Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2014972635> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 52 of
52
with 100 items per page.
- W2014972635 endingPage "420" @default.
- W2014972635 startingPage "388" @default.
- W2014972635 abstract "English common law practitioners and judges borrowed much of the conceptual structure for their body of legal knowledge from the legal culture of continental Europe over the centuries. Their surviving writings show a marked increase in the use of Roman legal classifications in the century before 1600: public and private, criminal and civil, real and personal, property and possession, contract and delict, among other examples.1 Those who perpetuated the learning of the English royal courts in the sixteenth century had begun fitting it into a framework borrowed from the two great bodies of 'learned law' taught in the universities of Europe: civil (Roman) law and canon law. Common lawyers expressed the need for an 'institutes' of English law, a written introductory work that would survey the whole of the common law in its main classifications, comparable to Justinian's Institutes of Roman law (533 AD) and Giovanni Paolo Lancelotti's Institutes of canon law (1563). In the decades after 1600, such institutes of common law began to appear.2 This paper investigates the common lawyers' attitudes towards canon law and civil law' in the period from 1300 to 1600. How much canon law and civil law did" @default.
- W2014972635 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2014972635 creator A5000473544 @default.
- W2014972635 date "1993-01-01" @default.
- W2014972635 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W2014972635 title "The Reception of Canon Law and Civil Law in the Common Law Courts before 1600" @default.
- W2014972635 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/13.3.388" @default.
- W2014972635 hasPublicationYear "1993" @default.
- W2014972635 type Work @default.
- W2014972635 sameAs 2014972635 @default.
- W2014972635 citedByCount "11" @default.
- W2014972635 countsByYear W20149726352012 @default.
- W2014972635 countsByYear W20149726352013 @default.
- W2014972635 countsByYear W20149726352015 @default.
- W2014972635 countsByYear W20149726352016 @default.
- W2014972635 countsByYear W20149726352018 @default.
- W2014972635 countsByYear W20149726352019 @default.
- W2014972635 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2014972635 hasAuthorship W2014972635A5000473544 @default.
- W2014972635 hasBestOaLocation W20149726352 @default.
- W2014972635 hasConcept C170706310 @default.
- W2014972635 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2014972635 hasConcept C177986884 @default.
- W2014972635 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2014972635 hasConcept C2780677400 @default.
- W2014972635 hasConceptScore W2014972635C170706310 @default.
- W2014972635 hasConceptScore W2014972635C17744445 @default.
- W2014972635 hasConceptScore W2014972635C177986884 @default.
- W2014972635 hasConceptScore W2014972635C199539241 @default.
- W2014972635 hasConceptScore W2014972635C2780677400 @default.
- W2014972635 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2014972635 hasLocation W20149726351 @default.
- W2014972635 hasLocation W20149726352 @default.
- W2014972635 hasOpenAccess W2014972635 @default.
- W2014972635 hasPrimaryLocation W20149726351 @default.
- W2014972635 hasRelatedWork W1583325327 @default.
- W2014972635 hasRelatedWork W2014972635 @default.
- W2014972635 hasRelatedWork W2351773084 @default.
- W2014972635 hasRelatedWork W2511627740 @default.
- W2014972635 hasRelatedWork W254452281 @default.
- W2014972635 hasRelatedWork W2555437017 @default.
- W2014972635 hasRelatedWork W2900516151 @default.
- W2014972635 hasRelatedWork W2921746665 @default.
- W2014972635 hasRelatedWork W3121298349 @default.
- W2014972635 hasRelatedWork W3149534907 @default.
- W2014972635 hasVolume "13" @default.
- W2014972635 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2014972635 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2014972635 magId "2014972635" @default.
- W2014972635 workType "article" @default.