enough to reduce adequately the force parameter 10 log Σ ( f max ( t )) 2 . Where punching finish allows, it has been found that well-designed shear and/or cutting with low percentage clearance is superior to active cancellation, since this provides a surer method of reducing the above force parameter, especially for harder materials. The Energy Accountancy Equation suggests that the use of increased structural damping can be an effective method of noise reduction, particularly if the punch press structure is initially only lightly damped. Experiments on a third-scale model of a 200 tonne double-sided press suggest that this damping needs to be added selectively in areas where the vibrational energy density is high and coincides with areas of high noise radiation. Thus, in the experiments described, 12 dB reduction has been obtained under such conditions, only 1 or 2 dB reduction being obtained when damping of the base plate has been unaltered." @default.
• W2014967897 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2014967897 creator A5063797345 @default.
• W2014967897 creator A5064776227 @default.
• W2014967897 date "1985-11-01" @default.
• W2014967897 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W2014967897 title "On the prediction of impact noise, Part IX: The noise from punch presses" @default.
• W2014967897 cites W1971124184 @default.
• W2014967897 cites W1999105205 @default.
• W2014967897 cites W2047246531 @default.
• W2014967897 cites W2048110077 @default.
• W2014967897 cites W2064765819 @default.
• W2014967897 cites W2093987830 @default.
• W2014967897 cites W617858141 @default.
• W2014967897 cites W2006107331 @default.
• W2014967897 cites W2129381850 @default.
• W2014967897 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460x(85)90247-0" @default.
• W2014967897 hasPublicationYear "1985" @default.
• W2014967897 type Work @default.
• W2014967897 sameAs 2014967897 @default.
• W2014967897 citedByCount "10" @default.
• W2014967897 countsByYear W20149678972015 @default.
• W2014967897 countsByYear W20149678972016 @default.
• W2014967897 countsByYear W20149678972018 @default.
• W2014967897 countsByYear W20149678972023 @default.
• W2014967897 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2014967897 hasAuthorship W2014967897A5063797345 @default.
• W2014967897 hasAuthorship W2014967897A5064776227 @default.
• W2014967897 hasConcept C115961682 @default.
• W2014967897 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2014967897 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2014967897 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2014967897 hasConcept C24890656 @default.
• W2014967897 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2014967897 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2014967897 hasConcept C99498987 @default.
• W2014967897 hasConceptScore W2014967897C115961682 @default.
• W2014967897 hasConceptScore W2014967897C121332964 @default.
• W2014967897 hasConceptScore W2014967897C127413603 @default.
• W2014967897 hasConceptScore W2014967897C154945302 @default.
• W2014967897 hasConceptScore W2014967897C24890656 @default.
• W2014967897 hasConceptScore W2014967897C33923547 @default.
• W2014967897 hasConceptScore W2014967897C41008148 @default.
• W2014967897 hasConceptScore W2014967897C99498987 @default.
• W2014967897 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2014967897 hasLocation W20149678971 @default.
• W2014967897 hasOpenAccess W2014967897 @default.
• W2014967897 hasPrimaryLocation W20149678971 @default.
• W2014967897 hasRelatedWork W185733981 @default.
• W2014967897 hasRelatedWork W1984560925 @default.
• W2014967897 hasRelatedWork W2000794185 @default.
• W2014967897 hasRelatedWork W2040499981 @default.
• W2014967897 hasRelatedWork W2089218326 @default.
• W2014967897 hasRelatedWork W2091474092 @default.
• W2014967897 hasRelatedWork W2100665530 @default.
• W2014967897 hasRelatedWork W2279382477 @default.
• W2014967897 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2014967897 hasRelatedWork W2992395496 @default.
• W2014967897 hasVolume "103" @default.
• W2014967897 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2014967897 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2014967897 magId "2014967897" @default.
• W2014967897 workType "article" @default.