FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2014985285> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2014985285 endingPage "2647" @default.
• W2014985285 startingPage "2630" @default.
• W2014985285 abstract "The search task of Luck, Hillyard, Mangun and Gazzaniga (1989) was optimised to test for the presence of a bilateral field advantage in the visual search capabilities of normal subjects. The modified design used geometrically regular arrays of 2, 4 or 8 items restricted to hemifields delineated by the vertical or horizontal meridian; the target, if present, appeared at one of two fixed positions per quadrant at an eccentricity of 11 deg. Group and individual performance data were analysed in terms of the slope of response time against display-size functions (‘RT slope’). Averaging performance across all conditions save display mode (bilateral vs. unilateral) revealed a significant bilateral advantage in the form of a 21% increase in apparent item scanning speed for target detection; in the absence of a target, bilateral displays gave a 5% increase in speed that was not significant. Factor analysis by ANOVA confirmed this main effect of display mode, and also revealed several higher order interactions with display geometry, indicating that the bilateral advantage was masked at certain target positions by a crowding-like effect. In a numerical model of search efficiency (i.e. RT slope), bilateral advantage was parameterised by an interhemispheric ‘transfer factor’ (T) that governs the strength of the ipsilateral representation of distractors, and modifies the level of intrahemispheric competition with the target. The factor T was found to be higher in superior field than inferior field; this result held for the modelled data of each individual subject, as well as the group, representing a uniform tendency for the bilateral advantage to be more prominent in inferior field. In fact statistical analysis and modelling of search efficiency showed that the geometrical display factors (target polar and quadrantic location, and associated crowding effects) were all remarkably consistent across subjects. Greater variability was inferred within a fixed, decisional component of response time, with individual subjects capable of opposite hemifield biases. The results are interpretable by a guided search model of spatial attention – a first, parallel stage guiding selection by a second, serial stage – with the proviso that the first stage is relatively insular within each hemisphere. The bilateral advantage in search efficiency can then be attributed to a relative gain in target weight within the initial parallel stage, owing to a reduction in distractor competition mediated specifically by intrahemispheric circuitry. In the absence of a target there is no effective guidance, and hence no basis for a bilateral advantage to enhance search efficiency; the equivalence of scanning speed for the two display modes (bilateral and unilateral) implies a unitary second-stage process mediated via efficient interhemispheric integration." @default.
• W2014985285 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2014985285 creator A5045312887 @default.
• W2014985285 date "2011-07-01" @default.
• W2014985285 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2014985285 title "Interhemispheric integration in visual search" @default.
• W2014985285 cites W1602341779 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W1942208524 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W1963737688 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W1977729847 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W1988501803 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W1995108164 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W1995472754 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W1995920481 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W1999473774 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2001284551 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2008009892 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2009459217 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2010931698 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2011352214 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2015987438 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2019716470 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2029376267 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2030522750 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2031650972 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2032340090 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2034215404 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2038894208 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2041789070 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2052991563 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2054211191 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2055224036 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2062070868 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2066278330 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2078033928 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2085846544 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2085862861 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2089155462 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2090263161 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2091166755 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2092803557 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2093353037 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2097574824 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2110883107 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2111362359 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2118095433 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2119060138 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2119169813 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2119449000 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2121449541 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2121610836 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2125664509 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2129435010 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2131415053 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2131605659 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2135629346 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2136022845 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2140158033 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2144023491 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2147468018 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2155985703 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2157258520 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2160764709 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2161226428 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2162347612 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2164291214 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W2326861040 @default.
• W2014985285 cites W4244377933 @default.
• W2014985285 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.05.011" @default.
• W2014985285 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3149659" @default.
• W2014985285 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21640738" @default.
• W2014985285 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2014985285 type Work @default.
• W2014985285 sameAs 2014985285 @default.
• W2014985285 citedByCount "10" @default.
• W2014985285 countsByYear W20149852852013 @default.
• W2014985285 countsByYear W20149852852014 @default.
• W2014985285 countsByYear W20149852852015 @default.
• W2014985285 countsByYear W20149852852022 @default.
• W2014985285 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2014985285 hasAuthorship W2014985285A5045312887 @default.
• W2014985285 hasBestOaLocation W20149852851 @default.
• W2014985285 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2014985285 hasConcept C1276947 @default.
• W2014985285 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2014985285 hasConcept C158495155 @default.
• W2014985285 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2014985285 hasConcept C179691212 @default.
• W2014985285 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2014985285 hasConcept C2776058522 @default.
• W2014985285 hasConcept C2779918689 @default.
• W2014985285 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
• W2014985285 hasConceptScore W2014985285C121332964 @default.
• W2014985285 hasConceptScore W2014985285C1276947 @default.
• W2014985285 hasConceptScore W2014985285C15744967 @default.
• W2014985285 hasConceptScore W2014985285C158495155 @default.
• W2014985285 hasConceptScore W2014985285C169760540 @default.
• W2014985285 hasConceptScore W2014985285C179691212 @default.

• next