Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2015013605> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 75 of
75
with 100 items per page.
- W2015013605 endingPage "S263" @default.
- W2015013605 startingPage "S263" @default.
- W2015013605 abstract "ObjectiveTo investigate if a specific low responder controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) protocol results in superior pregnancy outcomes in anticipated low responder women of favorable age groups (< 38 yo) during first fresh IVF attempt.DesignRetrospective cohort study in a tertiary academic center.Materials and MethodsA total of 1164 consecutive IVF cycles were reviewed from Jan 05 - Dec 10. All 322 initial fresh IVF attempts utilizing low responder protocol [GnRH antagonist (ANT) or GnRH agonist flare (FL)] were reviewed. Low responders were defined by ovarian reserve testing (Basal FSH and AFC) and protocols chosen by the patient's physician. Patient demographics, IVF cycle characteristics, and pregnancy outcomes of both groups were analyzed using SPSS.ResultsTwo hundred seventy-two IVF cycles were analyzed according to inclusion criteria [ANT-N = 146 (53.7%); FL-N = 126 (46.3%)] and 85.7% of the cycles went to ET (ANT = 89.7 and FL = 81.0%). Respective demographic characteristics including mean age, BMI, number of prior superovulation/intrauterine inseminations, gravidity, and parity were similar between both groups. The AFC was higher (7.06 ± 2.36 vs. 8.87 ± 3.15, P<0.0001) and day 3 FSH level lower (10.40 ± 3.80 vs. 8.17 ± 2.32, P<0.0001) in the ANT group. After controlling for day 3 AFC and FSH, the ANT group demonstrated a greater ovarian response and produced higher quality embryos compared to FL group. The overall clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in both groups were similar but subanalysis of the patients younger than 36 years old revealed that cycles of ANT group were more likely to result in live birth than the FL group [23 (42.6%), vs.12(22.2%), P=0.02].ConclusionWhen controlling for ovarian reserve testing in women of favorable age prognosis groups, a specific subgroup of women < 36 years of age with anticipated low responder status demonstrated superior ovarian response, embryo cohort quality and pregnancy outcomes with ANT protocol compared to FL during first fresh IVF attempt. ObjectiveTo investigate if a specific low responder controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) protocol results in superior pregnancy outcomes in anticipated low responder women of favorable age groups (< 38 yo) during first fresh IVF attempt. To investigate if a specific low responder controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) protocol results in superior pregnancy outcomes in anticipated low responder women of favorable age groups (< 38 yo) during first fresh IVF attempt. DesignRetrospective cohort study in a tertiary academic center. Retrospective cohort study in a tertiary academic center. Materials and MethodsA total of 1164 consecutive IVF cycles were reviewed from Jan 05 - Dec 10. All 322 initial fresh IVF attempts utilizing low responder protocol [GnRH antagonist (ANT) or GnRH agonist flare (FL)] were reviewed. Low responders were defined by ovarian reserve testing (Basal FSH and AFC) and protocols chosen by the patient's physician. Patient demographics, IVF cycle characteristics, and pregnancy outcomes of both groups were analyzed using SPSS. A total of 1164 consecutive IVF cycles were reviewed from Jan 05 - Dec 10. All 322 initial fresh IVF attempts utilizing low responder protocol [GnRH antagonist (ANT) or GnRH agonist flare (FL)] were reviewed. Low responders were defined by ovarian reserve testing (Basal FSH and AFC) and protocols chosen by the patient's physician. Patient demographics, IVF cycle characteristics, and pregnancy outcomes of both groups were analyzed using SPSS. ResultsTwo hundred seventy-two IVF cycles were analyzed according to inclusion criteria [ANT-N = 146 (53.7%); FL-N = 126 (46.3%)] and 85.7% of the cycles went to ET (ANT = 89.7 and FL = 81.0%). Respective demographic characteristics including mean age, BMI, number of prior superovulation/intrauterine inseminations, gravidity, and parity were similar between both groups. The AFC was higher (7.06 ± 2.36 vs. 8.87 ± 3.15, P<0.0001) and day 3 FSH level lower (10.40 ± 3.80 vs. 8.17 ± 2.32, P<0.0001) in the ANT group. After controlling for day 3 AFC and FSH, the ANT group demonstrated a greater ovarian response and produced higher quality embryos compared to FL group. The overall clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in both groups were similar but subanalysis of the patients younger than 36 years old revealed that cycles of ANT group were more likely to result in live birth than the FL group [23 (42.6%), vs.12(22.2%), P=0.02]. Two hundred seventy-two IVF cycles were analyzed according to inclusion criteria [ANT-N = 146 (53.7%); FL-N = 126 (46.3%)] and 85.7% of the cycles went to ET (ANT = 89.7 and FL = 81.0%). Respective demographic characteristics including mean age, BMI, number of prior superovulation/intrauterine inseminations, gravidity, and parity were similar between both groups. The AFC was higher (7.06 ± 2.36 vs. 8.87 ± 3.15, P<0.0001) and day 3 FSH level lower (10.40 ± 3.80 vs. 8.17 ± 2.32, P<0.0001) in the ANT group. After controlling for day 3 AFC and FSH, the ANT group demonstrated a greater ovarian response and produced higher quality embryos compared to FL group. The overall clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in both groups were similar but subanalysis of the patients younger than 36 years old revealed that cycles of ANT group were more likely to result in live birth than the FL group [23 (42.6%), vs.12(22.2%), P=0.02]. ConclusionWhen controlling for ovarian reserve testing in women of favorable age prognosis groups, a specific subgroup of women < 36 years of age with anticipated low responder status demonstrated superior ovarian response, embryo cohort quality and pregnancy outcomes with ANT protocol compared to FL during first fresh IVF attempt. When controlling for ovarian reserve testing in women of favorable age prognosis groups, a specific subgroup of women < 36 years of age with anticipated low responder status demonstrated superior ovarian response, embryo cohort quality and pregnancy outcomes with ANT protocol compared to FL during first fresh IVF attempt." @default.
- W2015013605 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2015013605 creator A5015367180 @default.
- W2015013605 creator A5026268511 @default.
- W2015013605 creator A5035004418 @default.
- W2015013605 creator A5045461470 @default.
- W2015013605 creator A5082965624 @default.
- W2015013605 creator A5084156499 @default.
- W2015013605 date "2011-09-01" @default.
- W2015013605 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
- W2015013605 title "IVF outcomes following GnRH agonist flare and GnRH Antagonist stimulation protocols in young low responders undergoing their first IVF cycle" @default.
- W2015013605 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.07.1005" @default.
- W2015013605 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
- W2015013605 type Work @default.
- W2015013605 sameAs 2015013605 @default.
- W2015013605 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2015013605 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2015013605 hasAuthorship W2015013605A5015367180 @default.
- W2015013605 hasAuthorship W2015013605A5026268511 @default.
- W2015013605 hasAuthorship W2015013605A5035004418 @default.
- W2015013605 hasAuthorship W2015013605A5045461470 @default.
- W2015013605 hasAuthorship W2015013605A5082965624 @default.
- W2015013605 hasAuthorship W2015013605A5084156499 @default.
- W2015013605 hasBestOaLocation W20150136051 @default.
- W2015013605 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2015013605 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
- W2015013605 hasConcept C170493617 @default.
- W2015013605 hasConcept C2776600139 @default.
- W2015013605 hasConcept C2777688143 @default.
- W2015013605 hasConcept C2777785397 @default.
- W2015013605 hasConcept C2778279030 @default.
- W2015013605 hasConcept C2778478619 @default.
- W2015013605 hasConcept C2778938600 @default.
- W2015013605 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
- W2015013605 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
- W2015013605 hasConcept C512716672 @default.
- W2015013605 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
- W2015013605 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2015013605 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2015013605 hasConceptScore W2015013605C126322002 @default.
- W2015013605 hasConceptScore W2015013605C131872663 @default.
- W2015013605 hasConceptScore W2015013605C170493617 @default.
- W2015013605 hasConceptScore W2015013605C2776600139 @default.
- W2015013605 hasConceptScore W2015013605C2777688143 @default.
- W2015013605 hasConceptScore W2015013605C2777785397 @default.
- W2015013605 hasConceptScore W2015013605C2778279030 @default.
- W2015013605 hasConceptScore W2015013605C2778478619 @default.
- W2015013605 hasConceptScore W2015013605C2778938600 @default.
- W2015013605 hasConceptScore W2015013605C2779234561 @default.
- W2015013605 hasConceptScore W2015013605C29456083 @default.
- W2015013605 hasConceptScore W2015013605C512716672 @default.
- W2015013605 hasConceptScore W2015013605C54355233 @default.
- W2015013605 hasConceptScore W2015013605C71924100 @default.
- W2015013605 hasConceptScore W2015013605C86803240 @default.
- W2015013605 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2015013605 hasLocation W20150136051 @default.
- W2015013605 hasOpenAccess W2015013605 @default.
- W2015013605 hasPrimaryLocation W20150136051 @default.
- W2015013605 hasRelatedWork W1744945361 @default.
- W2015013605 hasRelatedWork W2007191895 @default.
- W2015013605 hasRelatedWork W2067437835 @default.
- W2015013605 hasRelatedWork W2381015524 @default.
- W2015013605 hasRelatedWork W2757880901 @default.
- W2015013605 hasRelatedWork W3039468479 @default.
- W2015013605 hasRelatedWork W3156359893 @default.
- W2015013605 hasRelatedWork W3168941445 @default.
- W2015013605 hasRelatedWork W4223905958 @default.
- W2015013605 hasRelatedWork W4302760395 @default.
- W2015013605 hasVolume "96" @default.
- W2015013605 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2015013605 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2015013605 magId "2015013605" @default.
- W2015013605 workType "article" @default.